INTRODUCTION
Table 1. Comparison between vdW material-based FG transistors and traditional FG transistors. |
| Empty Cell | Material | Endurance (cycles) | Retention time | Operation voltage Vset/Vrset | Energy consumption per spikes | STP/STD/LTP/LTDa | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VdW material-based FG transistors | MoS2/h-BN/Gr | ∼105 | - | −4 V/+3 V | ∼5 fJ | STP/LTP | 69 |
| MoS2/h-BN/Gr | >105 | >104 s | ±10 V ∼ ±13 V | ∼18 fJ | LTP/LTD | 70 | |
| MoS2/h-BN/Gr | >103 | >103 s | +10 V/−8 V | ∼28 pJ | STP/LTP | 71 | |
| BP/Al2O3/BP | - | - | ±5 V | sub-fJ | LTP | 72 | |
| Empty Cell | HfS2/h-BN/Gr | >103 | >104 s | −20 V/+15 V | 0.2 pJ | STP/LTP/LTD | 73 |
| Traditional FG transistors | ZnO/Al2O3/ZnO | 10000 | 30000 s | +18 V/−15 V | - | - | 74 |
| Empty Cell | silicon/oxygen/metal | - | - | +10 V/−7 V | - | STP/LTP/LTD | 64 |
| Empty Cell | IGZOb/SiO2/Au-NCSc | 1050 | - | ±35 V | - | - | 75 |
| Empty Cell | silicon/oxygen/nitrogen | - | - | −11 V /+10 V | - | - | 76 |
ashort-term potentiation/short-term depression/long-term potentiation/long-term depression bindium-gallium-zinc-oxide cAu-nanocrystals |
Fig. 1. History of the development of FG device. |
WORKING PRINCIPLES OF FG DEVICE
TYPICAL STRUCTURES OF FG DEVICE
Fig. 2. Typical structures of FG device. a, Back (left)/Top (right) gate structure. b, Dual-gate structure. c, Semi-floating gate (SFG) structure. d, Two-terminal FG structure. e, Extended FG structure. |
MEMRISTORS BASED ON FG
Fig. 3. Extended floating gate device and electrical characteristic. a, Optical micrograph (left) and schematic diagram of the device (right). b, Representative image of the gate capacitance circuit. C1 represents the capacitance between FG and Si++ (SiO2 dielectric), and C2 represents the capacitance between FG and channel (h-BN). The extended FG is made by connecting the graphene layer to the metal plate. c, Subthreshold slopes for devices with different FG configurations. D1, D2, and D3 are devices with extended FG, D9 has no extended FG, D10 is without FG. d, Transfer curve with various Vsd. e, Changes in channel conductance of multiple potentiation and depression pulses for device structures with and without extended FG, respectively. The potentiation pulse numbers are 1 to 12 and 25 to 36, and the depression pulse numbers are 13 to 24 and 37 to 48. Reprinted with permission from ref.69. © 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd. |
Fig. 4. Ultrahigh-speed non-volatile memory device with the atomically sharp interface and electrical characteristics. a, Schematic diagram of the device structure and working principle of the FG memory device (left). False-color optical image shows a memory device with heterostructure of InSe/h-BN/MLG placed on a SiO2/Si substrate (right). b, Large-scale HAADF-STEM image of the device. c, Typical dual-sweeping transfer curve of the device. Vds is 0.05 V. The red and blue curves correspond to the maximum Vcg of 25 V and 40 V respectively, and the arrow direction identifies the scanning direction. d, The memory cell was successfully programmed/erased by positive/negative voltage pulses of nanosecond pulse width with amplitudes of +20.2/−20.8 V, and the extinction ratio of 1010. e, An example of two-bit storage through the combination of ultra-fast pulse sequences. Among them, the voltage amplitude, and FWHM of programming and erasing pulses are (+20.2 V, 21 ns) and (−20.8 V, 21 ns) respectively. The thickness of the h-BN layer is 12 nm. Reprinted with permission from ref.151. © 2021 Nature Publishing Group. |
Fig. 5. A SFG memory and electrical characteristic. a, Schematic diagram of SFG memory. Where, WSe2, h-BN, and HfS2 are used as a channel, blocking layer, and FG, respectively. A PN junction is formed between MoS2 and WSe2. b, SFG memory write-1 at ultrahigh speed with 15 ns writing pulse. Operation process: write-read. The reading voltage VDS = 0.5 V. Performance before (c) and after (d) 100 write-erase cycles. e, The relationship between the output current and the write pulse width at different waiting times after the write operation. f, Representation of the quasi-non-volatile characteristics. Reprinted with permission from ref.152. © 2018 Nature Publishing Group. |
Fig. 6. Optical and electrical modulation-based FG memristors. a, Schematic diagram of the structure and working mechanism of the optical memory device with the structure of MoS2/cPVP/AuNPs. b, Optically-controlled multi-level data storage characteristics of optoelectronic memory devices applied by bias voltage. c, Retention time and d, cycle tests for MoS2 optoelectronic memory devices under photoillumination at various illumination powers. e, Schematic structure of an optical memory device based on MoS2/h-BN/graphene heterostructure with FG FETs. f, Curves of IDS with time for different pulsed light powers. Where, the exposure time texp = 1 s, VDS-read = 0.5 V, and time-dependent IDS was recorded for 20 s for each pulse power. g, The retention performance of the on-current (red, erased by a 458 nm laser pulse with a power of 200 nW for 1 s) and off-current (black, programmed by VDS-pro = -12 V for 2 s). Where, VDS-read = 0.1 V, and the thickness of h-BN is 9 nm. h, The time curve of IDS under light pulse stimuli shows the multilevel storage. Where, P = 160 nW, texp = 0.1 s, λ = 458 nm. Reprinted with permission from refs.161,162. © 2016, 2018 Wiley-Blackwell. |
Fig. 7. Mechanical modulation-based FG memristors. a, Schematic structure of a tribotronic nonvolatile memory based on graphene/h-BN/MoS2 heterojunction combined with TENG structure. b, Endurance test with 100 cycles regulated by TENG displacement. Among the contents of the cycles: programming at a relative distance of −0.2 mm for 3 s (blue area), erasing at a relative distance of +0.2 mm for 3 s (orange area), and the reading voltage VDS = 50 mV for 1 s. c, Retention performance of the memory after applying the reverse mechanical displacement, where VDS = 50 mV. d, The time of IDS with the increasing distance between two friction layers. The separated states show the potential of multi-level data storage in memory, where the fixed step distance is 0.05 mm. e, The time curve of IDS at different interval distances from 0.01 mm to 0.25 mm. Reprinted with permission from ref.169. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. |
Fig. 8. Mechanical modulated FG memristor based on dual mode input. a, Mechanical modulated non-volatile memory. Coexisting of optical and mechanical input realize the multilevel storage function together. b, Energy band diagram of the working principle of device programming and erasing processes. c, Retention time of the memory device after different TENG displacement operations, where VD = 1 V. d, Program/erase cycle test of the memory device after various laser pulse illumination. e, Device photoresponsivity versus mechanical displacement (corresponding to different gate voltages) at different optical powers, where VD = 1 V. h, The different states of the drain current when the voltage pulse (f) generated by the mechanical displacement and the optical pulse (g)is applied to the memory device, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref.170. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. |
APPLICATIONS FOR NEUOMORPHIC COMPUTING
Fig. 9. All vdW integration-type optoelectronic synapses for multi-target recognition. a, Schematic illustrations of biological visual attention mechanism in multi-object recognition tasks. Saliency-based attention (blue path): The visual cortex forms feature maps through perceptual memory processes, and the human visual system identifies the most salient target. For instance, the dark “8” is more likely to be recognized in the figure than “2” and “6”. Focus attention mechanism (orange path): the prefrontal cortex is involved in attentional control, regulating the representational salience of external stimuli by focusing attentional signals to identify non-salient objects. According to the priority determined by the focus attention mechanism, the non-salient “6” or “2” can be recognized. b, Left: schematic diagram of an integration-type biological synapse. Visual and attentional signals can be integrated to identify postsynaptic signals. Right: schematic diagram of artificial synapse with integrated functionality based on ReS2/h-BN/monolayer graphene structure. c, LTP/LTD behavior of the integration-type synapse. 20 continuous light spikes (0.11 nW µm−2, 100 ms, interval 100 ms) were applied to trigger the LTP behavior, and 20 consecutive positive gate voltage pulses (from 0.05 to 9.55 V with 0.5 V step at Δt = 200 ms) were applied afterward to trigger the LTD behavior. d, Recognition probability distribution of 100 random feature maps under attention fluctuation conditions. Each unit in the “2” area of the synaptic array was set to the same normalized conductance value of 0.8 during the steady attention state. Three Sine function gate voltage pulses (amplitude 0.1 V, period 2 s) and five Sine function gate voltage pulses (amplitude 0.2 V, period 2 s) are applied to simulate the periodic fluctuation of attention. The resulting volatility normalized conductivity (from 0.75 to 0.85) is then randomly assigned to the “2” area, allowing 100 feature diagrams to be formed, and the recognition probability is obtained by inputting the feature maps into NVS. e, Illustration of a NVS for the multi-target recognition task, with a visual attention mechanism based on an optoelectronic synapse array. The synaptic array captures three targets (distinguished by different light doses) and converts light doses into corresponding conductance. In the output feature map, by mapping conductance to grayscale, the most salient target is input into ANN for recognition. In particular, the selective recognition of the target is controlled by the voltage. f, Schematic diagram of the process that identifies three targets with varied saliencies in turn, relying on saliency-based and focus attention mechanisms. g, Recognition possibilities for three targets (“8”, “2”, and “6”) about attention modulation number. Reprinted with permission from ref.177. © 2022 Wiley-VCH Verlag. |
Fig. 10. MoS2 FG-FET for neuromorphic speech recognition. a, A block diagram comparing the proposed NSRS with its biological counterpart. The functions of the basilar membrane (BM) and inner hair cells (IHC) are simulated by the cochlear processing unit, which is in control of filtering frequency information from the audio sample and transmitting it non-linearly, and finally outputting spectrogram of digits 0 to 9. Spiral ganglion cells (SGC) were modeled as Poisson neurons, and features were extracted through STDP layers to output neurons, whose postsynaptic potentials were used to perform speech recognition tasks on TIDIGITS isolated digits. b, Typical shape of bio-realistic spikes used in the STDP layers. c, Schematic diagram of the MoS2 FG-FET used for STDP learning. d, Confusion matrix for a speech recognition task of 3260 spoken digits performed on the TIDIGITS dataset. The x-axis represents the audio's actual class/digit, while the y-axis represents the class/digit predicted by the classifier for the provided audio. Therefore, the higher the value on the diagonal in the confusion matrix, the more accurate the prediction. Reprinted with permission from ref.178. © 2014, IOP Publishing Ltd. |
Fig. 11. Intelligent tactile recognition system. a, Cross-section TEM image (left) and top-surface SEM image (right) of MoS2 synaptic transistor. Among them, MoS2 is the channel layer and AuNPs is the FG layer. The transistor has five channel lengths, L = 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 µm, with one source electrode (S) corresponding to five drain electrodes (D1, D2, D3, D4, D5). b, SEM image of PDMS film (top) and structure of PDMS pressure sensor (bottom). The PDMS film has unique pyramid micro-structures, which are covered with a Cr/Au (5/40 nm) layer as a top electrode (TE). The ITO on the PET film is used as a bottom electrode (BE). c,The diagram of the integration of MoS2 synaptic transistor and PDMS pressure sensor, wherein the drain electrodes D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5 are connected with the pressure sensors S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5, respectively. d, Illustration of spatial position recognition. The pressure sensors S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 are distributed in the east, south, west, north, and center directions, respectively. e, Results of the spatial position recognition. The response current changes with time as each of the pressure sensors S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 is pressed. f, Spatiotemporal modulation of synaptic plasticity is controlled by touching different pressure sensors. g, Diagram of spatiotemporal modulation of synaptic plasticity (top), and learning and forgetting activities (bottom). The difficulty degrees of learning activities are represented by different pressure sensors, S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 represent very easy, easy, normal, difficult, and very difficult, respectively. h, Simulation of various learning and forgetting abilities controlled by touching. The required number of Vgs pulses for S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 to obtain the same ∆W increment are 10, 20, 40, 50, and 70, respectively. However, it is noteworthy that the ∆W decays to 39%, 25%, 19%, 9%, and −12% for S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 after removing the Vgs pulses for 100 s. Reprinted with permission from refs.165,179. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. © 2023 Wiley-VCH Verlag. |

