INTRODUCTION
Table 1. A comparison of different refrigeration technologies. |
| Refrigeration technologies | The lowest temperature | Cooling power | Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-optical refrigeration technologies | Dilution refrigeration | ∼ 1.75 mK57 | 20 µW @10 mK57 | High |
| Adiabatic demagnetization refrigeration | ∼ 22 mK from 2 K136 | NA | High | |
| Superconducting tunnel junction refrigeration | ∼ 30 mK from 150 mK 35 | ∼ 40 pW35 | High | |
| Thermoelectric refrigeration | ∼ 120 K135 | NA | Low | |
| Optical refrigeration technologies | Laser cooling of the rare-earth doped solids | ∼ 91 K134 | ∼ 50 mW134 | Low |
| Laser cooling of semiconductors | Net cooling by 40 K from 290 K47 | ∼ 180 mW @514 nm47 | Low | |
SEVERAL NON-OPTICAL REFRIGERATION TECHNOLOGIES
Dilution refrigeration
Fig. 1. Dilution refrigerators. a, Left panel: The location of the cryogenic quantum chips inside the dilution refrigerator and the position of the cryo-controller. Right panel: The top and bottom views of the 3-K plate, showing the mounted chip enclosure and the fixed holder for the enclosure, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref.4. © 2021 Nature Publishing Group. b, Schematic diagram of the low-temperature part of a wet dilution refrigerator (the dilution unit). c, Schematic diagram of a dry dilution refrigerator with two-stage pulse tube refrigerators. Reprinted with permission from ref.60. © 2022 Elsevier. |
Adiabatic demagnetization refrigeration
Fig. 2. Adiabatic demagnetization refrigeration. a, The four processes of a magnetic refrigeration cycle: adiabatic magnetization, remove heat, adiabatic demagnetization, and cool refrigerator. b, The maximum magnetic entropy changes for ΔH = 5 T versus peak temperature Tpeak for different families of magnetocaloric materials. Reprinted with permission from ref.32. © 2012 Annual Reviews Inc. |
Superconducting tunnel junction refrigeration
Fig. 3. Refrigeration based on superconducting tunnel junctions. a, Energy level diagram of the NIS junctions. Red area: occupied states; green states: available states. b, Micrograph of a 370nm thick membrane cooled by NIS junctions. c, Cross-sectional device schematic showing critical nanoscale dimensions. d, The measured temperature of the suspended Cu stage plotted versus time in hours. Reprinted with permission from ref.79. © 2013 American Institute of Physics. |
Thermoelectric refrigeration
Fig. 4. Thermoelectric refrigeration. a, Schematic diagram of a thermoelectric refrigerator. b, A comparison of the COP between thermoelectric cooling systems (red symbols) and vapor compression refrigerators (blue symbols). The solid lines are calculated by assuming that the hot-side temperature is 300 K, and the COP is calculated using constant ZTm values. Reprinted with permission from ref.96. © 2021 Nature Publishing Group. |
EMERGING OPTICAL REFRIGERATION TECHNOLOGIES
The fields of laser cooling of solids
Fig. 5. Principles of optical refrigeration of rare-earth ion doped solids. a, Three kinds of main energy engaged in the process of the optical refrigeration of rare-earth ion doped solids. 1: Photons from the pump laser; 2: Phonons from the host crystal; 3: Electrons of the doped ions. b, Energy levels and major transitions of Yb3+ doped in ZBLAN. c, The four-level energy model for optical refrigeration consisting of two pairs of levels in the ground states (E0 and E1) and excited (E2 and E3) states. Reprinted with permission from ref.99. © 2007 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). |
Laser cooling of the rare-earth doped solids
Fig. 6. Progress of optical refrigeration of rare-earth ion doped solids. a, Experimental schematics of the single-pass optical cooling setup. b, Emission spectra (red line) and absorption spectra (blue line) of 3% Yb3+-doped in YAG crystal at 300 K, in which the dash line and the blue shaded region denote the mean fluorescence wavelength and the cooling tail, respectively. c, The temperature dependence on the pump power of the laser 1030 and 1048 nm, respectively. d, The cooling window of the 3% Yb3+-doped YAG crystal, which depicts the dependence of cooling efficiency on the temperature and pump wavelength. The blue and red regions denote the cooling and heating regimes, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref.105. © 2021 American Institute of Physics. |
Laser cooling of semiconductors
Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of the process for laser cooling of a semiconductor where a pump laser photon with energy ℏωp is absorbed followed by emission of an up-converted fluorescence photon with energy ℏωf (corresponding to the process 1). Process 2: Electrons and holes undergo non-radiative recombination and multiphonon emission happens. |
Fig. 8. Progress of laser cooling of semiconductors. a, Laser cooling pump-probe luminescence thermometry. The top panel: False color scanning electron microscope image of a single CdS nanobelt suspended on a SiO2/Si substrate. The bottom panel: Measurement set-up with pump and probe laser beams. b, Multiple-LOP-assisted up-conversion spectra of CdS nanobelts. c, Evolution of the pump-probe luminescence thermometry spectra starting from 290 K, pumped by a 514-nm laser with a power of, 6.3 mW. Solid curves: cooling cycle; dash curves: pump laser is switched off. d, Temperature change, ΔT, versus time pumped by four laser lines (532, 514, 502 and 488 nm), using data extracted from the pump-probe luminescence thermometry around 290 K. Reprinted with permission from ref.47 © 2013 Nature Nature Publishing Group. e, The measured PL spectra of exciton transitions and Raman spectra of LOP of 120-nm ZnTe nanobelts at 225K. f, Schematic diagram of the principle of the resolved-sideband cooling LOP with red-detuned laser and LOP phonon modes. g, Occupation number and the temperature of the LOP versus pump power. Reprinted with permission from ref.133. © 2016 Nature Publishing Group. h, Schematic diagram of the principle of the resolved-sideband cooling optical phonons in 2-demonsional van der Waals semiconductors. i, Occupation number and the temperature of the phonons versus pump power. Reprinted with permission from ref.45. © 2022 American Chemical Society. |

