组织工程与重建外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 148-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

关节镜下改良阻挡线减张技术在大范围肩袖撕裂手术中的应用

  

  • 出版日期:2022-04-01 发布日期:2022-06-22

Application of modified load-sharing rip-stop technique under arthroscopy in the surgery of large-scale rotator cuff tear 

  • Online:2022-04-01 Published:2022-06-22

摘要: 目的 探讨关节镜下改良阻挡线减张技术(Modified load-sharing rip-stop technique,mLSRS)在大范围肩袖撕裂手术中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析2018年9月至2020年9月本院收治的76例大范围肩袖撕裂伤患者资料,按照手术方式不同,分为mLSRS组(观察组,37例)、缝线桥组(对照组,39例)。比较两组患者手术前后肩关节功能、肩关节活动度及术后再撕裂发生情况和术后并发症发生情况等。结果 术前两组患者ASES评分、UCLA评分、肩关节活动度、SF-36评分及VAS评分均无显著差异(P>0.05);术后3个月及术后1年,两组患者ASES评分、UCLA评分、SF-36评分及肩关节活动度均较术前显著提高(P<0.05),VAS评分较术前显著降低(P<0.05),两组间各指标相比均无显著差异(P>0.05);两组患者术后1年并发症总发生率无显著差异(P>0.05);观察组患者术后再撕裂发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对于大范围肩袖撕裂患者,关节镜下mLSRS技术与双排缝线桥技术均能取得满意疗效,其中mLSRS技术可降低术后Ⅱ型再撕裂发生情况。

关键词: 关节镜,  改良阻挡线减张技术,  肩袖撕裂,  疗效

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of modified load-sharing rip-stop technique (mLSRS) under arthroscopy in the surgery of large-scale rotator cuff tear. Methods A retrospective analysis of the data of 76 patients with large-scale rotator cuff laceration admitted to our hospital from September 2018 to September 2020 was conducted. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into mLSRS group (observation group, n=37) and suture bridge group (control group, n=39). The shoulder joint function, shoulder joint mobility of patients before and after surgery, the postoperative re-tearing and postoperative complications of two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in ASES score, UCLA score, shoulder mobility, SF-36 score and VAS score between the two groups before surgery(P>0.05); At three months after operation and one year after operation, the ASES score, UCLA score, SF-36 score and shoulder mobility of the two groups were significantly improved compared with preoperatively(P<0.05), the VAS score was significantly lower than that of preoperative(P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in each index; There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups within 1 year after surgery (P>0.05), while the incidence of postoperative tearing in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with large-scale rotator cuff tear, both the mLSRS technique and the double-row suture bridge technique under arthroscopy can achieve satisfactory results, and the mLSRS technique can reduce the occurrence of postoperative type Ⅱ re-tear.   

Key words: Arthroscopy,  Modified load-sharing rip-stop technique,  Rotator cuff tear,  Curative effect