指南解读

2025年《美国胃肠病学会临床指南:胃癌前病变诊治指南》解读

  • 邹天慧
展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院消化科,上海 200001

收稿日期: 2025-05-16

  修回日期: 2025-07-09

  录用日期: 2025-08-04

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-09

Interpretation of 2025 American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Gastric Precancerous Lesions

  • ZOU Tianhui
Expand
  • Department of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200001, China

Received date: 2025-05-16

  Revised date: 2025-07-09

  Accepted date: 2025-08-04

  Online published: 2025-09-09

摘要

2022年,全球胃癌新发病例约97万例,死亡病例约66万例,其中东亚地区(如中国、日本、韩国)是主要高发区域。尽管2010年至2020年间,我国的胃癌发病率和死亡率呈缓慢下降趋势,但由于人口基数大、早期筛查普及不足,疾病负担依然沉重。2025年,美国胃肠病学会(American College of Gastroenterology, ACG)发布了《美国胃肠病学会临床指南:胃癌前病变诊治指南》。该指南的核心内容包括,①个体化风险评估:基于年龄、幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pyloriHp)感染、家族史等因素筛选高风险人群;②高质量内镜技术规范:指南推荐,采用高清白光内镜联合图像增强技术[如窄带成像技术(narrow band imaging, NBI)],提高病变检出率,并强调活检病理的标准化;采用可操作的与胃癌风险联系的胃炎评估(operative link for gastritis assessment,OLGA)和可操作的与胃癌风险联系的肠化生评估(operative link for gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment,OLGIM)分期评估胃癌风险,进行风险分层与监测,同时强调了Hp根除的核心地位;③内镜监测和随访间隔。该指南对我国胃癌防治具有重要启示,包括进一步优化筛查策略,如结合国情推行高风险人群精准筛查,探索结直肠癌与胃癌联合筛查模式;继续提升内镜诊疗水平,加强基层医师培训,推广高质量内镜技术(如NBI放大内镜);强化Hp感染防控,推行家庭聚集性感染的同步筛查与治疗;完善监测体系,如借鉴OLGA/OLGIM分层,制定个体化监测间隔;填补证据缺口,如开展前瞻性研究验证监测间隔的合理性,研发无创生物标志物。尽管ACG指南部分建议证据等级较低,但其规范化框架为我国胃癌早诊、早治提供了重要参考,有助于突破当前筛查覆盖率低、进展期胃癌占比高的困境,最终降低疾病负担。

本文引用格式

邹天慧 . 2025年《美国胃肠病学会临床指南:胃癌前病变诊治指南》解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025 , 24(04) : 393 -400 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.04.005

Abstract

In 2022, there were approximately 970 000 new cases and 660 000 deaths from gastric cancer worldwide, with East Asia (such as China, Japan, and South Korea) being the main high-incidence regions. Although the incidence rate and mortality rate of gastric cancer in China showed a slow decline from 2010 to 2020, the disease burden remains heavy due to the large population and insufficient early screening coverage. In 2025, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) released the American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Gastric Precancerous Lesions. The core content of the guidelines includes: ① individualized risk assessment: high-risk populations should be screened based on factors such as age, Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection, and family history. ② High-quality endoscopic technical standards: the guidelines recommend using high-definition white-light endoscopy with image-enhanced technologies (such as narrow band imaging, NBI) to improve lesion detection rates and emphasize the standardization of biopsy pathology. It also recommends using the operative link for gastritis assessment (OLGA) and operative link for gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) staging systems for gastric cancer risk stratification and surveillance, while emphasizing the core position of Hp eradication. ③ Endoscopic monitoring and follow-up intervals: the guidelines have important implications for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer in China, including optimizing screening strategies, such as implementing precision screening for high-risk populations based on China's conditions and exploring combined screening models for colorectal and gastric cancer. It is essential to continue to improve the capabilities of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment, strengthen the training of grassroots physicians, advance high-quality endoscopic techniques (such as NBI magnifying endoscopy), strengthen Hp infection prevention and control, and implement synchronous screening and treatment for household clusters of infection. The surveillance system should be improved by referencing OLGA/OLGIM stratification to establish personalized monitoring intervals. Concurrently, evidence gaps must be addressed by conducting prospective studies to validate the rationality of surveillance intervals and developing non-invasive biomar-kers. Although some recommendations in the ACG guidelines are supported by limited evidence, the standardized framework provides important reference for early detection and treatment of gastric cancer in China. This approach helps address current challenges such as low screening coverage and high proportion of advanced-stage cases, ultimately reducing the di-sease burden.

参考文献

[1] BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3):229-263.
[2] PABLA B S, SHAH S C, CORRAL J E, et al. Increased incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in immigrant populations from high to low regions of incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 18(2):347-359,e5.
[3] KIM T H, KIM I H, KANG S J, et al. Korean Practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2022: an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2023, 23(1):3-106.
[4] MORGAN D R, CORRAL J E, LI D, et al. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of gastric premalignant conditions[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2025, 120(4):709-737.
[5] RYU J E, CHOI E, LEE K, et al. Trends in the performance of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program for gastric cancer from 2007 to 2016[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2022, 54(3):842-849.
[6] JUN J K, CHOI K S, LEE H Y, et al. Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in reducing gastric cancer mortality[J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 152(6):1319-1328.e7.
[7] ZHANG X, LI M, CHEN S, et al. Endoscopic screening in Asian countries is associated with reduced gastric cancer mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Gastroenterology, 2018, 155(2):347-354.e9.
[8] PIMENTA-MELO A R, MONTEIRO-SOARES M, LIB?NIO D, et al. Missing rate for gastric cancer during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 28(9):1041-1049.
[9] PIAZUELO M B, BRAVO L E, MERA R M, et al. The colombian chemoprevention trial: 20-year follow-up of a cohort of patients with gastric precancerous lesions[J]. Gastroenterology, 2021, 160(4):1106-1117.e3.
[10] GRAHAM D Y, ZOU W Y. Guilt by association: intestinal metaplasia does not progress to gastric cancer[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2018, 34(6):458-464.
[11] KAMINISHI M, YAMAGUCHI H, NOMURA S, et al. Endoscopic classification of chronic gastritis based on a pilot study by the research society for gastritis[J]. Dig Endosc, 2002, 14(4):138-151.
[12] NAGATA N, SHIMBO T, AKIYAMA J, et al. Predictabi-lity of gastric intestinal metaplasia by mottled patchy erythema seen on endoscopy[J]. Gastroenterology Res, 2011, 4(5):203-209.
[13] UEDO N, ISHIHARA R, IISHI H, et al. A new method of diagnosing gastric intestinal metaplasia: narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy[J]. Endoscopy, 2006, 38(8):819-824.
[14] KANEMITSU T, YAO K, NAGAHAMA T, et al. Exten-ding magnifying NBI diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia in the stomach: the white opaque substance marker[J]. Endoscopy, 2017, 49(6):529-535.
[15] GAWRON A J, SHAH S C, ALTAYAR O, et al. AGA technical review on gastric intestinal metaplasia-natural history and clinical outcomes[J]. Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(3):705-731,e5.
[16] LEE J W J, ZHU F, SRIVASTAVA S, et al. Severity of gastric intestinal metaplasia predicts the risk of gastric cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (GCEP)[J]. Gut, 2022, 71(5):854-863.
[17] KANEMITSU T, UEDO N, ONO T, et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for diagnosis of subtype of gastric intestinal metaplasia[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 38(1):94-102.
[18] PIMENTEL-NUNES P, DINIS-RIBEIRO M, SOARES J B, et al. A multicenter validation of an endoscopic classification with narrow band imaging for gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions[J]. Endoscopy, 2012, 44(3):236-246.
[19] PIMENTEL-NUNES P, LIB?NIO D, LAGE J, et al. A multicenter prospective study of the real-time use of narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of premalignant gastric conditions and lesions[J]. Endoscopy, 2016, 48(8):723-730.
[20] ESPOSITO G, PIMENTEL-NUNES P, ANGELETTI S, et al. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM): a multicenter validation study[J]. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(6):515-521.
[21] ZHAO G, XUE M, HU Y, et al. How commonly is the diagnosis of gastric low grade dysplasia upgraded followi-ng endoscopic resection? A meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(7):e0132699.
[22] FORD A C, YUAN Y, MOAYYEDI P. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy to prevent gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gut, 2020, 69(12):2113-2121.
[23] LI D, JIANG S F, LEI N Y, et al. Effect of helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on the incidence of noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma in a large diverse population in the United States[J]. Gastroenterology, 2023, 165(2):391-401,e2.
[24] FREEDBERG D E, KIM L S, YANG Y X. The risks and benefits of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: expert review and best practice advice from the American Gastroenterological Association[J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 152(4):706-715.
[25] SEO S I, PARK C H, YOU S C, et al. Association between proton pump inhibitor use and gastric cancer: a population-based cohort study using two different types of nationwide databases in Korea[J]. Gut, 2021, 70(11):2066-2075.
[26] RUGGE M, BRICCA L, GUZZINATI S, et al. Autoimmune gastritis: long-term natural history in na?ve Helicobacter pylori-negative patients[J]. Gut, 2023, 72(1):30-38.
文章导航

/