网络出版日期: 2026-01-28
基金资助
*2024年度广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目“英语教师教育课程群虚拟教研室”(粤教高函〔2024〕30号);粤东基础教育研究课题“教学评一体化背景下初中英语育人观念的实施策略研究”(ydjy2024058)
Investigating the Correlation Between Teachers’ Teaching for Creativity and Foreign Language Teaching Enjoyment
教师的创造力教学能力及其教学愉悦情绪在提升外语教育质量中发挥着重要作用。然而,现有研究对两者的探讨仍显不足。本研究通过问卷调查法,以我国广东省699名中学英语教师为对象,考察了英语教师创造力教学和外语教学愉悦的现状,并探讨了两者之间的相关性。结果显示:(1)总体来看,我国中学英语教师的创造力教学能力与外语教学愉悦均处于较高水平;(2)两者之间存在较强的显著正相关;教师创造力教学能力的四个维度中,除了环境鼓励外,教师自我效能、社会价值与学生潜力能够显著预测外语教学愉悦。本研究的发现进一步丰富了外语教师情绪研究的视角,也为创造力教学研究提供了一定启示。
陈影 , 彭剑娥 , 刘毅 . 教师创造力教学与外语教学愉悦相关性研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2025 , 25(6) : 142 -149 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.06.016
Teachers’ Teaching for Creativity (TFC) and teaching enjoyment play a significant role in enhancing the quality of foreign language education. Nevertheless, prior research has paid little attention to these two aspects. This study explored the levels of English teachers’ TFC and Foreign Language Teaching Enjoyment (FLTE) and their correlation, using questionnaire based on data from 699 junior high school English teachers in Guangdong Province. The results of data analysis indicated that: (a) generally, English teachers’ TFC and FLTE were both at relatively high levels; (b) there was a strong significant positive correlation between English teachers’ TFC and their FLTE; among the four dimensions of TFC, teacher self-efficacy, societal value and student potential were significant predictors of FLTE but environmental encouragement was not. These findings can not only enrich the perspective of research on foreign language teachers’ emotions, but also provide some insights for the studies on TFC.
| [1] | Amabile, T. M., S. G. Barsade, J. S. Mueller, et al. 2005. Affect and creativity at work[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(3): 367-403. |
| [2] | Benesch, S. 2017. Emotions and English Language Teaching: Exploring Teachers’ Emotion Labor[M]. New York: Routledge. |
| [3] | Davis, M. A. 2009. Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108(1):25-38. |
| [4] | Dewaele, J.-M. & P. D. MacIntyre. 2016. Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of the language learner[A]. In P. D.MacIntyre, T.Gregersen & S.Mercer (eds.). Positive Psychology in SLA[C]. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 215-236. |
| [5] | Dobbins, K. 2009. Teacher creativity within the current education system: A case study of the perceptions of primary teachers[J]. Education3-13 37 (2): 95-104. |
| [6] | Eason, R., D. M. Giannangelo, L. A. Franceschini. 2009. A look at creativity in public and private schools[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity (4):130-137. |
| [7] | Frenzel, A. C., T. Goetz, O. Lüdtke, et al. 2009. Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(3):705-716. |
| [8] | Lee, H.-H. & T.-T. Yang. 2015. Employee goal orientation, work unit goal orientation and employee creativity[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management 24(4): 659-674. |
| [9] | Meihami, H. 2022. An exploratory investigation into EFL teacher educators’ approaches to develop EFL teachers’ ability to teach for creativity[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity 43:101006. |
| [10] | Mierzwa, E. 2019. Foreign language learning and teaching enjoyment: Teachers’ perspectives[J]. Journal of Education, Culture and Society 10(2): 170-188. |
| [11] | Oxford, R. L. & J. A. Burry-Stock. 1995. Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL)[J]. System 23(1): 1-23. |
| [12] | Proietti Ergün, A. L. & J. -M. Dewaele. 2021. Do well-being and resilience predict the foreign language teaching enjoyment of teachers of Italian?[J]. System 99: 102506. |
| [13] | Rubenstein, L. D., D. B. McCoach & D. Siegle. 2013. Teaching for creativity scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity[J]. Creativity Research Journal 25(3):324-334. |
| [14] | Yuan, F. & R. W. Woodman. 2010. Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations[J]. Academy of Management Journal 53(2):323-342. |
| [15] | 雷蕾. 2020. 应用语言学研究——设计与统计[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社. |
| [16] | 王振宏、 王克静、 游旭群, 等. 2010. 教师效能、工作动机与心境对教学创新的影响[J]. 心理科学 33(5):1254-1257. |
| [17] | 夏纪梅、 卢莉. 2003. 教案设计:外语教师创新能力的表现[J]. 外语界(1):54-59. |
| [18] | 中共中央国务院. 2018. 关于全面深化新时代教师队伍建设改革的意见[EB/OL].[2024-09-20]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-01/31/content_5262659.htm. |
| [19] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 2022. 义务教育英语课程标准(2022年版)[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
