INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1. a, Schematic illustration of the transfer characteristics of a field-effect transistor (FET) at ambient and cryogenic temperatures. b, A typical architecture in a dilution fridge for quantum computing. |
Fig. 2. Application of cryoelectronics. |
Carbon-based nanomaterials
Graphene
Fig. 3. Electronic structure of graphene (a) and carbon nanotubes (b). Reprinted with permission from ref.50. © 2015 American Physical Society. |
Carbon nanotubes
Table 1. Comparison of electronical parameters of Si-based and carbon-based materials. |
| Empty Cell | Si | CNT49,50 | Graphene46,49 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility (cm2 V−1 s−1) | 1600 (electron) 500 (hole) | 106 | 106 |
| Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1) | 230 | 3500 | 5000 |
| Band gap (eV) | 1.12 | 0-2 | 0 |
| Current density (A cm−2) | 120 | 109 | 108 |
| Saturation velocity (cm s−1) | 107 | 4 × 107 | 4 × 107 |
TRANSISTORS
CNT-FETs
Fig. 4. Carbon nanotube-based FET at cryogenic temperatures. a, Temperature-dependent ON- and OFF-state currents. The inset is a schematic diagram of the CNT FET device with a self-aligned top gate structure. b, Transfer characteristics of the CNT FET measured at 300 K and 4.3 K88. c, Photo of the CNT FET embedded in RF pads. d, fT versus gate voltage Vgs at several temperatures90. e, Schematic energy band diagram for the CNT FET at different bias voltages. f, Schematic diagram of the CNT film-based FET device with a self-aligned top gate structure. g, SEM image of CNT five-stage ring oscillators (ROs) based on the self-aligned FET. h, Comparison of temperature stability between different devices. i, The relative temperature coefficient of the oscillation frequency (f0) in five-stage ROs101. Reprinted with permission from refs.88,90,101. © 2011, 2012, 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH. |
Graphene-FETs
Fig. 5. Graphene-based FET at cryogenic temperatures. a, Temperature-dependent transfer characteristics of a graphene-FET. The inset is the measured electron and hole mobilities as a function of temperature at a carrier density. b, Measurement of the Pd-graphene contact resistance as a function of temperature at different gate voltage values. c, Calculated transmission efficiency TMG, determined using Matthiessen's rule, as a function of the ratio of the mean free path (λ) and metal-graphene coupling length (λm). The inset is the Pd-graphene contact, showing the transfer length LT. Reprinted with permission from ref.108. © 2011 Nature Publishing Group. d, Temperature dependence of the carrier mobility in the graphene FET fabricated on NFC polymer substrates. Reprinted with permission from ref.110. © 2009 American Chemical Society. e, Schematic diagram of a top-gated graphene r.f. transistor on the DLC substrate. f, Cross-sectional TEM image of a graphene transistor with a gate length of 40 nm. g, Current gain as a function of frequency for three channel lengths at 4.3 K. The values of fT are 28 GHz, 70 GHz and 140 GHz. h, Summary plot of the temperature dependence of fT for three different devices; little temperature dependence was found. Reprinted with permission from ref.115. © 2011 Nature Publishing Group. |
Table 2. Comparison of electronical metrics of Si-based and carbon-based devices at cryogenic temperature. |
| Empty Cell | Si-based34,40,116 | CNT-based88,90,101 | Graphene-based115 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility (cm2 V−1 s−1) | 200-300 (5 K)a | 5500 (4.3 K)d | 4000 (6 K) |
| SS (mV dev−1) | 20 (5 K)a | 30 (4.3 K)d | |
| fT (GHz) | 494/337 (n/p 5.5 K)b | 9 (77 K) 8 (10 K)e | 155 (4.3 K) |
| fmax (GHz) | 497/372 (n/p 5.5 K)b | 9 (77 K) 8 (10 K)e | |
| gm/gds | 20.1/12.4 (n/p 70 K) 19.3/12.4 (n/p 5.5 K)b | 9 (77 K) 2.3 (10 K)e | |
| τP (ps) | 10 (4.3 K 101-stage)c | 90 (80 K 5-stage)e | |
| fO shift | ∼7% (300-40 K)c | ∼0.5% (300-80 K)e |
fmax: power gain cut-off frequency; τP: stage delay; fO shift: temperature dependence of oscillation frequency. a: 14 nm FinFET; b: 22 nm FDSOI; c: 28 nm FDSOI; d: single CNT; e: network-CNT film; |
QUANTUM DOT DEVICES
SET imaging
Fig. 6. CNT-based SET for noninvasive imaging. a, Mechanism of the SET detector. Reprinted with permission from ref.123. © 2013 Nature Publishing Group. b, Charge sensitivity of a CNT-based RF-SET at 4.2 K. Reprinted with permission from ref.122. © 2008 AIP Publishing. c, Schematic diagram of a nanoassembly technique for creating clean and complex CNT-based devices127. d, Schematic diagram of a visualization probe based on CNTs. e, Imaging ballistic and hydrodynamic electron flow profiles54. f, Hydrodynamic electrons flowing in a Corbino disk without Landauer-Sharvin resistance55. g, Imaged current streamlines (black isocontours) superimposed on the zero-field voltage contours (color)133. Reprinted with permission from refs.54,55,127,133. © 2013, 2019, 2022 Nature Publishing Group. |
Electromagnetic field sensors
Fig. 7. CNT-based qubit for ultrasensitive electromagnetic sensing. a, Charge stability diagram. The coherence-limited transition of qubits between |B>, |D> and |N> is used for electromagnetic sensing. b, Comparing SET and qubit performance in sensing DC electric potential and DC magnetic field. Reprinted with permission from ref.134. © 2020 Nature Publishing Group. |
TEMPERATURE SENSORS
Fig. 8. Graphene-based noise thermometry. a, The measurement circuit of a two-terminal microwave-frequency noise thermometry. Reprinted with permission from ref.145. © 2012 American Physical Society. b, Circuit and geometry for four-terminal nonlocal noise thermometry152. Reprinted with permission from ref.152. © 2021 Nature Publishing Group. |
NANOMECHANICS
Fig. 9. Carbon-based nanomechanical devices. a, Left: Schematic and SEM image of parametric amplification based on a suspended CNT. Right: Resonance frequency and gain as a function of the amplitude of the gate voltage. Reprinted with permission from ref.160. © 2011 American Chemical Society. b, Left: Schematic and SEM image of a nanomechanical mass sensor based on a suspended CNT (diameter 1.7 nm; suspended length 150 nm). Right: Measuring mass resolution at 5.5 K. The red dashed line corresponds to the mass of one hydrogen atom. Reprinted with permission from ref.177. © 2012 Nature Publishing Group. c, SEM image of large-scale arrays of graphene-based resonators. Reprinted with permission from ref.172. © 2010 American Chemical Society. d, SEM image and schematic of coherent phonon dynamics between three graphene-based resonators. Reprinted with permission from ref.187. © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. |
Table 3. Comparison of quality factor and force sensitivity of various force sensors at cryogenic temperature. |
| Empty Cell | Q | Force sensitivity (N/Hz0.5) | T (K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monocrystal Si182 | 1.5 × 105 | 8.2 × 10−19 | 0.11 |
| Monocrystal diamond183 | 6 × 106 | 5 × 10−19 | 0.093 |
| Monocrystal-strained Si184 | 1010 | 5 × 10−20 | 7 |
| Hierarchical Si3N4185 | 1.1 × 109 | 9 × 10−20 | 6 |
| Si3N4 nanostring186 | 2.3 × 109 | 9.6 × 10−21 | 0.046 |
| Single CNT181 | 6 × 106 | 4.3 × 10−21 | 0.3 |
Fig. 10. CNT-based electromechanical resonator. a, Measurement schematic and SEM image of the suspended nanotube. b, Mechanical vibrations are cooled to 4.6 ± 2.0 quanta (n) at Vsd = 0.565 mV. Reprinted with permission from ref.180. © 2019 Nature Publishing Group. |
HALL SENSORS
Fig. 11. Graphene-based Hall sensor. a, Optical microscope image and schematic diagram of the graphene Hall sensor encapsulated in h-BN. b, Magnetic field dependence of Hall resistance in the quantum Hall regime at 4.2 K. c, Hall coefficient RH and magnetic sensing sensitivity as a function of gate voltage Vg at 3 T. Reprinted with permission from ref.196. © 2020 Nature Publishing Group. d, Hall voltage response at 1.5 K of Paragraf's graphene Hall sensor and a commercially available 2DEG sensor between 0 and 30 T. Reprinted with permission from ref.197. © 2021 Paragraf Limited. e, Quantum Hall resistance standard in graphene-based devices compared with GaAs/AlGaAs devices. f, Examples of convenient combinations of relaxed operational conditions in graphene-based devices. Reprinted with permission from ref.201. © 2015 Nature Publishing Group. |
JOSEPHSON PARAMETRIC AMPLIFIERS
Fig. 12. Graphene-based parametric amplifier. a, Schematic diagram of the graphene JJ-based parametric amplifier. b, Parametric amplification and the measured system noise temperature, which is very close to the SQL (green dashed line)214. c, Parametric amplification in the Ti/Al contacted parametric amplifier. d, Gate voltage tuning of the amplifier215. Reprinted with permission from refs.214,215. © 2022 Nature Publishing Group. |
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
Outlook
Fig. 13. A-CNT-based FET. a, Schematic diagram of A-CNT-based FET. b, Transfer characteristics of a 400 nm A-CNT-FET measured from 300 K to 1.8 K under various applied bias voltages. c, Output characteristics of a 400 nm A-CNT-FET measured at 300 K and 1.8 K, respectively. |

