网络出版日期: 2026-07-28
基金资助
*中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“基于人工智能技术的老年认知健康筛查研究”(编号22120260028);2026年度同济大学“医学+X”交叉研究项目“多模态融合语言康复数据库建设与应用研究”(编号2026-0648-YB-10)
Functional Communication and Language Interventions for Older Adults: Mechanisms, Implementation Framework, and Directions
老年语言干预正经历从“修复语言结构”到“促进功能性交际”的范式转移,其本质是将干预目标从“恢复被测试的语言能力”重新定义为“重建老年人参与生活的能力”。神经可塑性、认知储备、行为改变轮与交际理论协同支撑功能性交际干预从神经到行为、从个体到环境的全链条作用路径。功能性交际干预已发展出“核心层—工具层—场域层”多维实施框架:核心层激发人生经历等个体保护性因素,工具层综合多模态交际手段与语用能力训练,场域层嵌入日常话语活动并优化社交环境支持。在积极老龄观与大健康框架下,语言干预正转化为贯穿老年人全生命历程的健康投资,“语言康养”成为构筑老龄事业与社会福祉体系的重要阵地。其间,标准化与个性化、技术与人情、能力训练与环境改造三对核心张力的动态博弈,构成亟待破解的理论与实践命题。
姚权 , 黄立鹤 . 功能性交际与老年语言干预:机理、实施框架与展望[J]. 当代外语研究, 2026 , 26(3) : 148 -160 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2026.03.014
Language intervention for older adults is currently experiencing a paradigm shift from “structural linguistic repair” toward “functional communicative facilitation”. The essence of this shift lies in redefining its objective from the restoration of tested linguistic proficiency to the reconstruction of older adults’ capacities for participation in everyday life. Neuroplasticity, cognitive reserve, the Behavior Change Wheel, and communication theories jointly underpin the mechanistic pathway of functional communication interventions, spanning from neural mechanisms to behavioral outcomes, and from the individual to the environmental context. A multidimensional implementation framework of functional communication interventions is proposed, comprising the core, instrumental, and contextual layers. At the core layer, individual protective factors such as life experiences are activated; at the instrumental layer, multimodal communication resources and pragmatic ability training are employed; at the contextual layer, interventions are embedded in everyday discourse activities and social environmental support is improved. Guided by the principles of active aging and holistic health, language intervention is reconceptualized as a lifelong health investment, elevating “linguistic wellness and care” to a strategic domain within national aging initiatives and social welfare systems. The dialectical tensions between standardization and individualization, technology and humanity, and ability training and environmental modification constitute theoretical and practical problematics that remain to be resolved.
| [1] | Bambini V., E. Tonini, I. Ceccato, et al. 2020. How to improve social communication in aging: Pragmatic and cognitive interventions[J]. Brain and Language 211: 104864. |
| [2] | Davies K., T. Howe, J. Small, et al. 2025. “Staying connected”: Speech-language pathologists’ perspectives on the communication needs of people with primary progressive aphasia and their family members[J]. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 27 (3): 423-439. |
| [3] | Devanga S. R. 2025. Collaborative referencing intervention (CRI) in aphasia: A replication and extension of the phase II efficacy study[J]. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 34 (2): 739-765. |
| [4] | Dietz A., S. E. & K. Weissling. 2020. Revisiting the role of augmentative and alternative communication in aphasia rehabilitation[J]. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 29 (2): 909-913. |
| [5] | Hengst J. A., M. C. Duff. & T. A. Jones. 2019. Enriching communicative environments: Leveraging advances in neuroplasticity for improving outcomes in neurogenic communication disorders[J]. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology 28 (1S): 216-229. |
| [6] | Kiran S. & C. K. Thompson. 2019. Neuroplasticity of language networks in aphasia: Advances, updates, and future challenges[J]. Frontiers in Neurology 10: 295. |
| [7] | Marcotti A., S. Rivera C. Silva-Letelier, et al. 2024. Effectiveness of the active communication education program in improving the general quality of life of older adults who use hearing aids: A randomized clinical trial[J]. BMC Geriatrics 24: 828. |
| [8] | Michie S., M. M. van Stralen & R. West. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions[J]. Implementation Science 6: 42. |
| [9] | Parola A., F. M. Bosco I. Gabbatore, et al. 2019. The impact of the cognitive pragmatic treatment on the pragmatic and informative skills of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI)[J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics 51: 53-62. |
| [10] | Rogalski E., M. Bona, M. Esparza, et al. 2025. Efficacy of communication bridge-2 for primary progressive aphasia: A randomized controlled trial of communication intervention[J]. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 21 (3): e70088. |
| [11] | Stern Y., E. M. Arenaza-Urquijo D. Bartres-Faz, et al. 2020. Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance[J]. Alzheimers & Dementia 16 (9): 1305-1311. |
| [12] | Tessier A., C. Croteau G. Le Dorze, et al. 2023. Exploring the effects of a communication partner training programme for adapted transport drivers[J]. Aphasiology 37 (2): 179-204. |
| [13] | Wachsmuth I., M. Knoblich. & G. Knoblich. 2008. Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [14] | Zhao J. W. Cai. J. Su, et al. 2023. The effect of creative expression program in neurocognitive networks performance measured by task and resting-state functional MRI[J]. International Psychogeriatrics 35 (8): 411-420. |
| [15] | 陈佳璇、 胡范铸. 2026. 算力、脑力、情感力:文明史视域下新质生产力的重新认识——兼论对文旅发展的启示[J]. 文化艺术研究(1): 20-31,112-113. |
| [16] | 高一虹、 白露、 秦苑. 2023. 大查房、生命回顾仪式——安宁疗护新语类探索[J]. 现代外语 46(2): 174-186. |
| [17] | 戈兆一、 李宇明. 2026. 中国语言康复业发展现状及路径选择[J]. 语言战略研究 11(1): 29-41. |
| [18] | 顾曰国. 2024a. 论老年人语言能力评估在我国语言能力评估体系中的定位[J]. 语言学研究(1): 6-19. |
| [19] | 顾曰国. 2024b. 论老年语言能力与评估[J]. 当代语言学 26(1): 1-24. |
| [20] | 黄立鹤、 马忠全. 2025. 复杂动态系统理论视角下的全龄周期语言发展问题[J]. 外语学刊(6): 30-39. |
| [21] | 黄立鹤. 2025. 阿马蒂亚·森可行能力理论视域下的老年人语言能力问题[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版) 36(4): 122-132. |
| [22] | 刘红艳. 2024. 活在当下——阿尔茨海默症老年人当下亲历语言能力多模态研究[J]. 外语电化教学(3): 40-47, 114. |
| [23] | 姚权、 黄立鹤. 2026. 谁被记住,为谁记住:文化记忆机构老年记忆服务的可能与路径[J]. 文化艺术研究(1): 44-54,113-114. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |