review

Calcium-looping based energy conversion and storage for carbon neutrality -the way forward

  • Zhiwei Ge 1, 2, 3 ,
  • Binlin Dou 4 ,
  • Liang Wang 1, 2, 3 ,
  • Yulong Ding 5 ,
  • Haisheng Chen , 1, 2, 3, * ,
  • Yimin Xuan 6
Expand
  • 1 Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.19(A) Yuquan Rd, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3 Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
  • 4 School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
  • 5 Birmingham Centre for Energy Storage Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
  • 6 School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received date: 2022-06-03

  Accepted date: 2022-09-14

  Online published: 2022-10-27

Abstract

With the global ambition of moving towards carbon neutrality, this sets to increase significantly with most of the energy sources from renewables. As a result, cost-effective and resource efficient energy conversion and storage will have a great role to play in energy decarbonization. This review focuses on the most recent developments of one of the most promising energy conversion and storage technologies - the calcium-looping. It includes the basics and barriers of calcium-looping beyond CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and technological solutions to address the associated challenges from material to system. Specifically, this paper discusses the flexibility of calcium-looping in the context of CO2 capture, combined with the use of H2-rich fuel gas conversion and thermochemical heat storage. To take advantage of calcium-looping based energy integrated utilization of CCS (EIUCCS) in carbon neutral power generation, multiple-scale process innovations will be required, starting from the material level and extending to the system level.

Cite this article

Zhiwei Ge , Binlin Dou , Liang Wang , Yulong Ding , Haisheng Chen , Yimin Xuan . Calcium-looping based energy conversion and storage for carbon neutrality -the way forward[J]. Carbon Neutrality, 2022 , 1(1) : 35 . DOI: 10.1007/s43979-022-00034-4

1 Introduction and objectives - calcium-looping based energy conversion and storage

1.1 The challenges in carbon neutrality of our energy systems

Limiting the global average temperature rise to 1.5 °C will require almost all sectors of the economy to be carbon-neutral around the second half of this century. The carbon-neutrality principle implies that all man-made greenhouse gas emissions must be eliminated from the atmosphere through reduction measures. Carbon dioxide contributes approximately three-quarters of greenhouse gas emissions, which are primarily caused by energy production and industrial processes. Approximately 40% of all electricity is generated by coal-fired thermal power plants, and 30% of carbon dioxide emissions globally arise from coal-fired plants [1,2]. Thus, decarbonization of fossil fuel-powered power generation is an urgent task for the next two decades, see Fig. 1 [3].
Fig. 1 Power generation in the Sustainable Development Scenario, 2000-2040 [3]
Figure 2 depicts the shares of global final energy consumed by sectors: Globally, heating and cooling consume 51% of energy while transport and power consume 32% and 17%, respectively. For all sectors, fossil fuels remain the dominant source of energy, while modern renewable energy sources provide about 26% of power, a substantial amount more than 16% of heating and cooling, and 23% of transport. Nearly 100% of renewable energy in the power sector is in the form of renewable electricity [5]. As emerging economies continue to grow, renewable electricity continues to grow faster than any other energy sector.
Fig. 2 Renewable energy in total final energy consumption, by Sector, 2016 [4]
The purchase of 100% new renewable electricity is one of the most efficient methods of reducing the carbon footprint with regards to the need for stationary energy. Providing carbon-neutral power generation, solar and wind will soon surpass more mature technologies such as bioenergy, geothermal, and hydropower. This growing number of markets is the result of the continuing cost declines of renewable energy, for example solar photovoltaics (PV) shows the sharpest cost decline over 2010-2019 at 82% [6]. Concentrating solar power (CSP) and onshore wind are much less deployed, but auction results already indicate they will also be competitive in the coming 2-4 years. In spite of this, a large portion of the renewable electricity produced is intermittent, so it may result in an increase in the amount of non-dispatchable renewable energy produced. Consequently, the global demand for renewable energy storage is increasing. Hydrogen may contribute to the growth of renewable electricity, which in acting as a buffer to non-dispatchable renewable power can significantly increase the flexibility of power systems. It can help create a virtuous cycle for renewable-based power generation and supply almost 29 EJ of global energy demand by 2050 [7].
In fact, it is difficult to say that renewables and hydrogen production will be ready for scale, given the fact that fossil fuels will still account for the majority of the total energy mix at the end of this century [8]. For example, nearly 96% of hydrogen produced comes from fossil fuels, thus requiring an evolution of fossil fuelled hydrogen production. We must take an integrated approach to move power generation firstly towards carbon neutrality, where low carbon electricity and stable renewable energy are crucial.

1.2 The role of calcium-looping in carbon-neutral power generation

Carbonate material has been used for CO2 capture and storage (CCS) for nearly 100 years. Several excellent reviews have been written on the topic of chemical looping systems. Early on in the development of calcium-looping, the focus is mainly on CO2 capture and environmental issues [9]. It has recently been shown that calcium-looping is a promising and technically viable method of converting and storing energy, including the sorption enhanced reforming of CH4 into valuable H2-riched fuels [10,11], as well as a technique for thermochemical energy storage (TCES) for CSP [12,13]. As a result of the former, the carbon cycle can be utilized for H2 enrichment on a sustainable basis, whereas the latter will enhance stability, ensuring maximum profits from the increased use of renewable energy sources for power generation.
By combining CO2 conversion to H2-enrichment with energy storage for renewable energy sources, calcium-looping can contribute to the energy integrated utilization of CCS (EIUCCS). Those results support the rapid advancement of carbon-neutral energy to meet the current and future energy needs in transport, industry, and buildings [14]. Using calcium-looping based EIUCCS as a bridge between decarbonization and renewable energy sources, Fig. 3 illustrates an early example of carbon-neutral energy derived from energy conversion and storage.
Fig. 3 Schematic illustration of energy conversion and storage strategy for carbon-neutral and its potential applications [14]

1.3 The objectives of this paper

Calcium-looping are currently being updated, especially those that are involved in the integration of H2-riched fuel gas conversion and the role of TCES in the generation of renewable electricity. In this review, a major objective is to provide a guide for the development of integrated concepts based on calcium-looping for energy conversion and storage for carbon-neutral power generation. This paper is structured as follows:
·We will first introduce the background of calcium-looping, emphasizing its integration with cement decarbonization, the barriers to decarbonization, and the opportunities for calcium-looping beyond CCS.
·We discuss the research priorities of calcium-looping materials, in particular the bottlenecks affecting the reversibility, cycling, and round-trip efficiency of calcium-looping kinetics. It would then be possible to discuss strategies for improving material properties, and technological advancements in the design of multi-functional materials.
·We discuss the integration of calcium-looping reactors, followed by applications for integration. A particular focus will be placed on the latest developments in the conversion of H2-riched fuel gases via calcium-looping technology, as well as the role of thermochemical energy storage in stabilizing the generation of renewable electricity.
We discuss the transformation of traditional calcium-looping into a synergetic energy conversion and storage concept for carbon-neutral power generation. Issues and challenges associated with the integrated calcium-looping based EIUCCS are discussed. In order to achieve this goal, it will be necessary to develop multi-scale process innovations, ranging from the material level to the system level.

2 Background of calcium-looping

The CCS technology has been identified as a fundamental option for mitigating climate change [15], but has not been considered as a viable energy option due to its high costs. The noticeably lag can be seen from the deployment figures with only 110 MWe power CCS installed by 2016 [16]. After years of slow progress and insufficient investment, interest in CCS is starting to grow [17].
We discuss here the basic elements of calcium-looping, including the integration of cement into the power sector, the barriers of decarbonization and the opportunity of calcium-looping beyond carbon capture and storage.

2.1 Basics of calcium-looping

Chemical looping was first minted to reduce the irreversible combustion by metal oxides [18,19] and has been extensively studied. The essential idea behind calcium-looping cycle of sorbent to remove CO2 from a combustion environment or gasification process [20], origins from the use of lime to promote the shift reaction in 1880 [21,22]. Alkaline earth metal oxides (AEMOs, e.g., CaO, MgO, SrO, and BaO) [23] are likely to react with CO2 to generate their carbonates, see Eq. 1, which have drawn the attention of researchers [24,25].
${\mathrm{MeCO}}_{3(s)}\leftrightarrow {\mathrm{MeO}}_{\left({s}\right)}+{\mathrm{CO}}_{2(g)}\;\mathrm{Me}\;\mathrm{represents}\ \mathrm{Mg},\mathrm{Ca},\mathrm{Sr}\kern0.24em \mathrm{or}\kern0.24em \mathrm{Ba}$
For calcium-looping to be primarily used for post-combustion CO2 capture, the most commonly adopted process is constrained by the conventional combustion-driven flue gas that carries CO2 concentration close to 10 ~ 15 vol.% and 4 ~ 8 vol.% at atmospheric pressure in coal-fired and NG-fired power plants, respectively. The calcium-looping for CO2 capture post combustion is successively cycled between two vessels. The carbonation is contained in one carbonator vessel, and the regeneration is contained in the other calciner (calcinator) vessel, see Eq. 2 and Fig. 4.
${\mathrm{CaCO}}_{3(s)}\leftrightarrow {\mathrm{CaO}}_{(s)}+{\mathrm{CO}}_{2(g)}\kern0.24em \left(\Delta {H}_{298K}^o=178\; kJ\cdot {mol}^{-1}\right)$
Fig. 4 Schematic representation of the calcium-looping process suitable for CO2 capture from post-combustion flue gas (a), and gas-solid fluidized beds (b)
The use of coal under oxygen-rich conditions is recommended as a supplementary fuel for the calciner, see Fig. 4(a). Thus, the oxides will form again and will be cycled back to the carbonator, leaving an enriched stream of CO2 suitable for further sequestration and storage [26]. Gas-solid fluidized beds have been extensively used for their well-established properties of high bed-to-surface effective diffusion during reaction. A beam-down arrangement is a well-known concept, as schematized in Fig. 4(b) [27].

2.2 Barriers of calcium-looping for decarbonization

The development of calcium-looping for CCS has been reviewed in several reviews [15,28,29]. Various aspects of the process have been examined, including the improvement of the overall process performance from CO2 capture, issues of CO2 transport by impurity in flue gas that can significantly shorten the lifetime of the reactor longevity [28], as well as enhanced process integration through energy reduction or alternative configurations. There have already been several test facilities, including the 1.7 MW in Spain, 1.9 MW in Taiwan, China, 200 kW in Stuttgart, German, 30 kWth unit at the INCAR-CSIC, 75 kWth unit at CANMET Energy and 120 kWth unit at the Ohio State University [29]. The technology has developed rapidly over the past decade, especially since 2010. The study of attrition and material performance at a larger scale is likely to result in the development and validation of process models based on operational data [9,15,28].

2.2.1 Modelling works

Calcium-looping parameters and potential measures for optimization must be studied in an early stage of integration development, since the challenges of industrial scale remain unclear. An analysis was conducted concerning the integration of calcium-looping on fossil fuelled power plants (gross output is 1000 MW using bituminous coal) as compared with O2/CO2 combustion systems [20]. The hydrodynamics of a bubbling fluidized bed carbonator of Kunii and Levenspiel (K-L) model was used to predict the net efficiency. In this paper, a net efficiency of 1.4% greater than that of the oxy-fired combustor is reported. The system, however, did not consider some of the auxiliary equipment, which may have led to an overestimation of the overall thermal efficiency of the system. Based on the residence time distribution of particles cycling between the carbonator and calciner reactors, together with experimental data on the sorbent deactivation rates and the reactivity of the sorbent, a kinetic model was proposed by Alonso et al. [30].
The fluid dynamics of solids have been simplified in many models by assuming that solids are fully calcined within the calciner, and a characteristic time for solid carbonation has been defined. However, similar to many gas-solid reactions, there is increasing agreement that the carbonation occurs mainly in two stages, namely, two main consecutive processes for the carbonation. The first process is a fast kinetically-controlled regime, while the latter process is a slow diffusion-controlled regime [25]. It is therefore necessary to develop models for fluidized bed carbonator reactors that consider the bed hydrodynamics and sorbent properties together [31].

2.2.2 Cement decarbonization

Industrial processes contribute approximately 25% of global CO2 emissions, and the cement process accounts for over 5% of the emissions in the industrial sector [32]. The deactivation of calcium-looping sorbent from CO2 capture requires the making up of fresh material and a purging of unusable material, making it possible to combine decarbonization of fossil fuel-burning plants and cement manufacturing processes. Figure 5 shows the schematic energy flows of the proposed integrated system containing calcium-looping for CO2 capture in both fossil fuelled power plants and cement manufacturing factories [32]. Since lime manufacture accounts for more than 50% CO2 output in cement production, this integration implicit a potential synergy of calcium-looping for CO2 abatement [33].
Fig. 5 Schematic of the energy flows of calcium-looping integrated system for post-combustion CO2 capture and cement manufacture
It has been shown that cement can be successfully manufactured from CaO that was used in the calcium-looping cycle [32]. A laboratory study investigated the effects of repeated cycling on the formation of the alite phase [34]. Some authors [14] proposed a process for eliminating cement emissions by changing the cement making process, cement materials and/or by installing of carbon-capture technology. They also emphasized the challenges of the energy sources for firing the kiln with calcium-looping, as the composition of gases in existing cement kilns is difficult to manage, especially at very high temperatures (~ 1500 °C), and rotating kilns are not easy to control.
A pilot testing of enhanced sorbents for calcium-looping with cement production was also studied [35]. The capture performance of enhanced CaO sorbents was investigated at the pilot scale (25 kWth). It was expected that this synergy would lead to a significant decarbonization both for an exhaust power stations flue gas and cement industrial post-combustion gas. However, a detailed understanding of the system behavior under various operating conditions is not available, which necessitates the optimization of process parameters and the feasibility of a commercial-scale installation prior to its construction.

2.2.3 Power plant decarbonization

Figure 6 shows the capital and operational energy penalties of fossil fuelled power plants with CCS. These penalties are a result of the energy required to build (Ecap-CCS) and operate the CCS process (EO&M-CCS), where the operation steps include mainly separation, compression, transport and storage. A high projected energy penalty is the greatest disadvantage of most CO2 capture systems, giving these systems little flexibility to deal with fluctuations in the fossil fuel load, which limits their applicability at low capacity factors. For example, amine scrubbing technologies or oxy-combustion technologies have been shown to reduce the net efficiency by approximately 8-12.5% points upon integration into a fossil fuel based power plant [36]. This results in a 60% increase in electricity costs, hindering the deployment of CCS in the power industry. As a result, a great deal of progress has been made toward reducing the energy penalties of CCS for decarbonizing power plants.
Fig. 6 Energy penalties of fossil fuelled power plant with and without CCS at 85% capacity factor (calculated in GWh) [16]
The feasibility of a calcium-looping retrofit to a supercritical coal fired power plant has been evaluated [20]. There was a subcritical heat in calcium-looping system implemented for producing superheated and reheated steam at subcritical conditions. An estimated 33.4% efficiency was estimated for the retrofitted system. It was reported in an analysis that the efficiency penalty of calcium-looping operations ranged between 6 and 8 percentage points [29,36], which still need more energy integration techniques.

2.3 Calcium-looping beyond CCS

The carbon-looping approach would not only enable the decarbonization of cement production and power generation, but would provide many more benefits as it would accelerate the process of reaching net-zero emissions by incorporating technologies of energy conversion and storage.

2.3.1 Calcium-looping for energy conversion

In the production of carbon-free power through integrated CO2 capture and conversion in one chemical process, particularly the production of H2-rich fuel gases, the overall energy penalty should be reduced due to the improved process for energy integration and the avoidance of CO2 transportation between its emission source and its utilization site. Eq. 3 describes how coal can be gasified. Specifically, hydrogen is produced by reacting coal with oxygen and steam at high pressures and temperatures to form “syngas”, a mixture primarily composed of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Coal is a domestic and abundant resource in China, and thus using coal for the production of hydrogen in conjunction with CCS is a means to reduce the country’s total energy consumption as well as its reliance on petroleum imports. The calcium-looping process now involves a much higher level of technical complexity, but it offers significant potential for efficiency and economic improvements, especially for methane reforming, see Fig. 7.
${\mathrm{CH}}_{0.8}+{\mathrm{O}}_{2(g)}+{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_{(g)}\to {\mathrm{CO}}_{(g)}+{\mathrm{H}}_{2(g)}+{\mathrm{CO}}_{2(g)}+\mathrm{other}\kern0.17em \mathrm{species}$
Fig. 7 Pathways for H2-riched fuel gas conversion: WGS - water gas shift; SMR -steam methane reforming; DMR -dry methane reforming
Calcium-looping in SMR
In the steam methane reforming (SMR) for H2, see Eq. 4, calcium-looping is used to shift the CH4 conversion equilibrium toward higher H2 production via in situ sorption of CO2 in the water gas shift reaction (WGS, Eq. 5), achieving a sorption enhanced reforming (SER) of CH4, see Eq. 6.
${\mathrm{CH}}_{4\left(g\right)}+{\mathrm H}_2{\mathrm O}_{(g)}\leftrightarrow{\mathrm{CO}}_{\left(\mathrm g\right)}+3{\mathrm H}_{2\left(\mathrm g\right)}\;\left(\Delta H_{298K}^o=206.2\;kJ\cdot{mol}^{-1}\right)$
${\mathrm{CO}}_{(g)}+{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_{(g)}\leftrightarrow {\mathrm{H}}_{2(g)}+{\mathrm{CO}}_{2(g)}\kern0.36em \left(\Delta {H}_{298K}^o=-41\;kJ\cdot {mol}^{-1}\right)$
${\mathrm{CH}}_{4(g)}+2{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_{(g)}+{\mathrm{CaO}}_{(s)}\leftrightarrow 4{\mathrm{H}}_{2(g)}+{\mathrm{CaCO}}_{3(s)}\;\left(\Delta {H}_{298K}^o=-14.5\; kJ\cdot {mol}^{-1}\right)$
The effects of calcium-looping are shown in Fig. 8(b). When the temperature is below 800 °C, calcium-looping plays a greater role in the production of hydrogen from CH4 reforming because CO2 is captured by CaO, whereas above this temperature, the CaCO3 begins to decompose, causing SER reactions to fail, thus a decline in production levels.
Fig. 8 The production of H2 as a function of temperature with 1 mol CaO (red dash line) and without (black dash dot line) predicted by thermodynamic equilibrium modelling, a mole fraction of H2, inputs: 1 mol CO, 1 mol H2O; b product gas concentration of H2 at 15 bar pressure, inputs: 1 mol CH4, 1 mol CO, and 2 mol H2O [37,38]
Calcium-looping in DMR
The reaction equation for dry methane reforming (DMR) is given in Eq. 7 [10,11]. In DMR conditions, water generation is often present, so WGS reactions need to be avoided. The role of calcium-looping in DMR can therefore be explored as a potential CO2 feedstock for the reaction. As a result, it can be recovered from various gases after the water has been removed, as well as from various gases emitted by fossil fuelled power plants and large energy intensive industries [11].
${\mathrm{CH}}_{4\left({g}\right)}+{\mathrm{CO}}_{2(g)}\leftrightarrow 2{\mathrm{CO}}_{(g)}+2{\mathrm{H}}_{2(g)}\kern0.36em \left(\Delta {H}_{298K}^o=247\ kJ\cdot {mol}^{-1}\right)$
Calcium-looping in WGS for H2 enrichment
CO2 passes through over a bed of CaO at temperatures even below 600 °C at atmospheric pressure, resulting in carbonation, see Eq. 2. As a result, the removal of CO2 gas as solid carbonates (i.e., CaCO3) drives the WGS reaction forward by Le Chatelier’s principle, thereby eliminating the need for a WGS catalyst and enabling the production of high-purity hydrogen. A heat source is used to regenerate the sorbent under 900-1000 °C for the next cycle. Calcium-looping affects the mole fraction of H2 in the WGS reaction can be predicted by thermodynamic equilibrium modelling, as shown in Fig. 8(a). It predicts that the removal of CO2 from the gas phase may alter the equilibrium balance by calcium-looping, thereby increasing the mole fraction of H2. Similar to Fig. 8(b), the CO2 capture capability of calcium-looping begins to decrease at temperatures above 800 °C, and the H2 mole fraction returns to the level predicted for the system without calcium-looping.

2.3.2 Calcium-looping for energy storage

Renewable electricity, such as wind and solar power, can be decarbonized at a low cost due to decades of continuous cost reductions, particularly when retrofitted to conventional power generation systems. Power generation is expected to be significantly increased as a result of the use of renewable energy to support carbon reduction. It is also estimated that renewable energy will provide 85% of all electricity in 2050 [7].
In order to increase the share of renewable energy in power generation, their intermittent issues must be addressed. In recent years, the use of TCES technology to improve the dispatchability of renewable electricity resources has attracted a considerable amount of attention from researchers [13,39,40,41]. The development of TCES has been widely reviewed [42,43,44,45,46], which is broadly grouped into three types, sensible heat storage, latent heat storage and TCES. Sensible and latent heat storage are all dependent upon changes in material physical properties. For the TCES, heat energy can be stored through a thermal chemical reaction, which includes a charge step in the endothermic reactor and a discharge step in the exothermic reactor to release the stored energy.
Figure 9 summarizes the main advantages and disadvantages of three thermal energy storage technologies and the possible spatial and temporal distribution of their use. From the figure, we can also observe that each type of thermal energy storage technology has its own characteristics, and its efficiency depends largely on the degree to which the selected type matches the application.
Fig. 9 Schematic representing a brief summary and comparison of three thermal energy storage technologies (a) and possible temporal and spatial distribution in operation (b)
Calcium-looping based TCES for CSP
Figure 10 schematically illustrates the calcium-looping based TCES for CSP. This consists of three parts: solar thermal input, thermal storage, and thermal power generation, see Fig. 10(a). Calcium-looping based TCES is generally utilized to fill in the time/space gaps between solar energy load and discharge. In the calcium-looping example, the thermal input is composed of the heliostats field for CSP, and the thermal storage is comprised of a calciner, a carbonator, two reservoirs for CaO and CaCO3 storage, and a CO2 compression-storage system, see Fig. 10(b). The thermal power unit is powered by the CO2 Brayton cycle. Thus, in the presence of solar radiation, the received thermal energy leads to the calcination of CaCO3 into CaO and CO2. The heat produced by the endothermic calcination reaction is transferred to the products by the sensible heat of CaO and CO2, and the excess heat can be stored separately. When the sun is not active, CO2 and CaO are circulated into the carbonator to form CaCO3. The heat generated by the exothermic carbonation reaction is transferred by the CO2 in excess to a gas turbine for the purpose of generating electricity. Consequently, high carbonation pressures of CaO are necessary in order to maintain the energy (heat) release properties.
Fig. 10 Schematic representation of the calcium-looping based TCES for CSP (a), and the flow chart (b)

2.4 Summary

To achieve carbon-neutral energy utilization, we need to rethink the substantial gap between modelled expectations of a promising CCS and the actual practice established at a low commercial scale. Synergy through calcium-looping would further enhance the achievement of net-zero emissions by incorporating energy conversion and storage [15,33]. In the future, CCS may not only be utilized in challenging sectors with difficult emissions abatement, but it may also be employed in more strategic approaches for energy integration with power generating systems using a cost-effective CCS process [47].

3 Materials optimization

The purpose of this section is to introduce the research and development priorities of calcium-looping materials, and to discuss in detail the main bottlenecks which affect reversibility, cycleability, and the round-trip efficiency of their kinetics. There are also possible strategies for property enhancement of materials, as well as new technological solutions for multi-functional material design.

3.1 Thermodynamics, kinetics and bottlenecks

Materials derived from carbonate are low-cost and readily available from naturally occurring precursors. However, the cyclic stability of calcium-looping restricts their use, especially in the carbonation process with CO2 uptake. This low cyclic stability is primarily due to the degradation of carbonate-based materials. Similar to many gas-solid reactions, there are two main consecutive processes for the carbonation. The first process is a fast kinetically-controlled regime, while the latter process is a slow diffusion-controlled regime [25]. The carbonation reaction shifts towards lower values, as well as microstructural deactivation due to the closure of sufficient pores during the transition from oxide to carbonate. (e.g., CaO is about 16.7 cm3·mol− 1 and CaCO3 is about 36.9 cm3·mol− 1) [48]. When AEMOs reacts with CO2, a dense shell of carbonates is formed externally, which prevents CO2 from interacting with the core of porous AEMOs, resulting in an unreacted AEMOs remain inside, see the inset figures of Fig. 11 [49,50].
Fig. 11 Illustration for AEMOs cyclic decay with carbonation and calcination curves as recorded in a TGA [49,50]
The diffusional transport of CO2 through the pore network lowers the rate of carbonation with time after all the surface-available oxide has been covered with a product layer of carbonate, since CO2 is more difficult to diffuse in carbonate than in oxide (e.g., the diffusion coefficient ratio of DCaO/DCaCO3 is about 100). A kinetically controlled product is believed to be the carbonate layer. When the carbonates process is proceeded at high temperature, which is normally higher than their sintering temperature [51,52,53], resulting in a severely sintering out layer. The sintered carbonate layer contributes to the aggregation of the regenerated AEMOs particles, which leads to a reduction in specific surface area and pore shrinkage, ultimately causing performance degradation.
The kinetics of AEMOs reacted with CO2, varying between the carbonation and calcination processes, has been well documented [54,55,56]. Thus, much of the research has been focused on assessing the possibility of overcoming the loss-in-capability problem of these materials with respect to carbonate-looping. In contrast to CaO-CaCO3, MgO-MgCO3 thermodynamic data are inconsistent and exhibit a higher slop of equilibrium partial pressure with temperature, resulting in a narrow operating temperature; for example, achieving a CO2 capture efficiency 99% for the flue gas (pCO2 ~ 0.15 bar) need the reaction temperature of MgO at about 235 °C, which is quiet close to the thermodynamically unfavourable temperature for the decomposition of MgCO3 [56]. The high thermodynamic calcination temperature of materials also limits the application of AEMOs based carbonate-looping techniques. As shown in Fig. 12, the decomposition of SrCO3 and BaCO3 in CO2-rich atmospheres requires temperatures greater than 1200 °C and 1500 °C, respectively. Although they have a wide temperature operating window, the high temperatures make them unusable. Therefore, carbonate selection should be undertaken carefully and objectively.
Fig. 12 Equilibrium partial pressure of CO2, pCO2,eq, as a function of temperature for typical oxide systems [57,58]

3.2 Property enhancement

There are two promising strategies for enhancing the AEMOs based carbonate-looping cycle performance: use of solid and liquid molten salts, and most of these studies focus on the calcium-looping process, see Table 1.
Table 1 Presents a comparison of the different strategies for improving carbonate looping with AEMOs-based sorbents
Dopant Precursor /Dopants Synthesis Temperature(°C)/time(min)/gas Cyclic findings
CO2 uptake (gco2·gsorbent− 1) or energy density (kJ·kg− 1)
Refs.
Carbonation Calcination
Solid doping Limestone, dolomite /MgO Wet mixing by acetic acid 850/5/CO2 725/5/He Normalized conversion more than 0.7 after 30 cycles and improved overall CSP efficiency by simulation [59]
Limestone, dolomite /MgO Wet mixing by template 850/10/ CO2 750/10/ N2 energy density was ~ 2780 [60]
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O / CuO or FeMnO3-Fe2O3 sol-gel 700/10/50% CO2 in N2 700/15/ N2 Energy density of CuO doped only 237 after 20 cycles, whereas FeMnO3-Fe2O3 doped above 2400 after 44 cycles [61, 62]
Calcium naphthenate / Si, Ti, Cr, Co or Ce flame spray pyrolysis ~/5 ~ 10/30 vol% CO2 in He 700/30/ He Ce/CaO has the relatively high value of CO2 uptake [63]
CaCO3 / Graphite Wet mixing 850/5/CO2 750/10/ N2 Energy density was ~ 1333 after 50 cycles [64]
Calcium acetate hydrate / MgO “One-Pot” Recrystallization 650/20/20 vol% CO2 900/10/30 ml·min− 1 of CO2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.47 after 10 cycles [65]
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O/Mn Wet chemistry with template 600/45/50 vol% CO2 in 50% N2 700/20/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.53 after 25 cycles [66]
Calcium gluconate /Ca-Mn-Fe Milling 700/10/CO2 700/15/N2 Average energy density was ~ 1450 in 60 cycles [67]
SrO / SrZrO3 Sintering of yttria-stabilized zirconia 1150/180/CO2 1235/90/90 10 ml·min− 1 CO2 in Ar Energy density was ~ 1450 MJ·m− 3 over fifteen cycles [68]
high-purity limestone / Ca3Al2O6 or Ca4Al6O13 Ball milling 825/5/CO2 725/5/He 5 wt% Al2O3 composite optimized for calcium-looping conditions applied to CSP storage and CO2 capture [26]
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O / Ca2Fe2O5 Sol-gel 700/10/50% CO2 in N2 700/15/N2 Energy density was only 631 after 20 cycles [61]
Limestone / Ca12Al14O33 Wet-mixing 850-1000/5/1.3 Mpa CO2 850/10/N2 Energy density was ~ 2500 after 30 cycles [69]
Calcium citrate hydrate / Ca2SiO4 or AlCaTiO3 Chemical vapor deposition 850/10/CO2 850/5/N2 Energy density of Al2O3 stabled one was ~ 1500 after the 50th cycle [70]
Ca-naphthenate / CaZrO3 Flame spray pyrolysis ~/5 ~ 10/ 30 vol% CO2 in He 700/30/He Zr/Ca (3:10) was identified as the most promising material for CO2 uptake [70]
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O / CaSiO3 Bio-template method 725/5/He 825/5/ CO2 Improved multicycle stability for limestone, 19 wt% of SiO2 yields a reduction close to 13% energy density [71]
Calcium acetylacetonate / Ca3Al2O6 Template-assistant hydrothermal 650/20/20 vol% CO2 in N2 900/15/CO2 reduce CO2 capture ability after 10 cycles [72]
Ca(NO3)2 / Ca3Al2O6 Template-assisted hydrothermal 650/20/12 vol% CO2 in N2 900/5/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.55 after 30 cycles [73]
Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate / Ca3Al2O6 Template-assistant hydrothermal 650/20/20 vol% CO2 in N2 900/4/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.30 after 60 cycles [50]
Molten salts CaCO3 / KCl, K2CO3 or NaCl Wet mixing 650/15/ CO2 850/2/ N2 Enhancing effect followed the order KCl > NaCl >K2CO3 [74]
Hydromagnesite / LiNO3, NaNO3, KNO3 Wet mixing ~/60/CO2 450/15/N2 Average value of CO2 uptake was ~ 0.243 over 10 cycles [75]
Mg(Ac)2·4H2O / NaNO3-NaNO2 hydrothermal treatment 325/30/0.85 bar CO2 450/30/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.87 at 350 °C in the presence of 0.85 bar of CO2 within only 50 min [76]
Magnesium Acetylacetonate dihydrate / LiNO3-(Na, K)NO2 nonhydrolytic sol-gel reaction 340/60/CO2 450/30/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.53 after 10 cycles [77]
Magnesium hydroxide / (Li, K)NO3 Molten mixing 350/60/CO2 500/10/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.37 after 10 cycles [58]
Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate / (Li, Na)NO3-Na2CO3 / coprecipitation method 325/10/CO2 425/5/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.33 after 10 cycles [78]
Mg5(CO3)2(OH)2·4H2O / NaNO3-Na2CO3 ball milling 360/90/CO2 400/60/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.37 after 10 cycles [79]
Magnesium methoxide / NaNO3-Na2CO3 aerogel method 325/60/CO2 450/10/N2 CO2 uptake was ~ 0.30 after 10 cycles [80]

3.2.1 Solid doping

The role of solid doping arises from the boundary of inert dopants that may serve as a spacer to prevent the sintering of AEMOs during the CO2 reactions. The addition of polymorphic spacers (Ca2SiO4) reduced sintering effects, which promoted multicycle reactivity [81]. Based on this, it is possible that the pore-plugging capability of dolomite was facilitated by the presence of MgO clusters that allow CO2 to diffuse into the CaO porous structure. Even some impurities have anti-agglomeration effect when experimentally evaluating the use of chemically treated steel slag (containing CaO with impurities of Si, Al, Fe, Ti, Mg, Mn, and Cr). It was found that the material had a high cyclability when carbonation was carried out at around 850 °C under high PCO2 and calcination under inert atmosphere (He) [82]. CaTiO3 has also been reported as a solid doping that can improve cycling [83].
Solid materials start to sinter at or above their Tammann temperature, which is roughly about 50-75% of their bulk melting temperature. The carbonation temperature employed in the literatures (more than 700 °C) is greater than the Tammann temperature of CaCO3 (533 °C), therefore sintering among CaCO3 particles cannot be avoided under the given conditions. The melting temperature of refractory oxides play an important role in the cycling enhancement. Zirconia, ceria, and magnesia were selected as prospective refractory dopants due to their relatively high Tammann temperatures. Figure 13 shows the carbonation conversion of the different doped CaO during the first and 20th cycle as a function of the Tammann temperatures of the dopants [63,84,85,86]. It is evident that the cycle conversion increases as the Tammann temperature of “Refractory” dopants increases.
Fig. 13 Carbonation conversion of the different doped CaO during the first and 20th cycle as a function of the Tammann temperatures of the dopants [63,84,85,86]
It is essential to compare the stabilizing properties of different spacers under the same conditions, because inert solid dopping can be achieved in a number of ways. In addition to the Tammann effects shown in Fig. 13, a finely and homogeneously dispersed method is also essential to the cyclability. Besides the direct inert doping methods (e.g., MgO or Y2O3 doping for CaO) by solid mixing methods [26], uniformity can be obtained through the use of the following chemical strategies: (i) the interfacial solid solution formation with AEMOs (e.g., Al2O3 doping for CaO that can yield Ca12Al14O33 or Ca9Al6O18 [72], or ZrO2 form CaZrO3 [87]); and (ii) the solid salts doping, including carbonates, nitrates, sulfate salts.
The materials are first dissolved in a solvent (e.g., water), then homogeneous can be controlled by wet mixing, thus achieving uniformity of a solid salt doping after evaporation of the solvent [74]. A study has explored the use of calcium magnesium acetate as a precursor, which gives rise to platelet-like morphologies of CaO and helps to retain porosity after cycling due to the homogeneous stabilizing effect of MgO nanoparticles [60].

3.2.2 Molten salts doping

A number of studies have evaluated the effects of molten salt doping for AEMOs, recently [75,88,89]. These works focused on the modification of chemical reactivity of CaO or MgO with CO2, and the degree of promotion varied from salt to salt. Studies have shown that the CO2 uptake capability depends on the melting point of the molten salts [75,90].
Figure 14 illustrates the effects of CO2 uptake promoted by binary molten salts as a function of their melting point and composition. There was a clear correlation between the CO2 uptake and the melting point of the molten salt. It was believed that the higher CO2 uptake activity could be attributed to a higher mobility of ions in promoters with lower melting points [75]. Unlike direct solid doping, molten salt promoters have mainly two hypotheses put forward [88,89,91].
Fig. 14 CO2 uptake performance of AEMOs promoted by 10 mol% binary molten salts as a function of the composition of the coating mixture (and hence their melting point): a (Na,K)NO3, b (Li,Na)NO3, c (Li,K)NO3 for MgO and d (Li,K)2CO3 for CaO [75,90]
a) A molten salt layer serves primarily as a diffusion medium for CO2 capture. Due to a high concentration of oxygen (O2−) ions in the melt, the carbonate (CO32−) ions are formed rapidly, resulting in a rapid formation of carbonates on the surface of AEMOs.
b) AEMOs are likely to dissolve in molten salt. The process of dissolution leads to particle refinement and the formation of ionic pairs [AEMO2+···O2−], thus lowing the lattice energy barrier for carbonation. The presence of a multiphase interface (i.e., a gas-liquid-solid interface) may cause solvated ionic pairs to react and produce [AEMO2+···CO32−] pairs, which precipitate solid carbonates upon saturation. It has been suggested that one of the most challenging aspects of doping molten salts is determining whether the solubility effect can compensate for the loss of surface area of the AEMOs, as the surface area and pore size of AEMOs would be reduced as a result of melt wetting a solid surface [76]. Recent work to improve the CO2 capture ability of MgO by nitrates salts has observed a loss of CO2 carrying capacity due to some partial dewetting of MgO surface during the carbonation [92]. They postulated that the different wetting abilities of MgO and MgCO3 surfaces would lead to particle migration during carbonation, which in turn would result in less coverage by molten salt. This would be accomplished by using a porous support that confines MgO/MgCO3 particles and a molten salt promoter within the pores, thus ensuring that the contact between the solid and liquid phases is maintained.

3.3 New materials design

3.3.1 The structural doping

The effects of morphological modifications and microstructural design have been demonstrated in improving carbonate reactions, for example the macro-porous CaO-SiO2 composites made by bio-template [71], atomic layer deposition for Al2O3 on CaO [73], carbon gel-template, see Fig. 15. By forming pores at a smaller scale (~ 10 nm), this approach overcomes the pore-plugging effect that was described above, resulting in a higher multicycle performance. Thus, beside the solid and molten salts, the gas phase doping may result in a much smaller doped structure. The hydration process has been used to improve the calcination/carbonation cyclability instead of using direct dopings [49]. Some authors have hypothesized that the role of steam contributes to the fast step of carbonation reaction and that H2O serves as a catalyst [93], whereas others believe steam promotes carbonation via enhanced solid state diffusion in the product layer [94]. The latter hypothesis is supported by the mechanism: the overall reaction process is still limited by the slower reaction step; therefore, product layer diffusion becomes the reaction rate limiting step. The future microstructural design for AEMOs based carbonate-looping materials should be capable of producing a layer break-up effect during the diffusion control stage, see Fig. 15. The following two essential morphological characteristics are necessary for structural doping if the conditions for high temperature stability can be met:
Fig. 15 Schematic of the AEMOs-based sorbent structure design strategies based on surface area and volume change
a) A high surface area reduces the diffusion lengths of CO2 through the product layer. (e.g., measurements have indicated a critical product layer thickness of CaCO3 when the carbonation reaction becomes diffusion limited of ~ 50 nm).
b) High porosity to allow for the rapid diffusion of CO2 to compensate for the large volumetric expansion upon carbonation, as the molar volume of carbonates is much higher than the AEMOs (e.g., CaCO3 is more than twice as high as that CaO).

3.3.2 The intelligent screening

In some works, new materials were selected from a very wide range of solid oxide based materials that have desirable properties for CCS by computational prediction, then the selected materials were experimentally validated [95]. Figure 16(a) clearly shows that the Na-based compounds having the more negative ΔH and hence the larger Ep, than the Ca and Mg based compounds. The authors found that it was possible to use a single parameter from calculations to assess the relative efficiency and to rank materials according to their suitability for CCS.
Fig. 16 a Screened materials containing Na, Li, Mg or Ca as their alkali atom: the calculated energy penalty, Ep, for each reaction is plotted against ΔH, the respective binary oxides are cycled [95]; b Spectral absorptances of some composite materials [67]

3.3.3 The multi-functional design

Calcium-looping requires more strategies for functional applications, such as modified calcium-looping with some solar absorptances for CSP and bi-functional looping for increasing efficiency. Xuan et al. [62,67] designed and fabricated Mn-Fe oxides doped CaCO3 and investigated its performance, see Fig. 16(b). The experimental results indicated that the proposed material had a solar absorptance of ~ 90%. The proposed composite materials for thermochemical energy storage are expected to drastically improve both the solar utilization efficiency and cyclic stability of the integrated CSP system. Researchers have developed a one-pot template-free synthetic method to produce CaO/CuO composites for a bifunctional looping, through which the exothermic reduction of CuO with methane is used in situ as a chemical looping to provide the heat required to calcine CaCO3 for the calcium-looping [96,97].
The efficiencies of the SMR, DMR and WGS systems is not high only by using CaO material, because the carbonation reactivity and cyclic stability of the CaO materials are low. The use of the efficient calcium-based bi-functional materials is necessary. Anionic clays or hydrotalcite-like compounds have recently received significant attention due to their multi-functional properties. Hydrotalcite belongs to the family of double-layered hydroxides with the general formula of [M2+1-x M3+x (OH)2]x+ (An-)x/n·mH2O, where M2+ and M3+ are divalent and trivalent cations, respectively, and An- is an interlayer anion. Natural mineral hydrotalcite contains M2+, M3+ and An-, that is, Mg2+, Al3+, and CO32− with the formula [Mg6Al2(OH)16](CO3)·4H2O. A hydrotalcite structure is formed by Mg(OH)2-like layers separated by anions at the interlayers [98]. Near 250 °C, the hydrotalcite structure begins to lose water of hydration, and thermal decomposition begins. After high temperature calcination, the hydrotalcite show several significant properties including a large surface area, high homogeneity, thermally stable dispersion and synergetic effects. Since the compound has these special properties, hydrotalcite structure are widely used as catalysts, catalyst supports, ion exchangers and molecular sieves [99].
It is possible to synthesize hydrotalcite-like structure using a co-precipitation method at slightly elevated temperatures and constant pH levels. MgO-Al2O3-derived hydrotalcite-like structures have been extensively investigated for catalytic reforming. In addition, M3+/(M2++M3+) molar ratio, which ranges from 0.20 to 0.33, plays a key role in the formation of hydrotalcite-like compounds. Besides the commonly researched NiO-MgO-Al2O3 based catalysts for H2, the NiO-CaO-Al2O3 based catalyst has gained popularity among researchers because of its unique bi-functional property [100]. Due to the CO2 sorption property of CaO, it may be possible to shift the equilibrium of the WGS reaction toward a higher level of H2 production. The well dispersed, supported CaO species can thus work synergistically to enhance the steam reforming catalyst’s reforming activity and sorption properties at higher temperatures. Utilizing a hydrotalcite-like structure design strategy, Ashok et al. [99] have developed a NiO-CaO-Al2O3 catalyst. Furthermore, they aim to establish a synergistic relationship between NiO and CaO species during the synthesis process. A correlation was found between the sorption properties of the synthesized bio-functional catalysts for the production of hydrogen.

3.3.4 Reuse of industrial solid wastes

There are a number of low-cost industrial solid wastes, such as steelmaking slag, carbide slag and coal fly ash, that have different properties when reused for the capture of carbon dioxide. The steelmaking slag is an alkaline waste product that results from the steelmaking process. The mineral composition of steelmaking slag is mainly Ca2SiO3, Ca3SiO5 and Ca2Fe2O5. As these elements are difficult to dissolve in an aqueous medium at ambient temperatures, the reuse of calcium elements should be accelerated by increasing the reaction temperature, pressure, or even ultrafine pulverization [101,102]. Carbide slag is a solid waste product produced by the chlor-alkali industry. It is largely composed of Ca(OH)2, which requires a less intensive treatment than steelmaking slag. It is not only possible to get calcium-looping materials from carbide slag, but also to prepare calcium carbonate products with a high value-added [103]. Therefore, using carbide slag has become increasingly popular. The term fly ash usually refers to the industrial ash produced as a result of coal combustion. Depending on the coal source and composition, the components of fly ash may vary considerably, however all fly ash contains significant amounts of CaO and SiO2 [104]. Because fly ash formation conditions are harsh, recycling the CaO element from it is extremely difficult, which explains why coal ash reusing from power plants has been developed primarily for cement production in recent years [104].
CO2 reaction efficiency and cost reduction are the two main objectives of materials design based on industrial solid wastes. Solid or liquid phase doping for industrial wastes is still the most effective strategy for maintaining a stable CO2 capture rate. In addition, more recent studies have begun to study the synergistic mechanisms involving these industrial solid wastes, such as steelmaking slag and carbide slag for mineralizing CO2 [103].

3.4 Summary

We have attempted to define the current state of calcium-looping materials, focusing on the bottlenecks that affect reversibility, as well as the key parameters controlling the cycleability of the AEMOs based carbonate-looping kinetics. AEMOs based carbonate-looping materials must be carefully and objectively selected. Calcium-looping has demonstrated its potential, however, innovation is needed both in materials design, preparation and optimization, as well as in intelligent screening and technological solutions beyond CCS.

4 Integrated reactors of calcium-looping

Besides the dual fluidized-bed reactors, as shown in Fig. 4 section 2, several types of reactors such as membrane reactor [91,105], fixed-bed reactor [106,107,108], and moving-bed reactors [47,109] are reviewed when integrated with calcium-looping beyond CCS. The challenges associated with possible synergistic integrations are also discussed in this section.

4.1 Supported membrane reactor

There are a number of molten salts supported by AEMO that have the ability to operate at high temperatures as a result of their molten salt composition. At the present time, they are being tested for their application in the conversion of H2 enrichment by the SER process. Figure 17 illustrates a typical AEMO’s supported molten salt reactor, which is similar to a porous membrane reactor for SMR of methane. Carbon dioxide can be separated from a mixed gas feed stream. In this way, the CO2 and methane reforming processes can be separated in one reactor, which may provide greater benefits for intensification and cost reduction.
Fig. 17 Schematic of supported carbonate membrane reactor for SMR reaction [105]
Membrane reactors are likely to continue to attract attention. Nevertheless, this concept is still at an early stage with very low methane conversion rates at about ~ 8% mL·min− 1·cm− 2 for a nickel /alumina catalyst deposited on the permeate side [91]. Additionally, CaO supported molten salt is still limited to the membrane fabrication process.

4.2 Fixed-bed reactor

Figure 18 illustrates how a calcium-looping used in an adsorbent fixed-bed reactor combined with redox catalyst to separate the H-rich element and C-rich element from generated syngas, leading to a super-dry DMR of methane intensifies CO2 utilization via Le Chatelier’s principle [10]. In the CH4 oxidation step, Ni catalyzes the CO2-reforming of CH4 into syngas, and then Fe3O4 is reduced by syngas with the formation of CO2 and H2O. The separation of H-rich element and C-rich element here was achieved through the carbonation of C-rich element with CaO to form CaCO3 and Fe3O4 has been reduced to Fe. In the CO2 reduction step, the CaCO3 was calcined into CaO and CO2, and then Fe is oxidized to Fe3O4 through the reduction of CO2 into CO. In this concept, the highly concentrated carbon dioxide stream can be separated from the hydrogen gas stream, thereby enabling the capture and conversion of C-rich elements. This could result in a low energy efficiency of the reactor due to the regeneration of the calcium-looping.
Fig. 18 Schematic representation of DMR with calcium-looping [10]
Figure 19 shows a fixed-bed for the calcium-looping process for integrated CCS while simultaneously generating hydrogen and/or electricity from natural gas by SMR. The process employs the SER of methane using calcium-looping in conjunction with another CuO oxygen carrier looping in the fixed bed.
Fig. 19 A possible integration of the calcium-looping with SMR for power generation employing natural gas as energy source [110]
There are three steps for the integration using one reactor: A) the production of a H2-riched stream by SER of methane with the formation of carbonates. B) the formation of CuO by the oxidation of Cu with air but without decomposition of CaCO3 and C) the calcination of CaCO3 and the reduction of CuO with a fuel gas.
As compared to other methods, the simultaneous reduction and calcination step has the advantage of creating an exothermic reaction of CuO with CH4 that can be used to obtain the heat necessary for the decomposition of the CaCO3 formed in the same reactor. This could save energy and lead to a high efficiency that allow the use of moderate operation temperatures and the avoidance of complex heat exchange steps at very high temperatures. In our previous work, an enhanced H2 production was also achieved by in-situ CO2 removal using NiO based oxygen carrier looping to provide the heat for provide adequate heat to reactor as fuels decomposition and steam reforming in the fixed-bed reactor [107].
When metal oxides are used as oxygen carrier catalysts, however, their intrinsic reduction rate is much slower than the rate of air oxidation of the reduced oxygen carriers, resulting in a prolonged residence time in the fuel reactor. As such, this constrains reactor parameters, particularly in a fixed-bed reactor where the slow kinetics results in low utilization of the beds.

4.3 Moving-bed reactor

A bi-functional chemical looping process in a fixed-bed reactor offers several advantages over current technology, including a new auto-thermal process for producing high purity hydrogen as well as carbon management. So far, limited work has been conducted to operate continuously with cyclic reduction, oxidation, and regeneration reactions which are involved in calcium-looping and SER. For continuous reaction, there are several different reactors, and they are shown in Fig. 20 [107]. The oxygen carrier-looping integrated calcium-looping for H2-enrichment process could not be easily realized by circulating fluidized-bed reactor. One possible explanation is that the simultaneous fluidization of chemical looping is a very complex and time-consuming process.
Fig. 20 The comparison of the typical three reactors: a alternating fixed-bed reactor, b fluidized-bed reactor, c Moving-bed reactor [107]
By using moving-bed reactors, it is possible to characterize the simultaneous flow of oxygen carriers and CO2 sorbents [109]. Catalyst oxidation and sorbent regeneration can be carried out simultaneously under the same conditions.

4.4 Summary

The integrated reactors of calcium-looping are surpassing traditional single-function carbonate beds in terms of reduced energy costs and their potential to be applied to a variety of applications beyond CCS. It would be necessary for further efforts to be directed toward developing reactors that can meet the reaction kinetics requirements for large-scale demonstrations.

5 Integrated applications of calcium-looping

In this section, we review the calcium-looping technique for H2 enrichment in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs), as well as TCES for stabilizing renewable energy. It focuses on the most recent developments of the flexibility of CCS by integrated calcium-looping in power generation and challenges of EIUCCS.

5.1 Integrated with IGCC or SOFCs

5.1.1 The efficiency improvement

The production of hydrogen through calcium-looping SER is expected to contribute further to the decarbonization of the power sector. A hydrogen fuelled IGCC power plant with inherent CO2 capture based on calcium-looping process is proposed by Wang et al. [111,112] Fig. 21 demonstrates a system that uses oxy-combustion to regenerate sorbents in the calciner, and generates energy through a hydrogen fuelled steam cycle. It was measured that the thermodynamic performance of this hydrogen-fuelled IGCC power plant was about 42.7%, which is superior to conventional IGCC systems with net efficiencies of 36.3-38.8% and ammonia-based CO2 capture supercritical fossil fuelled power plants with net efficiency of about 27.9% [112].
Fig. 21 Integration of calcium-looping with H2 fuelled IGCC power plant [111]
In the coal gasified under H2 atmosphere, calcium-looping enhance the WGS reaction, leading to higher H2-riched syngas [113], which served as a basis for developing highly efficient, zero-emission power plants. Calcium-looping for both a pre-combustion CO2 capture and H2 enrichment has been studied in a combined cycle power plant [114,115]. In regard to the zero-emissions coal mixed technology with air gas turbine (ZECOMAG) technology, see Fig. 22, which is composed of four sections: chemical island, oxygen island, CO2 island, and power island. In the chemical island, part of the H2 stream is recycled from the carbonator to the hydro-gasifier, and oxy-combustion is employed so as to regenerate the sorbent while maintaining the operating temperature of approximately 700 °C for hydrogasification. In the power island, H2-rich syngas is burned with air in an open cycle gas turbine, and the discharged flue gas is used to generate supercritical steam. It was anticipated that ZECOMAG technology would have a net thermal efficiency of approximately 46.74%LHV. In addition to the steam compressor pressure and the calciner temperature, a reduction in the average sorbent conversion in the carbonator from 66.7% to 20.0% resulted in a 2.5% reduction in net thermal efficiency, which indicates that sorbent performance cannot be ignored when evaluating overall process efficiency.
Fig. 22 Schematic of ZECOMAG power plant with air gas turbine [115]
Two factors contribute to the enhanced efficiency resulting from this synergy. On the one hand, in the coal gasified power plant (e.g., IGCC), calcium-looping pre-combustion CO2 capture could reduce the energy requirement for sorbent regeneration owing to the higher partial pressure of CO2 in syngas compared to flue gas. On the other hand, the higher energy density of fuel gas conversion linked by calcium-looping is expected to promote the production of electricity using hydrogen fuel cells/gas turbines, which are more efficient than fossil fuel generators. Calcium-looping has shown a synergistic role in improving coal-gasified power generation; however, it still has a long way to go to reach cost-competitive hydrogen production.
One of the key aspects of the integrated process is the carbonates regeneration step, which requires continuous operation to allow for a cyclic process, e.g., avoiding the oxygen production in the energy-intensive air separation unit [96,97,110], leading to a large amount of energy needed to supply the regeneration step.
In distributed power systems and portable power systems, fuel cells are evolving as a reliable, clean and high-efficiency source of power. In the last decade, researchers have studied the possibility of using fuel cells in large-scale power generation cycles. To overcome the challenge of combining CO2 capture for H2 enrichment and high energy efficiency in IGCC power plants, an integrated concept has been proposed using high temperature SOFCs. There is some promise in this integration, since the heat generated from the fuel cell could be used as compensation for carbonate regeneration or hydrogen production, making it competitive with other zero-carbon electricity generation methods. Reducing costs is a critical issue for the long-term viability of the technology, leading to the development of SOFC technologies in integrated gasification fuel cell cycle and distributed energy applications to expand the scale of production to a level that benefits both. Both system optimization and improved fuel cell performance can contribute to increasing the competitiveness of the integrated system [116].

5.1.2 Techno-economic analyses of the comprehensive process

Using a physical absorption process to capture pre-combustion CO2 from an IGCC power plant may result in a 35-50% increase in its capital cost. A calcium-looping process was developed by Connell et al. [117] to reduce this cost, which utilizes syngas from coal as a source of CO2 capture and hydrogen production. According to their techno-economic analysis, calcium-looping can lower the cost of H2 or electricity by 9-12% compared to conventional CO2 capture and WGS. Calcium-looping offers an economic advantage due to the high quality heat produced in the process, which is recovered and used for generating electricity.
Although, the outlet gas streams can easily be integrated with calcium-looping technology to improve hybrid SOFC systems for efficient power generation, there is still a major challenge to be overcome when it comes to comparable scaling up of the SOFC unit for large scale power plants due to the cost and material constraints involved.

5.2 Integrated with CSP

5.2.1 The efficiency improvement

Sustainable energy sources are an important alternative source for calcium-looping integration. The majority of the relevant works are currently focused on concentrated solar power plants in which calcium-looping technology based TCES is used. To achieve a more efficient CSP plant, a super TCES system is required, since the traditional ones only contribute a small share of the thermal power required for the power system. Figure 23 illustrates the material evolution according to the technological concept development of thermal energy storage for CSP. The majority of heat in CSP systems currently is stored and transferred by heat fluid from solar receivers. One of the goals of CSP is to increase the operating temperature to over 700 °C [119], which improves the thermal efficiency according to the Carnot theorem, but requires higher thermal resistance of the materials [67]. Currently, oil or water/steam coupled to steam-based Rankine cycles at working temperatures typically below 500 °C, and molten salts as a heat fluid used for CSP are also limited to temperatures of ~ 550 °C [46,119]. It is possible to use calcium-looping as a solid particle to carry heat at temperatures over 700 °C, demonstrating great potential in the future.
Fig. 23 Evolution of technological concepts of thermal energy storage materials for CSP. The new generation of technologies towards to higher temperature enables higher efficiencies [118]
A calcium-looping scheme that integrates CSP has been proposed by some researchers [120]. They also evaluated different power cycle concepts, viz. directly integrated Brayton cycle and indirectly integrated Rankine cycle, finding that the former offer the best performance. For the purpose of improving the performance of calcium-looping based CSP, a scheme of integrated combined cycle has been recommended, as shown in Fig. 24. A calcium-looping based TCES has been evaluated and reported to have improved the plant efficiency above 45% [121].
Fig. 24 Detailed scheme of the CSP plant with calcium-looping in the combined cycles [121]

5.2.2 Techno-economic analyses of the comprehensive process

Calcium-looping based TCES could hoard the raw product: heat, allowing the CSP to produce more sustainable power [122]. The capital cost of CSP could be reduced by the use of TCES due to the smaller size of the energy integration system. More importantly, increasing output by being able to generate electricity after sunset will reap economies of scale. However, the closed CO2 Brayton power cycle integrated with TCES requires a more comprehensive optimization, including the turbine outlet pressure ratio and the kinetics of carbonate looping reactions.
TCES systems are capable of storing high amounts of thermal energy at high temperatures. Thus, they have the potential to increase the efficiency of solar thermal power plants as well as reduce their levelized cost of electricity. Bayon et al. [123] have investigated the potential of redox and chemical looping combustion reactions using alkaline carbonates, hydroxides and metal oxides. According to their findings, the most significant factors that affect the capital cost of the system are the energy consumption of auxiliary equipment and the feedstock cost. Additionally, eight TCES systems were identified as being competitive with molten salts, with estimated capital costs less than 25 $⋅MJ− 1.
The integration of calcium-looping not only offers a possibility for CO2 capture but can at the same time be implemented for TCES, a feature which will be critical in a future which will have an increasing share of non-dispatchable variable electricity generation (such as wind and solar power). Profits are derived from the sale of dispatchable electricity and from the provision of servers for the capture and storage of CO2 for emitters. Recently, an evaluation of the techno-economic impact of calcium-looping for TCES and carbon capture was conducted [124]. Based on the results, the breakeven electricity price ranges from 141 to − 20 $⋅MWh− 1 for different plant sizes over the course of 20 years.

5.3 The flexibility of calcium-looping based EIUCCS and challenges

Integration of renewable electricity with fossil fuel power plants will result in two operating modes, as shown in Fig. 25. When CCS is considered, the fuel saving mode generates less CO2 as it consumes less fossil fuel, as illustrated by the blue line in Fig. 25. When power output is considered, the power boosting mode generates more power than the base case, see the red line in Fig. 25. Nonetheless, both the fuel saving and power boosting modes would decrease the efficiency of operation. The two modes are difficult to achieve simultaneously, which hampers the transformation of fossil-fueled power plants [125].
Fig. 25 Operating modes for renewables integrated with fossil fuelled power system
In the calcium-looping integrated IGCC system or SOFCs for fossil fuelled power plants [126,127,128], there is a substantial amount of heat that has not been efficiently recovered and utilized. The calcium-looping in these processes is largely used for the low carbon enrichment of H2. If its function of the TCES can function simultaneously, it will provide more flexibility in the fossil fuel energy systems. Furthermore, it can also facilitate the integration of more renewables into fossil fuelled power systems.
The EIUCCS of calcium-looping would be essential to the development of carbon-neutral energy. There have been several studies which demonstrate that achieving the flexible EIUCCS is a challenging undertaking since the two different focus areas of calcium-looping must be integrated to achieve a combined objective. The existing calcium-looping based TCES cannot be directly applied to CO2 capture, since the CO2 is recycled during the process. The concept differs from CCS schemes described earlier, where the main objective is to capture CO2 and convert it. More specifically, calcium-looping for CCS focuses on ‘mass’, whereas calcium-looping for TCES focuses on ‘heat’. The result of this difference is that the calcium-looping fails to meet the dual kinetic requirements. Table 2 provides additional information when considering the case of calcium-looping. For TCES, in the calciner, the calcination of carbonates is accomplished in air, moisture or He, hence at much lower CO2 partial pressure, enhanced thermal conductivity of CO2 diffusivity, enable operated at lower temperature (~ 725 °C). In the carbonator, the concentration of CO2 is not imposed, leading to the carbonation conditions can be optimized to enhance the overall thermal-to-electric efficiency of the plant, in which carbonation conditions could be operated at higher temperatures (~ 850 °C) under pure CO2 concentration [13]. For CCS, in the calciner, the calcination of carbonates is accomplished in much higher CO2 partial pressure at higher temperature of ~ 950 °C. In the carbonator, the concentration of CO2 is restricted to the flue gas, in which carbonation is accomplished under ~ 15% vol.% CO2 concentration at temperatures of ~ 650 °C.
Table 2 Comparison of main typical condition for calcium-looping based CCS and TCES
Calcium-looping [30, 55, 104] Two typical conditions
Calcination Carbonation
Target to CCS (focus on Mass) ~ 950
~ 70 vol.% CO2
~ 1 bar
~ 650
~ 15% vol.% CO2
~ 1 bar
Target to TCES (focus on Heat) ~ 725
He, air or low CO2 mixture
~ 1 bar
~ 850
Pure CO2
1 ~ 5 bar

5.4 Summary

Further technical aspects are required. These include the development of novel calcium-looping processes as well as integrating the various process elements, from combining H2 enrichment and high energy efficiency in IGCC power plants to the thermal cycle of electricity production.
EIUCCS based on calcium-looping holds the potential to increase the flexibility of CCS through its linkage role with renewable electricity for the long-term objective of carbon neutrality power generation. There is an urgent need to address the challenges associated with calcium-looping based energy conversion and storage for the purpose of linking.

6 Conclusions

To achieve affordable carbon-neutral energy by the end of this century, immediate action must be taken, especially for power generation [129]. The interconnection of reducing CO2 emissions across all essential energy services and processes will increase greatly in the future. EIUCCS of carbonate looping maximize flexibility by synergizing with renewable energy sources, which is more important at the beginning of carbon-neutral power generation [16].
Research should be continued to expand options and reduce costs of the integrated systems at a sufficient scale. Consequently, renewable energy may potentially open up new markets that are quite different in terms of temporal and spatial distribution from the vast majority of fossil fuel uses. Energy conversion and storage will play an increasingly important role in the future integration into a carbon-neutral energy system, as shown in Fig. 3. The use of technologies like calcium-looping for this integrated strategy should be on the way forward.

6.1 Materials

Numerous efforts have been made to improve the cyclic properties of carbonate looping through material modification in recent years. The interest in calcium-looping materials has evolved from their use for single-purpose CO2 capture to their use for multipurpose carbon-neutral energy.

6.2 Reactors

The optimization of materials would benefit from the use of advanced computational tools; however, selecting a suitable material that can accommodate a wide range of operating characteristics remains a challenge. A future focus on the design and synthesis of improved CO2 carriers would fill the knowledge gaps between the engineering of better reactors and enable large-scale demonstrations of the calcium-looping materials. Typically, this would involve determining the best reactor configuration, sizing it up, and performing tests that match the ‘heat’ and ‘mass’ of the materials involved in the reaction kinetics in order to verify that integrated approaches are feasible.

6.3 Systems

In order to realize the linkage role of calcium-looping base energy conversion and storage, materials and processes in the integrated system must be able to demonstrate acceptable levels of energy efficiency in the future. There should be a greater emphasis on how to achieve the advance solid particles looping by reducing the operating parameters as well as the procedures involved when thermo-chemical processes are included. Typically, most developments of calcium-looping for this purpose are currently focused on feasibility studies through process modelling. It is recommended that the EIUCCS allow a greater contribution from renewable energy to carbon-neutral generation, and comprehensive studies of the energy penalty and efficiency should be conducted at the system level.
Abbreviations
CSP:Concentrating solar power;CCS:CO2 capture and storage;TCES:Thermochemical energy storage;EIUCCS:Energy integrated utilization of CCS;AEMOs:Alkaline earth metal oxides;SMR:Steam methane reforming;WGS:Water gas shift reaction;DMR:Dry methane reforming;IGCC:Integrated gasification combined cycle;SOFC:Solid oxide fuel cell;ZECOMAG:Zero-emissions coal mixed technology with air gas turbine
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51925604], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [52176210,51820105010], the Bureau of International Cooperation of Chinese Academy of Sciences [182211KYSB20170029] and the Cooperation Foundation of Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy [DNL202017] are gratefully acknowledged.
Authors’ Contributions
ZG, BD and LW drafted the manuscript. HC supervised and revised the manuscript. YD and YX contributed to the conception and revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the version published.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51925604], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [52176210,51820105010], the Bureau of International Cooperation of Chinese Academy of Sciences [182211KYSB20170029] and the Cooperation Foundation of Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy [DNL202017].
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.

Declarations

Competing interests
HC is an Editorial Board Member and YX is an Editorial Advisory Board Member for Carbon Neutrality. They were not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
1.
IEA (2019) Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019. Accessed Mar 2019

2.
Li Z, Liu X, Shao Y, Zhong W (2020) Research and Development of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Coal-Fired Power Systems. J Therm Sci 29:546-575

3.
IEA (2020) Natural Gas-Fired Electricity. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/natural-gas-fired-power. Accessed Sept 2022

4.
REN21 (2019) Renewables 2019 Global Status Report. REN21. https://ren21.net/gsr-2019/. Accessed July 2019

5.
IEA (2020), Renewables 2020. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2020. Accessed Nov 2020

6.
IRENA (2020) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019. International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2019. Accessed June 2020

7.
IRENA (2020) Global Renewables Outlook: Energy transformation 2050. International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Global-Renewables-Outlook-2020. Accessed Apr 2020

8.
Mac Dowell N, Fennell PS, Shah N, Maitland GC (2017) The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Chang 7:243-249

9.
Blamey J, Anthony EJ, Wang J, Fennell PS (2010) The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36:260-279

10.
Buelens LC, Galvita VV, Poelman H, Detavernier C, Marin GB (2016) Super-dry reforming of methane intensifies CO2 utilization via Le Chatelier’s principle. Science 354:449-452

11.
Tian S, Yan F, Zhang Z, Jiang J (2019) Calcium-looping reforming of methane realizes in situ CO2 utilization with improved energy efficiency. Sci Adv 5:eaav5077

12.
Duran-Martin JD, Sanchez Jimenez PE, Valverde JM, Perejon A, Arcenegui-Troya J,Garcia Trinanes P, Perez Maqueda LA (2020) Role of particle size on the multicycle calcium looping activity of limestone for thermochemical energy storage. J Adv Res 22:67-76

13.
Ortiz C, Valverde JM, Chacartegui R, Perez-Maqueda LA, Giménez P (2019) The Calcium-Looping (CaCO3/CaO) process for thermochemical energy storage in Concentrating Solar Power plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 113:109252

14.
Davis SJ, Lewis NS, Shaner M, Aggarwal S, Arent D, Azevedo IL (2018) Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360:eaas9793

15.
Bui M, Adjiman CS, Bardow A, Anthony EJ, Boston A, Brown S (2018) Carbon capture and storage (CCS):the way forward. Energ Environ Sci 11:1062-1176

16.
Sgouridis S, Carbajales-Dale M, Csala D, Chiesa M, Bardi U (2019) Comparative net energy analysis of renewable electricity and carbon capture and storage. Nat Energy 4:456-465

17.
IEA (2020) CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/ccus-in-clean-energy-transitions. Accessed Sept 2020

18.
Richter HJ, Knoche KF (1983) Reversibility of Combustion Processes. In: Efficiencyand costing. AmChem Soc 235(ch.3):71-85

19.
Zhu X, Donat F, Imtiaz Q, Müller CR, Li F (2020) Chemical Looping Beyond Combustion - A Perspective. Energ Environ Sci 3:772-804

20.
Shimizu T, Hirama T, Hosoda H, Kitano K, Inagaki M, Tejima K (1999) A Twin Fluid-Bed Reactor for Removal of CO2 from Combustion Processes. Chem Eng Res Des 77:62-68

21.
Anthony EJ (2008) Solid Looping Cycles: A New Technology for Coal Conversion. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:1747-1754

22.
Squires AM (1967) Cyclic Use of Calcined Dolomite to Desulfurize Fuels Undergoing Gasification. In: FuelGasification, AmChem Soc 69(ch.14): 205-229

23.
André L, Abanades S (2017) Evaluation and performances comparison of calcium, strontium and barium carbonates during calcination/carbonation reactions for solar thermochemical energy storage. J Energ Storage 13:193-205

24.
Wentworth WE, Chen E (1976) Simple thermal decomposition reactions for storage of solar thermal energy. Sol Energ 18:205-214

25.
Ge Z, Jiang F, Chen Q, Wang L, Ding Y, Chen H (2022) The role of MgO supported sodium sulfate molten salt for calcium looping thermochemical energy storage. Chem Eng J 444:136353

26.
Benitez-Guerrero M, Valverde JM, Sanchez-Jimenez PE, Perejon A, Perez-Maqueda LA (2018) Calcium-Looping performance of mechanically modified Al2O3-CaO composites for energy storage and CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 334:2343-2355

27.
Flamant G, Hernandez D, Bonet C, Traverse J-P (1980) Experimental aspects of the thermochemical conversion of solar energy; Decarbonation of CaCO3. Sol Energ 24:385-395

28.
Boot-Handford ME, Abanades JC, Anthony EJ, Blunt MJ, Brandani S (2014) Carbon capture and storage update. Energ Environ Sci 7:130-189

29.
Hanak DP, Anthony EJ, Manovic V (2015) A review of developments in pilot-plant testing and modelling of calcium looping process for CO2 capture from power generation systems. Energ Environ Sci 8:2199-2249

30.
Alonso M, Rodríguez N, González B, Grasa G, Murillo R, Abanades JC (2010) Carbon dioxide capture from combustion flue gases with a calcium oxide chemical loop. Experimental results and process development. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:167-173

31.
Sattari F, Tahmasebpoor M, Valverde JM, Ortiz C, Mohammadpourfard M (2021) Modelling of a fluidized bed carbonator reactor for post-combustion CO2 capture considering bed hydrodynamics and sorbent characteristics. Chem Eng J 406:126762

32.
Dean CC, Dugwell D, Fennell PS (2011) Investigation into potential synergy between power generation, cement manufacture and CO2 abatement using the calcium looping cycle. Energ Environ Sci 4:2050-2053

33.
Hills T, Leeson D, Florin N, Fennell P (2016) Carbon Capture in the Cement Industry: Technologies, Progress, and Retrofitting. Environ Sci Technol 50:368-377

34.
Dean C, Hills T, Florin N, Dugwell D, Fennell PS (2013) Integrating Calcium Looping CO2 Capture with the Manufacture of Cement. Energy Procedia 37:7078-7090

35.
Erans M, Jeremias M, Zheng L, Yao JG, Blamey J, Manovic V, Fennell PS, Anthony EJ (2018) Pilot testing of enhanced sorbents for calcium looping with cement production. Appl Energy 225:392-401

36.
Hanak DP, Biliyok C, Manovic V (2016) Calcium looping with inherent energy storage for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant. Energ Environ Sci 9:971-983

37.
Mcbride B, Zehe MJ, Gordon S (2002) NASA Glenn Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Species. NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20020085330. Accessed 7 Sept 2013

38.
Dean CC, Blamey J, Florin NH, Al-Jeboori MJ, Fennell PS (2011) The calcium looping cycle for CO2 capture from power generation, cement manufacture and hydrogen production. Chem Eng Res Des 89:836-855

39.
Ortiz C, Romano MC, Valverde JM, Binotti M, Chacartegui R (2018) Process integration of Calcium-Looping thermochemical energy storage system in concentrating solar power plants. Energy 155:535-551

40.
Ortiz C, Chacartegui R, Valverde JM, Alovisio A, Becerra JA (2017) Power cycles integration in concentrated solar power plants with energy storage based on calcium looping. Energ Conver Manage 149:815-829

41.
Ortiz C, Valverde JM, Chacartegui R, Perez-Maqueda LA (2018) Carbonation of Limestone Derived CaO for Thermochemical Energy Storage: From Kinetics to Process Integration in Concentrating Solar Plants. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:6404-6417

42.
Zhang H, Baeyens J, Cáceres G, Degrève J, Lv Y (2016) Thermal energy storage: Recent developments and practical aspects. Prog Energy Combust Sci 53:1-40

43.
Pardo P, Deydier A, Anxionnaz-Minvielle Z, Rougé S, Cabassud M, Cognet P (2014) A review on high temperature thermochemical heat energy storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 32:591-610

44.
Rathod MK, Banerjee J (2013) Thermal stability of phase change materials used in latent heat energy storage systems: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:246-258

45.
Jiang F, Zhang L, She X, Li C, Cang D, Liu X, Xuan Y, Ding Y (2020) Skeleton materials for shape-stabilization of high temperature salts based phase change materials: A critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 119:109539

46.
Pelay U, Luo L, Fan Y, Stitou D, Rood M (2017) Thermal energy storage systems for concentrated solar power plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:82-100

47.
Dou B, Wang C, Song Y, Chen H, Jiang B, Yang M, Xu Y (2016) Solid sorbents for in-situ CO2 removal during sorption-enhanced steam reforming process: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:536-546

48.
Naeem MA, Armutlulu A, Imtiaz Q, Donat F, Schaublin R, Kierzkowska A, Muller CR (2018) Optimization of the structural characteristics of CaO and its effective stabilization yield high-capacity CO2 sorbents. Nat Commun 9:2408

49.
Liu W, An H, Qin C, Yin J, Wang G, Feng B, Xu M (2012) Performance Enhancement of Calcium Oxide Sorbents for Cyclic CO2Capture—A Review. Energy Fuel 26:2751-2767

50.
Kim SM, Armutlulu A, Kierzkowska AM, Müller CR (2019) Inverse Opal-Like, Ca3Al2O6-Stabilized, CaO-Based CO2 Sorbent: Stabilization of a Highly Porous Structure To Improve Its Cyclic CO2 Uptake. ACS Appl Energ Mater 2:6461-6471

51.
Pacciani R, Müller CR, Davidson JF, Dennis JS, Hayhurst AN (2008) Synthetic Ca-based solid sorbents suitable for capturing CO2 in a fluidized bed. Can J Chem Eng 86:356-366

52.
Kierzkowska AM, Pacciani R, Muller CR (2013) CaO-based CO2 sorbents: from fundamentals to the development of new, highly effective materials. ChemSusChem 6:1130-1148

53.
Dennis JS, Pacciani R (2009) The rate and extent of uptake of CO2 by a synthetic, CaO-containing sorbent. Chem Eng Sci 64:2147-2157

54.
Alvarez D, Abanades JC (2005) Determination of the Critical Product Layer Thickness in the Reaction of CaO with CO2. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:5608-5615

55.
Barker R (1973) The reversibility of the reaction CaCO3 ⇄ CaO+CO2. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 23:733-742

56.
Dupont V, Twigg MV, Rollinson AN, Jones JM (2013) Thermodynamics of hydrogen production from urea by steam reforming with and without in situ carbon dioxide sorption. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:10260-10269

57.
Baker EH (1962) The Calcium Oxide-Calcium Dioxide System in the Pressure Range 1-300 Atmospheres. J Chem Soc 165:464-470

58.
Lee H, Trivino MLT, Hwang S, Kwon SH, Lee SG, Moon JH, Yoo J, Seo JG (2018) In Situ Observation of Carbon Dioxide Capture on Pseudo-Liquid Eutectic Mixture-Promoted Magnesium Oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:2414-2422

59.
Sánchez Jiménez PE, Perejón A, Benítez Guerrero M, Valverde JM, Ortiz C, Pérez Maqueda LA (2019) High-performance and low-cost macroporous calcium oxide based materials for thermochemical energy storage in concentrated solar power plants. Appl Energy 235:543-552

60.
Wang K, Gu F, Clough PT, Zhao P, Anthony EJ (2020) Porous MgO-stabilized CaO-based powders/pellets via a citric acid-based carbon template for thermochemical energy storage in concentrated solar power plants. Chem Eng J 390:124163

61.
Zheng H, Song C, Bao C, Liu X, Xuan Y, Li Y, Ding Y (2020) Dark calcium carbonate particles for simultaneous full-spectrum solar thermal conversion and large-capacity thermochemical energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 207:110364

62.
Da Y, Xuan Y, Teng L, Zhang K, Liu X, Ding Y (2020) Calcium-based composites for direct solar-thermal conversion and thermochemical energy storage. Chem Eng J 382:122815

63.
Lu H, Khan A, Pratsinis SE, Smirniotis PG (2009) Flame-Made Durable Doped-CaO Nanosorbents for CO2 Capture. Energy Fuel 23:1093-1100

64.
Han R, Gao J, Wei S, Su Y, Sun F, Zhao G, Qin Y (2018) Strongly coupled calcium carbonate/antioxidative graphite nanosheets composites with high cycling stability for thermochemical energy storage. Appl Energy 231:412-422

65.
Broda M, Kierzkowska AM, Müller CR (2014) Development of Highly Effective CaO-based, MgO-stabilized CO2 Sorbents via a Scalable “One-Pot” Recrystallization Technique. Adv Funct Mater 24:5753-5761

66.
Li S, Jiang T, Xu Z, Zhao Y, Ma X, Wang S (2019) The Mn-promoted double-shelled CaCO3 hollow microspheres as high efficient CO2 adsorbents. Chem Eng J 372:53-64

67.
Teng L, Xuan Y, Da Y, Liu X, Ding Y (2020) Modified Ca-Looping materials for directly capturing solar energy and high-temperature storage. Energ Storage Mater 25:836-845

68.
Rhodes NR, Barde A, Randhir K, Li L, Hahn DW, Mei R, Klausner JF, AuYeung N (2015) Solar Thermochemical Energy Storage Through Carbonation Cycles of SrCO3/SrO Supported on SrZrO3. ChemSusChem 8:3793-3798

69.
Sun H, Li Y, Yan X, Zhao J, Wang Z (2020) Thermochemical energy storage performance of Al2O3/CeO2 co-doped CaO-based material under high carbonation pressure. Appl Energy 263:114650

70.
Han R, Gao J, Wei S, Su Y, Su C, Li J, Liu Q, Qin Y (2020) High-performance CaO-based composites synthesized using a space-confined chemical vapor deposition strategy for thermochemical energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 206:110346

71.
Benitez-Guerrero M, Valverde JM, Perejon A, Sanchez-Jimenez PE, Perez-Maqueda LA (2018) Low-cost Ca-based composites synthesized by biotemplate method for thermochemical energy storage of concentrated solar power. Appl Energy 210:108-116

72.
Kim SM, Liao W-C, Kierzkowska AM, Margossian T, Hosseini D, Yoon S, Broda M, Copéret C, Müller CR (2018) In Situ XRD and Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy Unravel the Deactivation Mechanism of CaO-Based, Ca3Al2O6-Stabilized CO2 Sorbents. Chem Mater 30:1344-1352

73.
Armutlulu A, Naeem MA, Liu HJ, Kim SM, Kierzkowska A, Fedorov A, Muller CR (2017) Multishelled CaO Microspheres Stabilized by Atomic Layer Deposition of Al2O3 for Enhanced CO2 Capture Performance. Adv Mater 29:1702896

74.
Xu Y, Ding H, Luo C, Zheng Y, Zhang Q, Li X, Sun J, Zhang L (2018) Potential Synergy of Chlorine and Potassium and Sodium Elements in Carbonation Enhancement of CaO-Based Sorbents. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:11677-11684

75.
Dal Pozzo A, Armutlulu A, Rekhtina M, Abdala PM, Müller CR (2019) CO2 uptake and cyclic stability of MgO-based CO2 sorbents promoted with alkali metal nitrates and their eutectic mixtures. ACS Appl Energ Mater 2:1295-1307

76.
Zhao X, Ji G, Liu W, He X, Anthony EJ, Zhao M (2018) Mesoporous MgO promoted with NaNO3/NaNO2 for rapid and high-capacity CO2 capture at moderate temperatures. Chem Eng J 332:216-226

77.
Harada T, Hatton TA (2015) Colloidal Nanoclusters of MgO Coated with Alkali Metal Nitrates/Nitrites for Rapid, High Capacity CO2 Capture at Moderate Temperature. Chem Mater 27:8153-8161

78.
Jin S, Ho K, Lee C-H (2018) Facile synthesis of hierarchically porous MgO sorbent doped with CaCO3 for fast CO2 capture in rapid intermediate temperature swing sorption. Chem Eng J 334:1605-1613

79.
Zhang K, Li XS, Chen H, Singh P, King DL (2015) Molten Salt Promoting Effect in Double Salt CO2 Absorbents. J Phys Chem C 120:1089-1096

80.
Vu A-T, Ho K, Jin S, Lee C-H (2016) Double sodium salt-promoted mesoporous MgO sorbent with high CO2 sorption capacity at intermediate temperatures under dry and wet conditions. Chem Eng J 291:161-173

81.
Zhao M, Shi J, Zhong X, Tian S, Blamey J, Jiang J, Fennell PS (2014) A novel calcium looping absorbent incorporated with polymorphic spacers for hydrogen production and CO2capture. Energ Environ Sci 7:3291-3295

82.
Valverde JM, Miranda-Pizarro J, Perejón A, Sánchez-Jiménez PE, Pérez-Maqueda LA (2017) Calcium-Looping performance of steel and blast furnace slags for thermochemical energy storage in concentrated solar power plants. J CO2 Util 22:143-154

83.
Aihara M, Nagai T, Matsushita J, Negishi Y, Ohya H (2001) Development of porous solid reactant for thermal-energy storage and temperature upgrade using carbonation/decarbonation reaction. Appl Energy 69:225-238

84.
Xu Y, Luo C, Zheng Y, Ding H, Wang Q, Shen Q, Li X, Zhang L (2016) Characteristics and performance of CaO-based high temperature CO2 sorbents derived from a sol-gel process with different supports. RSC Adv 6:79285-79296

85.
Broda M, Kierzkowska AM, Muller CR (2012) Influence of the calcination and carbonation conditions on the CO2 uptake of synthetic Ca-based CO2 sorbents. Environ Sci Technol 46:10849-10856

86.
Daud FDM, Vignesh K, Sreekantan S, Mohamed AR (2016) Improved CO2 adsorption capacity and cyclic stability of CaO sorbents incorporated with MgO. New J Chem 40:231-237

87.
He X, Ji G, Liu T, Zhao M (2019) Effects of the Inert Materials on the Stability of Ca-Based CO2 Sorbents and the Synergy with Cement Manufacture. Energy Fuel 33:9996-10003

88.
Harada T, Simeon F, Hamad EZ, Hatton TA (2015) Alkali Metal Nitrate-Promoted High-Capacity MgO Adsorbents for Regenerable CO2 Capture at Moderate Temperatures. Chem Mater 27:1943-1949

89.
Qiao Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, Gao W, Harada T, Huang L, Hatton TA, Wang Q (2017) Alkali Nitrates Molten Salt Modified Commercial MgO for Intermediate-Temperature CO2 Capture: Optimization of the Li/Na/K Ratio. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:1509-1517

90.
Huang L, Zhang Y, Gao W, Harada T, Qin Q, Zheng Q, Hatton TA, Wang Q (2017) Alkali Carbonate Molten Salt Coated Calcium Oxide with Highly Improved Carbon Dioxide Capture Capacity. Energ Technol 5:1328-1336

91.
Mutch GA, Qu L, Triantafyllou G, Xing W, Fontaine M-L, Metcalfe IS (2019) Supported molten-salt membranes for carbon dioxide permeation. J Mater Chem A 7:12951-12973

92.
Jo SI, An YI, Kim KY, Choi SY, Kwak JS, Oh KR, Kwon YU (2017) Mechanisms of absorption and desorption of CO2 by molten NaNO3-promoted MgO. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:6224-6232

93.
Wang C, Jia L, Tan Y, Anthony EJ (2010) The effect of water on the sulphation of limestone. Fuel 89:2628-2632

94.
Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2010) Carbonation of CaO-Based Sorbents Enhanced by Steam Addition. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:9105-9110

95.
Dunstan MT, Jain A, Liu W, Ong SP, Liu T, Lee J, Persson KA, Scott SA, Dennis JS, Grey CP (2016) Large scale computational screening and experimental discovery of novel materials for high temperature CO2 capture. Energ Environ Sci 9:1346-1360

96.
Chen J, Duan L, Shi T, Bian R, Lu Y, Donat F, Anthony EJ (2019) A facile one-pot synthesis of CaO/CuO hollow microspheres featuring highly porous shells for enhanced CO2 capture in a combined Ca-Cu looping process via a template-free synthesis approach. J Mater Chem A 7:21096-21105

97.
Chen J, Shi T, Duan L, Sun Z, Anthony EJ (2020) Microemulsion-derived, nanostructured CaO/CuO composites with controllable particle grain size to enhance cyclic CO2 capture performance for combined Ca/Cu looping process. Chem Eng J 393:124716

98.
Harrison DP (2008) Sorption-Enhanced Hydrogen Production: A Review. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:6486-6501

99.
Ashok J, Kathiraser Y, Ang ML, Kawi S (2015) Bi-functional hydrotalcite-derived NiO-CaO-Al2O3 catalysts for steam reforming of biomass and/or tar model compound at low steam-to-carbon conditions. Appl Catal Environ 172-173:116-128

100.
Wu G, Zhang C, Li S, Huang Z, Yan S, Wang S, Ma X, Gong J (2012) Sorption enhanced steam reforming of ethanol on Ni-CaO-Al2O3 multifunctional catalysts derived from hydrotalcite-like compounds. Energ Environ Sci 5:8942-8949

101.
Chang EE, Chen CH, Chen YH, Pan SY, Chiang PC (2011) Performance evaluation for carbonation of steel-making slags in a slurry reactor. J Hazard Mater 186:558-564

102.
Chang EE, Pan SY, Chen YH, Chu HW, Wang CF, Chiang PC (2011) CO2 sequestration by carbonation of steelmaking slags in an autoclave reactor. J Hazard Mater 195:107-114

103.
Ma Z, Liao H, Cheng F (2021) Synergistic mechanisms of steelmaking slag coupled with carbide slag for CO2 mineralization. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 105:103229

104.
Kaithwas A, Prasad M, Kulshreshtha A, Verma S (2012) Industrial wastes derived solid adsorbents for CO2 capture: A mini review. Chem Eng Res Des 90:1632-1641

105.
Wu H-C, Rui Z, Lin JYS (2020) Hydrogen production with carbon dioxide capture by dual-phase ceramic-carbonate membrane reactor via steam reforming of methane. J Membr Sci 598:117780

106.
Dou B, Zhang H, Cui G, Wang Z, Jiang B, Wang K, Chen H, Xu Y (2018) Hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced chemical looping steam reforming of ethanol in an alternating fixed-bed reactor: Sorbent to catalyst ratio dependencies. Energ Conver Manage 155:243-252

107.
Dou B, Zhang H, Cui G, Wang Z, Jiang B, Wang K, Chen H, Xu Y (2017) Hydrogen production and reduction of Ni-based oxygen carriers during chemical looping steam reforming of ethanol in a fixed-bed reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:26217-26230

108.
Dou B, Jiang B, Song Y, Zhang C, Wang C, Chen H, Du B, Xu Y (2016) Enhanced hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam reforming from glycerol with in-situ CO2 removal in a fixed-bed reactor. Fuel 166:340-346

109.
Dou B, Song Y, Wang C, Chen H, Yang M, Xu Y (2014) Hydrogen production by enhanced-sorption chemical looping steam reforming of glycerol in moving-bed reactors. Appl Energy 130:342-349

110.
Abanades JC, Murillo R, Fernandez JR, Grasa G, Martínez I (2010) New CO2 Capture Process for Hydrogen Production Combining Ca and Cu Chemical Loops. Environ Sci Technol 44:6901-6904

111.
Wang D, Chen S, Xu C, Xiang W (2013) Energy and exergy analysis of a new hydrogen-fueled power plant based on calcium looping process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:5389-5400

112.
Hanak DP, Michalski S, Manovic V (2018) From post-combustion carbon capture to sorption-enhanced hydrogen production: A state-of-the-art review of carbonate looping process feasibility. Energ Conver Manage 177:428-452

113.
Hejazi B, Grace JR (2020) Simulation of tar-free biomass syngas enhancement in a calcium looping operation using Aspen Plus built-in fluidized bed model. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 99:103096

114.
Romano MC, Lozza GG (2010) Long-term coal gasification-based power plants with near-zero emissions. Part A: Zecomix cycle. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:459-468

115.
Romano MC, Lozza GG (2010) Long-term coal gasification-based power with near-zero emissions. Part B: Zecomag and oxy-fuel IGCC cycles. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:469-477

116.
Singh SP, Ohara B, Ku AY (2021) Prospects for cost-competitive integrated gasification fuel cell systems. Appl Energy 290:116753

117.
Connell DP, Lewandowski DA, Ramkumar S, Phalak N, Statnick RM, Fan L-S (2013) Process simulation and economic analysis of the Calcium Looping Process (CLP) for hydrogen and electricity production from coal and natural gas. Fuel 105:383-396

118.
Romero M, Steinfeld A (2012) Concentrating solar thermal power and thermochemical fuels. Energ Environ Sci 5:9234-9245

119.
Islam MT, Huda N, Abdullah AB, Saidur R (2018) A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 91:987-1018

120.
Chacartegui R, Alovisio A, Ortiz C, Valverde JM, Verda V, Becerra JA (2016) Thermochemical energy storage of concentrated solar power by integration of the calcium looping process and a CO2 power cycle. Appl Energy 173:589-605

121.
Ortiz C, Chacartegui R, Valverde JM, Carro A, Tejada C, Valverde J (2021) Increasing the solar share in combined cycles through thermochemical energy storage. Energ Conver Manage 229:113730

122.
Pelay U, Luo L, Fan Y, Stitou D (2020) Dynamic modeling and simulation of a concentrating solar power plant integrated with a thermochemical energy storage system. J Energ Storage 28:101164

123.
Bayon A, Bader R, Jafarian M, Fedunik-Hofman L, Sun Y, Hinkley J, Miller S, Lipiński W (2018) Techno-economic assessment of solid-gas thermochemical energy storage systems for solar thermal power applications. Energy 149:473-484

124.
Martinez Castilla G, Guío-Pérez DC, Papadokonstantakis S, Pallarès D, Johnsson F (2021) Techno-Economic Assessment of Calcium Looping for Thermochemical Energy Storage with CO2 Capture. Energies 14:3211

125.
Shagdar E, Lougou BG, Shuai Y, Anees J, Damdinsuren C, Tan H (2020) Performance analysis and techno-economic evaluation of 300 MW solar-assisted power generation system in the whole operation conditions. Appl Energy 264:114744

126.
Yang Y, Zhai R, Duan L, Kavosh M, Patchigolla K, Oakey J (2010) Integration and evaluation of a power plant with a CaO-based CO2 capture system. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:603-612

127.
Zhai R, Li C, Qi J, Yang Y (2016) Thermodynamic analysis of CO2 capture by calcium looping process driven by coal and concentrated solar power. Energ Conver Manage 117:251-263

128.
Zhang X, Liu Y (2014) Performance assessment of CO2 capture with calcination carbonation reaction process driven by coal and concentrated solar power. Appl Therm Eng 70:13-24

129.
Cloete S, Hirth L (2020) Flexible power and hydrogen production: Finding synergy between CCS and variable renewables. Energy 192:116671

Outlines

/