网络出版日期: 2023-06-01
基金资助
*2019年度国家社科基金项目“现实观照下国际难民文学的伦理学批评研究”的阶段性成果(19BWW088)
Pursuing the Great Harmony in Aesthetic Appreciation: Foreign Literature Education and Chinese National Consciousness Cultivation
李昀, 周娉娣 . 于美美与共中求大同:外国文学教育与国家意识培养[J]. 当代外语研究, 2023 , 23(2) : 97 -105 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.02.009
How can foreign literature education impose the cultivation of Chinese national consciousness? Will it endanger literary autonomy, academic independence, and the development of foreign language disciplines? These doubts are probably the underlying reasons for the silence of the foreign literary community on the issue of national consciousness. However, we should realize that the Western autonomy theory arises because its limited national consciousness limits the ideal of literature to the vast. Chinese national consciousness, on the contrary, contains the consciousness of human community and seeks the Great Harmony of the world, which is consistent with the infinity of the literary ideal. In this regard, foreign literature teaching naturally includes the cultivation of Chinese national consciousness, because it stimulates the aesthetic sensus communis and promotes the dialogue between aesthetic and ethical ideals, searching for the ethical foundation of the future human community. In short, it seeks the Great Harmony in aesthetic appreciation.
| [1] | Adorno T.W. 1997. Aesthetic Theory (trans. by R. Hullot-Kentor)[M]. New York & London: The Athlone Press Ltd. |
| [2] | Berryman J. 2020. Era Pound’s Aesthetics and The Origins of Modernism[M]. Brighton: Edward Everett Root Publishers. |
| [3] | Derrida J. 2001. On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness (trans. by M. Dooley & M.Hughes)[M]. London:Routledge. |
| [4] | Eagleton T. 2003. After Theory[M]. New York: Basic Books. |
| [5] | Nancy J. 2000. Being Singular Plural[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press. |
| [6] | 柏拉图. 2003. 国家篇(王晓朝译)[A]. 柏拉图全集卷二[C]. 北京: 人民出版社.270-648. |
| [7] | 费孝通. 1997. 反思·对话·文化自觉[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(3): 15-22. |
| [8] | 康德. 2002. 判断力批判(邓晓芒译)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社. |
| [9] | 康德. 2004. 实践理性批判(邓晓芒译)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社. |
| [10] | 孔子. 2007. 论语(张燕婴译注)[M]. 北京: 中华书局. |
| [11] | 李锋亮. 2019. 教育要面向现代化,面向世界, 面向未来[N]. 中国教育新闻网[2022-08-24]. http://www.jyb.cn/rmtzgjyb/201909/t20190924_262991.html. |
| [12] | 李昀. 2021. 感同身受的共同体:论阮清越的大同主义伦理选择[J]. 文学跨学科研究(5.1):76-88. |
| [13] | 李昀、 王瑾妍. 2020. 无我抑或忘我:人类共同体的伦理基础初探[J]. 当代外语研究(4):107-117. |
| [14] | 陆九渊. 1992. 陆象山全集[M]. 北京: 中国书店. |
| [15] | 卢梭. 2003. 社会契约论(何兆武译)[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆. |
| [16] | 孟子. 2007. 孟子(万丽华、蓝旭译注)[M]. 北京: 中华书局. |
| [17] | 曲卫国. 2022. 国家意识与学科发展[J]. 当代外语研究(1):18-26. |
| [18] | 王阳明. 2011. 大学问[A].吴光等.王阳明全集[C]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.935-942. |
| [19] | 谢有顺. 2010. 从密室到旷野:中国当代文学的精神转型[M]. 福州: 海峡文艺出版社 |
| [20] | 薛荷仙、 李昀. 2022. 回归国家意识的价值教育和课程思政本质[J]. 当代外语研究(3):11-19. |
| [21] | 雅斯贝尔斯. 1991. 什么是教育 (邹进译)[M]. 北京: 三联书店出版社. |
| [22] | 杨枫. 2020. 外语教育国家意识的文化政治学阐释[J]. 当代外语研究(6):1-2. |
| [23] | 张再林. 2019. 康德的“审美共通感”、中国古代的“感应”与政治的美学化[J]. 学术研究(10):14-24. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |