国内外运动事件研究进展与前瞻

doi:10.3969/j.issn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文聚焦国内外运动事件,运用可视化软件CiteSpace,分别对收录于CNKI及Web of Science数据库中2001~2011和2012~2022两个时段的文献进行科学知识图谱分析,发现国外学界较早将运动事件研究与认知科学及心理学相结合,成果丰硕;国内运动事件多学科交叉研究虽起步较晚,但围绕汉语运动事件词汇化模式的系列探讨,不仅有效完善了语言类型学体系,也激发了国际学界对汉语言研究的兴趣。分析还显示,与前一时段相比,2012~2022年间,国内外运动事件研究规模显著增长,理论探讨向实证研究的转向趋势明显,认知语言学视角下的跨学科研究发展尤为突出,二语习得与加工相关成果增幅显著。可以预见,未来较长时期内,借助眼动、ERP、fMRI等技术从认知视角探究语言与思维的关系以及参与运动事件感知与理解的神经与脑机制将是该领域的研究热点。不仅如此,运动事件研究成果与其他学科融合,还会为认知障碍康复训练、自然语言处理等提供理论指导和数据支撑,进而推动跨距较大学科间的对话与合作。

关键词: 运动事件, CiteSpace, 词汇化, 发展趋势

Abstract:

Aided with the visualization software CiteSpace, the paper conducts a scientometric analysis of the academic research on motion events, respectively sourced from CNKI and Web of Science during two time periods, namely 2001—2011 and 2012—2022. The results revealed that ever since the beginning of the 21st century, the motion event research had yielded fruitful achievements abroad within the fields of cognitive science and psychology; although domestic interdisciplinary studies started relatively late, explorations into the lexicalization patterns of motion events in Chinese had not only effectively supplemented the linguistic typology system but also stimulated international interest in the Chinese language. The results also indicated that compared to the previous period, the latter period (2012—2022) saw significant growth both at home and abroad, with a noticeable shift from theoretical discussions to empirical studies. Besides, interdisciplinary investigations from the perspective of cognitive linguistics developed prominently, and studies related to second language acquisition and processing also increased remarkably during the second period. In the foreseeable future, it will remain key research hotspots to investigate the relationship between language and thinking, as well as the neural and brain mechanisms involved in the perception and understanding of motion events using eye movement, ERP, and fMRI. Moreover, research findings of motion events can be applied to other disciplines, such as cognitive impairment rehabilitation training, natural language processing, etc., thereby bridging significant methodological gap and promoting dialogue and collaboration.

Key words: motion event, CiteSpace, lexicalization, developmental trend

中图分类号:

于翠红, 韩小溪, 陈志新. 国内外运动事件研究进展与前瞻[J]. 当代外语研究, 2025, 25(6): 160-174.

YU Cuihong, HAN Xiaoxi, CHEN Zhixin. Progress and Prospects in the Research on Motion Events at Home and Abroad[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2025, 25(6): 160-174.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 43

[1]	Brown, A. & M. Gullberg. 2011. Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of Path among Japanese learners of English[J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1): 79-94. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000064 URL
[2]	Bunger, A., D. Skordos, J. Trueswell, et al. 2021. How children attend to events before speaking: Crosslinguistic evidence from the motion domain[J]. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1): 1-22.
[3]	Cacciari, C., N. Bolognini, I. Senna, et al. 2011. Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study[J]. Brain & Language 119(3): 149-157.
[4]	Cadierno, T. & K. Lund. eds.). 2004. Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework[A]. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, et al. (eds.). Form-meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition[C]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 139-154.
[5]	Chen, L. & J. Guo. 2009. Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9): 1749-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.015 URL
[6]	Choi, S. & M. Bowerman. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns[J]. Cognition 41(1-3): 83-121. pmid: 1790656
[7]	Deng, Y. & H. Zhu. 2020. To move or not to move: An ERP study on the processing of fictive and literal motion expressions[J]. Lingua 244: 102908. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102908 URL
[8]	Egorova, E., T. Tenbrink & R. S. Purves. 2018. Fictive motion in the context of mountaineering[J]. Spatial Cognition & Computation 18(4): 259-284.
[9]	Fernandez, R., A. Monacelli & C. J. Duffy. 2013. Visual motion event related potentials distinguish aging and Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 36(1): 177-83. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122053 URL
[10]	Flecken, M., M. Carroll, K. Weimar, et al. 2015. Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French—German L2 users[J]. The Modern Language Journal 99(S1): 100-122. doi: 10.1111/mono.v99.s1 URL
[11]	Göksun, T., M. Lehet, K. Malykhina, et al. 2015. Spontaneous gesture and spatial language: Evidence from focal brain injury[J]. Brain & Language 150: 1-13.
[12]	Ji, Y., & J. Hohenstein. 2018. English and Chinese children’s motion event similarity judgments[J]. Cognitive Linguistics 29(1): 45-76. doi: 10.1515/cog-2016-0151 URL
[13]	Kamenetski, A., V. T. Lai & M. Flecken. 2022. Minding the manner: Attention to motion events in Turkish-Dutch early bilinguals[J]. Language and Cognition 14 (3): 456-478.
[14]	Kısa, Y. D., S. Goldin-Meadow & D. Casasanto. 2022. Do gestures really facilitate speech production?[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 151(6): 1252-1271.
[15]	Lewandowski, W. & Özçalìʂkan. 2021. How language type influences patterns of motion expression in bilingual speakers[J]. Second Language Research 37(1): 27-50. doi: 10.1177/0267658319877214 URL
[16]	Lewandowski, W. 2020. Bilingual patterns of path encoding: A study of Polish L1-German L2 and Polish L1-Spanish L2 speakers[J]. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60(3): 679-698. doi: 10.1515/iral-2019-0127 URL
[17]	Lin, N., Y. Bi Y. Zhao, et al. 2015. The theory-of-mind network in support of action verb comprehension: Evidence from an fMRI study[J]. Brain & Language 141: 1-10.
[18]	Slobin, D. I. 1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish[A]. In M.Shibatani & S. A.Thompson (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning[C]. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 195-219.
[19]	Slobin, D. I. 2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism[A]. In S.Neimeier & R.Dirven (eds.). Evidence for Linguistic Relativity[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 107-138.
[20]	Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog:Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events[A]. In S.Strömqvist & L.Verhoeven (eds.). Relating Events in Narrative. Typological and Contextual Perspectives[C]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 219-257.
[21]	Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization pattern: Semantic structure in lexical forms[A]. In T.Shopen(ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (Vol. 3)[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 36-149.
[22]	Talmy, L. 2000a. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[23]	Talmy, L. 2000b. Toward a Cognitive Semantics (Vol. II): Typology and Process in Concept Structuring[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[24]	Treffers-Daller, J. & F. Aveledo. 2023. Approaching motion in a second language: how bilinguals restructure motion event expressions inside and outside the classroom[J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61(1): 1-12. doi: 10.1515/iral-2023-0006 URL
[25]	Villwock, A., D. Bottari & B. Röder. 2022. Event-related potential correlates of visuo-tactile motion processing in congenitally deaf humans[J]. Neuropsychologia 170(10): 108209. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108209 URL
[26]	Zhang, Y., R. Lemarchand, A. Asyraff, et al. 2022. Representation of motion concepts in occipitotemporal cortex: fMRI activation, decoding and connectivity analyses[J]. NeuroImage 259(10): 119450. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119450 URL
[27]	谷峪、林正军. 2020. 中国英语学习者运动事件编码的修辞风格研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(2): 93-101,160.
[28]	郝美玲、王芬. 2015. 来自不同语言类型的学习者叙述汉语运动事件的实验研究[J]. 世界汉语教学(1): 83-94.
[29]	纪瑛琳. 2020. 英汉二语习得者的空间运动事件认知——来自行为实验的证据[J]. 现代外语(5): 654-666.
[30]	李恒、曹宇. 2015. 中国高水平英语学习者指示性手势研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(4): 51-58, 160.
[31]	李杰、陈超美. 2016. CiteSpace: 科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学出版社.
[32]	李天宇. 2020. 汉语运动事件词化类型研究中的几个问题[J]. 当代语言学(3): 395-410.
[33]	刘雪卉、陈亚平. 2021. 中国英语学习者运动事件的双向概念迁移研究[J]. 外语教学与研究(3): 387-399,479.
[34]	彭宣维、高继华. 2023. 论量子化的事件运动轨迹[J]. 当代外语研究(5): 43-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.05.005
[35]	沈家煊. 2003. 现代汉语“动补结构”的类型学考察[J]. 世界汉语教学(3): 17-23,2.
[36]	史文磊. 2012. 汉语运动事件词化类型研究综观[J]. 当代语言学(1): 49-65,110.
[37]	吴建伟、潘艳艳. 2017. 英、汉、日运动事件动词的句法——语义比较研究[J]. 外语研究(2): 57-62.
[38]	徐萌敏、李福印. 2022. 基于汉语动补结构的事件融合研究——以“V回”结构表征宏事件为例[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报(2): 49-58.
[39]	于翠红、张拥政. 2017. 中国学习者在线加工英语运动事件表达中的启动效应与认知机制研究[J]. 外语教学与研究(3): 416-427,481.
[40]	于翠红、张拥政. 2020. 中国学习者英语位移事件加工中的动词与结构效应[J]. 现代外语(6): 818-829.
[41]	曾永红、白解红. 2013. 中国学生英语运动事件表达习得研究[J]. 外语与外语教学(6): 44-48.
[42]	张拥政、于翠红. 2017. 自发运动事件在线加工中的跨语言差异[J]. 现代外语(6): 778-789,873.
[43]	赵晨、林琳、郑琴. 2023. 英语二语产出中言语计划的生成及其向句子结构的投射[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(2): 11-19,160.

来源
CNKI	2001—2011	4532	141	空间(关系/构式)、运动/动态(事件)、位移(表达/事件)、致使(事件)
CNKI	2012—2022	5254	324	空间(关系/构式)、运动/动态(事件)、位移(表达/事件)、致使(事件)
WOS	2001—2011	932357	116	Spatial (relation/construction), motion/dynamic (event), locational expression/event, caused (event)
WOS	2012—2022	2487272	344