On the Cultivation Planning of New Foreign Language Professionals Serving the Construction of Foreign-Related Rule of Law: Standards, Directions and Systems

  • YU Suqing ,
  • LUO Weilan
Expand

Online published: 2024-11-27

Abstract

New foreign language professionals as an important component of the foreign-related rule of law, function as a bridge between the domestic rule of law and international governance, and play a vital role in the modernization of the rule of law with Chinese characteristics. The current problems of the cultivation of new foreign language professionals can be attributed to a vague standard of what shall be done and how it is done in their training. The vision of foreign language teaching is still bogged in out-dated notions. The relevant theories of Foreign Language Education Planning might hint on clues as to the core questions of “who, what, and how”in designing new foreign language programs. A new foreign language professional is one with personality integrity and a creative mind, well trained in law and legal English or otherwise, and able to share the Chinese stories of the rule of law in international occasions. Hence, a systematic and comprehensive planning approach, taking into account such factors as the strategic positioning, investigation and research, report summarization, policy formulation, policy implementation, and planning assessment, is required for designing the cultivation program of new foreign language professionals in the direction of “integrating ideology and politics, jurisprudence, and intelligence” to serve the construction of the foreign-related rule of law.

Cite this article

YU Suqing , LUO Weilan . On the Cultivation Planning of New Foreign Language Professionals Serving the Construction of Foreign-Related Rule of Law: Standards, Directions and Systems[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024 , 24(5) : 69 -79 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.05.007

References

[1] Baldauf R. B., M. Li & S. Zhao. 2008. Language acquisition management inside and outside the school [A]. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (eds.). The Handbook of Educational Linguistics [C]. New York: Springer. 233-250.
[2] Cooper R. L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Kaplan R. B. & R. B. Baldauf. 1997. Language Planning: From Practice to Theory[M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
[4] 程京艳. 2020. 外语教育政策评估体系构建研究[J]. 外语学刊(3):99-105.
[5] 邓世平、 王雪梅. 2020. 探索新文科背景下外语人才培养新路径——新文科背景下的“多语种+”卓越国际化人才培养论坛述评[J]. 山东外语教学 41(2):133-135.
[6] 何宁、 王守仁. 2021. 新文科、新外语、新导向——论外语专业人才培养的发展与创新[J]. 外语教育研究前沿 4(4):3-8,91.
[7] 何宁、 王守仁. 2022. 新时代高校外语专业的人才培养[J]. 外语教学理论与实践(3):13-18.
[8] 何勤华. 2013. 推进协同创新,提高法学人才培养质量的几点思考[J]. 法学教育研究 8(1):20-27,457.
[9] 黄惠康. 2020. 从战略高度推进高素质涉外法律人才队伍建设[J]. 国际法研究(3):10-18.
[10] 黄惠康. 2022. 准确把握“涉外法治”概念内涵统筹推进国内法治和涉外法治[J]. 武大国际法评论 6(1):1-20.
[11] 黄进. 2022. 论统筹推进国内法治和涉外法治[J]. 中国社会科学(12):84-95,200-201.
[12] 莫纪宏、 徐梓文. 2022. 为涉外法治提供坚实立法保障[N]. 光明日报(4-1):11.
[13] 任萍. 2022. 新文科语境下复合型外语人才培养研究[J]. 浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版) 21(1):87-92.
[14] 芮国星. 2022. 论新时代中国高等教育的现代化发展[J]. 延安大学学报(社会科学版) 44():110-117,129.
[15] 沈骑. 2017. 中国外语教育规划:方向与议程[J]. 中国外语 14(5):11-20.
[16] 王祥修, 赵永鹏. 2021. “一带一路”倡议下中国涉外法治人才培养目标及方案[J]. 法学教育研究 34(3):18-36.
[17] 文旭、 文卫平、 胡强、 等. 2020. 外语教育的新理念与新路径[J]. 外语教学与研究 52(1):17-24.
[18] 徐显明. 2022. 新文科与新法学[J]. 新文科理论与实践(1):20-23,123.
[19] 余素青、 骆伟兰. 2023. 当代中国法治话语规划研究[J]. 外国语文 39(2):27-36.
[20] 张法连. 2021. 加快涉外法治人才培养体系建设[N]. 人民日报(3-25):19.
Outlines

/