网络出版日期: 2026-07-28
基金资助
*国家社科基金重大项目“21世纪英语文学纪事与研究”(编号23&ZD304);国家社科基金一般项目“加拿大左翼文学批评史研究”(编号18BWW057)
From Natural Devastation to Spiritual Redemption: Ecological Anti-War Narrative Study of Findley’s The Wars
“生态反战叙事”指向一种将战争批判与生态关怀深度融合的文学实践,其核心特征为:聚焦自然整体的创伤,而非仅关注人类的伤亡,追问人类与自然关系的伦理基础,而非单纯批判战争的正义性,呼唤人与非人生命的共生,而非片面追求和平本身。蒂莫西·芬德利的小说《战争》(1977)清晰展现了这一叙事类型的生成机制与伦理意涵。研究发现,小说通过 “破—立—升” 的三重结构完成生态反战叙事的建构。首先展现战争如何将自然从“生命之地”异化为“暴力空间”;其次借助绿洲意象与动物声音的书写,把自然建构为创伤修复与精神庇护的象征场域;最后阐释个体生命能在灵魂与自然的共生之中超越死亡、获得伦理意义上的不朽,进而呼吁人与非人生命之间的共生联结。《战争》的生态书写揭示了帝国主义战争不仅是针对“他者”的征服,更是对自然以及非人生命的全面掠夺与摧毁。正是通过“生态反战叙事”这一视角,我们得以洞悉帝国主义战争的这一深层本质,而人类唯有重建人与自然的共生关系,方能在文明废墟之上重新确立伦理根基。
朱佳 , 魏莉 . 从自然毁灭到精神救赎:芬德利《战争》中的生态反战叙事研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2026 , 26(3) : 221 -230 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2026.03.021
The term “ecological anti-war narrative” designates a literary practice that combines a war criticism with ecological consciousness. Its defining features are the foregrounding of the trauma inflicted upon the natural world as a whole rather than a sole focus on human casualties, interrogating the ethical foundations of the human-nature relationship rather than merely debating the justice of wars, and envisioning a mode of coexistence between human and nonhuman life rather than advocating peace in purely anthropocentric terms.Timothy Findley’s novel The Wars (1977) embodies the generative mechanism and ethical implications of this narrative mode. This novel constructs an ecological anti-war narrative through a threefold structure of “destruction, construction, and transcendence”. First, it depicts how war alienates nature from a “land of life” into a “space of violence”. Second, through the writing of oasis imagery and animal voices, the novel reconfigures nature as a symbolic site of trauma repair and spiritual refuge. Finally, it shows that in the symbiosis of the soul and nature, individual life transcends death and achieves immortality in an ethical sense, thereby calling for coexistence between human and nonhuman life. The ecological writing of The Wars reveals that imperial warfare entails not only the conquest of the “other”, but also the systematic domination of nature and nonhuman life. It is precisely through the lens of “ecological anti-war narrative” that this deeper nature of imperialist warfare becomes visible. Only by reconstructing a symbiotic relationship between humanity and the natural world can ethical foundations be reestablished amid the ruins of civilization.
| [1] | Belluc S., I. Brasme & G. Tanguy. 2025. The Ecopoetics of War[M]. New York: Routledge. |
| [2] | Brooks, P. 1989. The House of Life: Rachel Carson at Work[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. |
| [3] | Buell L. 1995. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
| [4] | Findley T. 1977. The Wars[M]. Toronto: Penguin Books. |
| [5] | Klovan, P. 2021. “Bright and Good”: Findley’s The Wars[J]. Canadian Literature:A Quarterly of Criticism and Review 91: 58-69. |
| [6] | McKenzie S. M. L. 1986. Memories of the Great War: Graves, Sassoon, and Findley[J]. University of Toronto Quarterly 55 (4): 395-411. |
| [7] | N?ss A. 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary[J]. Inquiry (16): 95-100. |
| [8] | Plumwood V. 2003. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature[M]. London: Routledge. |
| [9] | Russell E. 2001. War and Nature[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [10] | 马克思、 恩格斯. 2009. 马克思恩格斯文集(第9卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社. |
| [11] | 玛格丽特·阿特伍德. 2003. 生存:加拿大文学主题指南(赵庆庆译)[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社. |
| [12] | 诺思洛普·弗莱. 1998. 伟大的代码:圣经与文学(郝振益等 译)[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社. |
| [13] | 涂慧. 2022. 从他者凝视到主体建构——加拿大英语文学动物书写在当代欧美的接受阐释[J]. 外国文学研究 (4):164-176. |
| [14] | 王宁. 2020. 当代生态批评的“动物转向”[J]. 外国文学研究 42(1):34-41. |
| [15] | 王桃花、 林武凯. 2022. 空间视域下帕特·巴克《重生》中的战争创伤言说机制[J]. 复旦外国语言文学论丛 (2):94-100. |
| [16] | 张洁颖. 2022. 从生态视阈解读《赛比利亚》中的战争书写[J]. 当代外国文学 (2):151-157. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |