多外语学习与创造性思维发展:个案研究
网络出版日期: 2025-08-26
基金资助
* 2024年国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国三语者创造性思维发展研究”(批准号 24BYY132)
Multiple Foreign Language Learners’ Creative Thinking Development: A Case Study
本研究探讨了多外语学习者创造性思维的发展特征及其影响因素,重点关注创造性思维在跨语言迁移中的表现及正规课堂环境对其发展的影响。基于多个案质性研究方法,研究对13名多外语学习者进行了两轮单独访谈,并收集了相关文本资料。研究者发现,多外语学习者的创造性思维迁移更倾向于聚敛式思维,即学习者在学习第二外语时会优先筛选和整合母语及第一外语经验,而非完全发散式地探索。此外,正规课堂教学环境的去个性化特征对创造性思维的发展构成一定限制,表现为课堂互动中少数派观点的缺失以及从众顺应现象显著,进而抑制了学习者的认知灵活性和创造性表达。可见,多门外语学习经历的高度同质性可能促发了路径依赖,使学习者在新语言学习中更依赖稳定的认知框架,而非探索性策略。同时,课程与教学跨越不同外语的这种同质性在一定程度上也弱化了第一外语在创造性思维迁移中的作用,促使学习者更多回溯更为迥异的母语经验,以寻找创新性学习策略。因此,我们应重新审视课程与教学在外语学习者自主性和创造性思维发展中的作用,并倡导更具灵活性和多样性的学习模式。
徐浩 . 多外语学习与创造性思维发展:个案研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2025 , 25(4) : 76 -87 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.04.007
This study examines the development of creative thinking in multilingual learners and its influencing factors, with a particular focus on the role of cross-linguistic transfer and the impact of formal classroom environments. Employing a multiple-case qualitative research design, the study conducted two rounds of individual interviews with 13 multilingual learners and collected relevant textual data. The findings reveal that multilingual learners exhibit a convergence-oriented pattern in creative thinking transfer, wherein they prioritize selecting and integrating experiences from their native language (L1) and first foreign language (L2) when learning a second foreign language (L3), rather than engaging in entirely divergent exploration. Furthermore, the depersonalized nature of formal classroom instruction imposes constraints on the development of creative thinking, as evidenced by the absence of minority perspectives in classroom interactions and the predominance of compliance over cognitive transformation. These findings suggest that the high degree of homogeneity in multilingual learning experiences may reinforce path dependence, leading learners to rely more on stable cognitive frameworks rather than exploratory strategies in learning a new language. Similarly, the cross-linguistic uniformity of curricula and instructional practices weakens the role of L2 in creative thinking transfer, prompting learners to draw more extensively from their structurally distinct L1 experiences in developing innovative learning strategies. These insights highlight the need to critically reassess the role of curriculum and pedagogy in promoting learner autonomy and creative thinking in foreign language education, thus advocating for more flexible and diverse learning models.
| [1] | Adi-Japha, E., J. Berberich-Artzi & A. Libnawi. 2021. Cognitive flexibility in drawings of bilingual children[J]. Child Development 81(5): 1356-1366. |
| [2] | Booton, S. A., E. Hoicka, A. M. O’Grady, et al. 2021. Children’s divergent thinking and bilingualism[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity 41: 100918. |
| [3] | Coffey, S. & C. Leung. 2019. Understanding agency and constraints in the conception of creativity in the language classroom[J]. Applied Linguistics Review 11(4): 607-623. |
| [4] | Creo, E, de P., M. Mareque & M. Pino-Juste. 2023. Deciphering the role of multilingualism in creativity at university: The influence of context[J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61(3): 995-1020. |
| [5] | Fürst, G. & F. Grin. 2023. Multilingualism, multicultural experience, cognition, and creativity[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1155158. |
| [6] | Grundy, J. G. 2020. The effects of bilingualism on executive functions: An updated quantitative analysis[J]. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 4: 177-199. |
| [7] | Hommel, B., R. Fischer, & I. K. Christoffels. 2011. Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 273. |
| [8] | Jackendoff, R. 1994. Patterns in the Mind: Language and Human Nature[M]. New York: Basic Books. |
| [9] | Klein, A. & T. Badia. 2024. Where divergent ideas converge: Answers to AUT found on short list of word co-occurrences terms[J]. Creativity Research Journal 36(1): 138-154. |
| [10] | Lee, C. S. & D. J. Therriault. 2013. The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes[J]. Intelligence 41(5): 306-320. |
| [11] | Liao, Y. H., Y. L. Chen, H. C. Chen, et al. 2018. Infusing creative pedagogy into an English as a foreign language classroom: Learning performance, creativity, and motivation[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity 29: 213-223. |
| [12] | Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman & J. Salda?a. 2020. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th edn.)[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage. |
| [13] | Nefdt, R. M. 2020. The role of language in the cognitive sciences [A]. In R. M. Nefdt, C. Klippi & B. Karstens (eds.). The Philosophy and Science of Language[C]. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 215-238. |
| [14] | Padalia, D. 2014. Conformity bias: A fact or an experimental artifact?[J]. Psychological Studies 59(3): 223-230. |
| [15] | Runco, M. A. & S. Acar. 2012. Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential[J]. Creativity Research Journal 24(1): 66-75. |
| [16] | Torrance, E. P. 1972. Predictive validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior 6(4): 236-262. |
| [17] | Van Dijk, M., E. H. Kroesbergen, E. Blom, et al. 2019. Bilingualism and creativity: Towards a situated cognition approach[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior 53(2): 178-188. |
| [18] | Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
| [19] | Xia, T., Y. An & J. Guo. 2022. Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits from cognitive inhibition and cognitive flexibility[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 1016777. |
| [20] | Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th edn.)[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage. |
| [21] | Zhao, Y., Y. Yuan, W. Shen, et al. 2019. The relationships between bilingual learning, willingness to study abroad and convergent creativity[J]. Peer J 7: e7776. |
| [22] | Zheng, Y., S. Denervaud & S. Durrleman. 2023. Bilingualism and creativity across development: Evidence from divergent thinking and convergent thinking[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16: 1058803. |
| [23] | 范琳、 王震. 2017. 语篇阅读推理及语言学习者语篇推理能力的培养[J]. 当代外语研究 (6): 11-16,108. |
| [24] | 黄婷、 郑咏滟. 2022. 双外语学习是否阻碍第一外语发展?——来自句法复杂度的证据[J]. 现代外语 45(5): 697-709. |
| [25] | 厉建娟. 2018. 社会文化理论视阈下二语写作过程中“注意”的研究[J]. 当代外语研究 (1): 49-53,109. |
| [26] | 梁红卫. 2020. 出国留学对创新思维影响的调查分析[J]. 发展研究 (10): 83-87. |
| [27] | 林崇德、 胡卫平. 2012. 创造性人才的成长规律和培养模式[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) (1): 36-42. |
| [28] | 沈汪兵、 袁媛. 2015. 创造性思维的社会文化基础[J]. 心理科学进展 23(7): 1169-1180. |
| [29] | 文秋芳、 王海妹、 王建卿、 等. 2010. 我国英语专业与其他文科类大学生思辨能力的对比研究[J]. 外语教学与研究 42(5): 350-355,400. |
| [30] | 郗佼. 2020. 社会文化理论与二语习得研究——理论、方法与实践[J]. 外语界 (2): 90-96. |
| [31] | 杨毅隆、 李亚丹. 2019. 二语水平对创造性思维的影响: 执行功能的调节作用[J]. 外语教学 40(5): 44-50. |
| [32] | 余伟、 郑钢. 2005. 跨文化心理学中的文化适应研究[J]. 心理科学进展 (6): 134-144. |
| [33] | 赵鼎新. 2021. 什么是社会学[M]. 北京: 三联书店. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |