Fig. 2a shows the schematic of experimental setup, containing three parts: photon-pair source, classical–quantum link and wavelength-selective switch (WSS), and polarization analysis module. In the source part, a single-mode fiber-coupled continuous-wave (CW) laser centered at 780.08-nm pumps the semiconductor BRW source. 1% power of the laser is split to the optical spectrum analyzer for wavelength calibration and a fiber polarization controller is used to adjust the pump polarization before injection into the source. The source consists of a core layer sandwiched by six periods upper and lower Bragg layers and has a length of 4 mm. Broadband polarization–entangled photon pairs can be directly generated by degenerate type-II spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) due to the low material birefringence (see Supplementary Materials 1 for detailed description). The lack of emitted time information of photons in the SPDC process leads to energy–time entanglement
54. Light is coupled into and out from the chip by lens-tapered fibers mounted on high-precision servo motors. The total insertion loss of the chip is about 11 dB, including both input–output coupling loss and propagation loss in the chip for the TIR modes. To stabilize the pump transmission, we use the rejected pump light filtered by a 980/1550 dense wavelength division multiplexer (DWDM) as a feedback signal for the motor and adopt hill-climbing algorithm to optimize the coupling under unstable laboratory conditions. Due to energy conservation during the SPDC process, the polarization-entangled photons exhibit anti-correlation in frequency. The correlated photons and an external noise source are then multiplexed into the same fiber link via DWDM. In the experiment, noise is introduced by co-transmitting a 1591.26-nm classical laser with quantum signals through a 3-km-long fiber, representing a realistic scenario for a quantum communication system operating on public DWDM networks. The coexistence of classical and quantum signals in the same fiber can lead to some problems that may affect the performance of quantum communication. The dominant sources of noise are crosstalk from the classical light when the used DWDM has insufficient isolation and Raman scattering, which occurs due to the inelastic photon-phonon interaction
55,56. In this experiment, the wavelength of classical light is far away from that of quantum signals; therefore, the crosstalk of the non-adjacent channels can be eliminated by the use of appropriate filters on the quantum receivers. However, the broadband Raman noise cannot be spectrally filtered out as it is in-band with the quantum signals. In order to obtain the Raman cross section for different signal and idler channels, the measurement results are obtained using a laser centered at 1591.26 nm in a single-mode fiber (see Supplementary Materials 3). By using a WSS, six wavelength grids of the signal (ranging from 1554.1 nm to 1557.1 nm) and idler (ranging from 1563.4 nm to 1566.4 nm) spectra were postselected. Each selected grid has a full-width half maximum bandwidth of 0.4 nm and wavelength interval of 0.6 nm. The polarization analysis module, along with each channel, comprises a quarter-wave plate, a half-wave plate, a UPMI, and a SPD. In the interferometer, two orthogonal polarizations are connected to polarization-maintaining fibers of different lengths, converting them into arrival time information for the photons. The number of coincidence counts in four configurations are consequently obtained in one data accumulation. The single-photon detection events are recorded using a field-programmable-gate-array-based timetag unit. From these timetag records, both single counts and coincidence counts are extracted. The
d-dimensional Hilbert space is split into
d/2 mutually exclusive polarization subspaces.
Fig. 2b shows the 6 × 6 joint spectrum intensity for four different classical laser powers in the
Z = {
H,
V} and
X = {
A,
D} bases with an integration time of 120 s. An input pump power of 30 mW and a coincidence window of 0.5 ns were set. As expected, increasing the power of the classical laser results in a higher number of noise photons, which randomly spread the whole selected spectral range, while the correlated signals distributed in the diagonal elements remain almost constant. From the project measurements on the two mutually unbiased bases, a lower bound on the fidelity to the Bell state can be estimated
44.
Fig. 2b shows the averaged lower-bound fidelity of the six frequency subspaces shown diagonally. The decrease in the fidelity can provide an intuitive explanation for the state becoming more mixed in more noisy channels (see Supplementary Materials 3 for a detailed theoretical analysis).
Fig. 2c shows the averaged quantum bit error rates (QBERs) in Z and X bases of various division numbers for different classical powers. The QBER is determined by using the raw coincidence counts in each basis: QBER
z = (
CHH+
CVV)/(
CHH+
CHV+
CVH+
CVV) and QBER
x = (
CDA+
CAD)/(
CDA+
CDD+
CAD+
CAA). To study the effects of coarse-grained frequency division, the 6 × 6 matrix is summed to reconstruct 1 × 1, 2 × 2, and 3 × 3 matrices for the estimation of QBERs. The results show that as the number of mutually exclusive subspaces increases, QBERs decrease dramatically, especially over highly noisy quantum channels, indicating stronger noise resilience for larger
N in QNs.
Fig. 2d shows the lower-bound concurrence calculated by
$C \geq V_{\mathrm{D} / \mathrm{A}}+V_{\mathrm{H} / \mathrm{V}}-1$ 57 as a function of division number with four classical light powers. All the experimental results are in good agreement with theoretical predictions (colored solid lines) calculated through the analysis in Supplementary Materials 3. The increased degree of entanglement for large
N implies nonlocality distillation, which also has the potential application to improve the noise resistance in device-independent QKD
58.