收稿日期: 2025-06-24
修回日期: 2025-08-14
录用日期: 2025-12-16
网络出版日期: 2026-04-25
基金资助
上海市科学技术委员会基金(25TS1405600)
Value of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in differentiating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from uncinate process of pancreas
Received date: 2025-06-24
Revised date: 2025-08-14
Accepted date: 2025-12-16
Online published: 2026-04-25
目的:在68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT图像中,观察胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(neuroendocrine tumor, NET)、胰腺钩突组织及其他胰腺肿瘤对68Ga-DOTATATE摄取的差异,分析其鉴别效能。方法:2020年1月至2022年6月,连续入组因怀疑NET而进行68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT检查的患者133例(58例经病理确诊为胰腺NET,12例经病理确诊为胰腺其他肿瘤,63例经随访确认为非胰腺肿瘤)。回顾性分析病例资料,共获取158个68Ga-DOTATATE高摄取的目标区域,将目标区域分为胰腺钩突生理摄取、胰腺NET和其他胰腺肿瘤3组。比较3组间目标区域在68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT图像上最大标准摄取值(maximum standard uptake value, SUVmax)和平均标准摄取值(mean standard uptake value, SUVmean)的差异,计算目标区域与脾脏(SUVmax-T/SUVmax-S、SUVmean-T/SUVmean-S)或者肝脏(SUVmax-T/SUVmax-L、SUVmean-T/SUVmean-L)摄取值的比值。采用受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC) 曲线分析评估不同参数对胰腺不同病灶的鉴别能力。结果:胰腺NET对68Ga-DOTATATE的摄取显著高于其他胰腺肿瘤及钩突生理摄取[SUVmax依次为(54.87±35.77)、(27.70±51.55)、(8.94±3.04),P均<0.05;SUVmean依次为(32.76±23.04)、(14.79±28.15)、(6.28±2.11),P均<0.05]。其他胰腺肿瘤对68Ga-DOTATATE的摄取高于钩突,但除SUVmax以外,其他参数在两者间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。SUVmax-T/SUVmax-S比值能准确地鉴别胰腺NET与非胰腺NET(胰腺其他肿瘤或胰腺钩突生理性摄取),当最佳临界值为大于0.802时,AUC为0.929,灵敏度为0.855,特异度为0.948。结论:在68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT检查中,胰腺钩突存在生理摄取的现象,SUVmax-T/SUVmax-S比值和SUVmean-T/SUVmean-S比值相关参数能准确鉴别胰腺NET与钩突生理摄取及胰腺其他肿瘤。
关键词: 神经内分泌肿瘤; 胰腺钩突; 68Ga-DOTATATE; PET/CT; 受试者操作特征
李翔 , 黄新韵 , 郭睿 , 李彪 , 周熠磊 . 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT在鉴别胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤与钩突中的价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026 , 25(02) : 193 -199 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2026.02.010
Objective To observe the differences in 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake among pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET), the tissues of the pancreatic uncinate process, and other pancreatic tumors in 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT images, and to analyze their diagnostic performance. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 133 consecutively enrolled patients who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT between January 2020 and June 2022 for suspected NET (58 cases were pathologically diagnosed with pancreatic NET, 12 cases with other pancreatic tumors, and 63 cases were confirmed as having non-pancreatic tumors during follow-up). Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and a total of 158 target regions with high 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake were obtained and divided into three groups: physiological uptake in the pancreatic uncinate process, pancreatic NET, and other pancreatic tumors. Differences in maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) among these groups were compared. The ratios of uptake in the target region to the spleen (SUVmax-T/SUVmax-S, SUVmean-T/SUVmean-S) or the liver (SUVmax-T/SUVmax-L, SUVmean-T/SUVmean-L) were calculated. The receiver opera-ting characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic ability of different parameters for various pancreatic lesions. Results 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake in pancreatic NET was significantly higher than those in the physiological uptake in the uncinate process and other pancreatic tumors (SUVmax values were 54.87±35.77, 27.70±51.55, and 8.94±3.04, respectively, all P<0.05; SUVmean values were 32.76±23.04, 14.79±28.15, and 6.28±2.11, respectively, all P<0.05). The uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE in other pancreatic tumors was higher than that in the uncinate process, and except for SUVmax, there were no statistically significant differences in other parameters between the two groups (P>0.05). The SUVmax-T/SUVmax-S ratio accurately differentiated pancreatic NET from non-pancreatic NET (other pancreatic tumors or physiological uptake in the pancreatic uncinate process), with an AUC of 0.929, a sensitivity of 0.855, a specificity of 0.948, and an optimal cutoff value greater than 0.802. Conclusions Physiological uptake can be observed in the pancreatic uncinate process on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Parameters related to the SUVmax-T/SUVmax-S and SUVmean-T/SUVmean-S ratios can accurately distinguish pancreatic NET from the physiological uptake in the pancreatic uncinate process and other pancreatic tumors.
| [1] | MA Z Y, GONG Y F, ZHUANG H K, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(19):2305-2322. |
| [2] | 庞超宇, 高鑫, 樊知遥, 等. 炎症标志物在预测胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤预后中的应用进展[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(5):680-684. |
| PANG C Y, GAO X, FAN Z Y, et al. Advances in prognostic value of inflammatory markers in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2024, 23(5):680-684. | |
| [3] | CHILOIRO S, LANZA F, BIANCHI A, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in MEN1 disease: A mono-centric longitudinal and prognostic study[J]. Endocrine, 2018, 60(2):362-367. |
| [4] | ROZENBLUM L, MOKRANE F Z, YEH R, et al. The role of multimodal imaging in guiding resectability and cytoreduction in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Focus on PET and MRI[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2019, 44(7):2474-2493. |
| [5] | HAIDAR M, AL MAHMASANI L, CHEHADE L, et al. Well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with positive FDG-PET/CT: A retrospective chart review[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2023, 44(6):471-479. |
| [6] | KANDATHIL A, SUBRAMANIAM R M. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor diagnosis[J]. PET Clin, 2023, 18(2):189-200. |
| [7] | JACOBSSON H, LARSSON P, JONSSON C, et al. Normal uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC by the pancreas uncinate process mimicking malignancy at somatostatin receptor PET[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2012, 37(4):362-365. |
| [8] | BREEMAN W A P, DE JONG M, DE BLOIS E, et al. Radiolabelling DOTA-peptides with 68Ga[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag, 2005, 32(4):478-485. |
| [9] | HORNG A, INGENERF M, BERGER F, et al. Synchronous neuroendocine liver metastases in comparison to primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on MRI and SSR-PET/CT[J]. Front Oncol, 2024,14:1352538. |
| [10] | HAUG AR, ROMINGER A, MUSTAFA M, et al. Treatment with octreotide does not reduce tumor uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE as measured by PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors[J]. J Nucl Med, 2011, 52(11):1679-1683. |
| [11] | CUTHBERTSON D J, BARRIUSO J, LAMARCA A, et al. The impact of 68Gallium DOTA PET/CT in managing patients with sporadic and familial pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2021,12:654975. |
| [12] | HAUG A R, AUERNHAMMER C J, W?NGLER B, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for the early prediction of response to somatostatin receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors[J]. J Nucl Med, 2010, 51(9):1349-1356. |
| [13] | HAUG A, AUERNHAMMER C J, W?NGLER B, et al. Intraindividual comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 18F-DOPA PET in patients with well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumours[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag, 2009, 36(5):765-770. |
| [14] | INGENERF M, KARIM H, AUERNHAMMER C, et al. Quantitative SSTR-PET/CT for predicting response and survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors receiving CAPTEM[J]. Radiol Oncol, 2023, 57(4):436-445. |
| [15] | SCHMID-TANNWALD C, SCHMID-TANNWALD C M, MORELLI J N, et al. Comparison of abdominal MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging to 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in detection of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag, 2013, 40(6):897-907. |
| [16] | GABRIEL M, DECRISTOFORO C, KENDLER D, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: Comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT[J]. J Nucl Med, 2007, 48(4):508-518. |
| [17] | 姜蕾, 姜毓, 苏颋为, 等. 11例胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤所致异位ACTH综合征的临床特征与治疗经验[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2026, 42(2):96-101. |
| JIANG L, JIANG Y, SU T W, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment experience of 11 cases of ectopic ACTH syndrome caused by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors[J]. Chin J Endocrinol Metab, 2026, 42(2):96-101. | |
| [18] | PRASAD V, BAUM R P. Biodistribution of the Ga-68 labeled somatostatin analogue DOTA-NOC in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: characterization of uptake in normal organs and tumor lesions[J]. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2010, 54(1):61-67. |
| [19] | 袁吉, 罗再, 王悦玲, 等. 影像组学驱动的肿瘤内异质性评估[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2025, 24(12):1654-1660. |
| YUAN J, LUO Z, WANG Y L, et al. Radiomics-driven assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2025, 24(12):1654-1660. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |