Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice >
Value of synthetic MRI in predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Received date: 2024-10-02
Accepted date: 2024-12-30
Online published: 2025-07-11
Objective To explore the effectiveness of synthetic MRI sequences in predicting the treatment response of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment (nCRT). Methods A total of 51 patients with biopsy-confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled at Ruijin Hospital from August 2023 to June 2024. All patients were assessed as having LARC by baseline MRI and received nCRT followed by radical surgery. All subjects completed synthetic MRI and high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) scans within two weeks before receiving nCRT treatment. Based on high-resolution T2WI images, radiologists assessed extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) at baseline in the subjects. After the synthetic MRI sequence scanning was completed, synthetic images of T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and proton density (PD) mapping were generated using Synthetic MR post-processing software. Histogram-based quantitative parameters at baseline were extracted using python software, including quantitative parame-ters of the primary tumor and peritumoral fat region: T1 relaxation time (T1RT), T2 relaxation time (T2RT), and proton density (PD). Using postoperative pathological results as the gold standard, patients were grouped according to: (1) primary tumor response: pathological complete response (pCR) vs. non-pCR; (2) tumor regression grade: (TRG) 0-1 vs. TRG 2-3; and (3) mesorectal lymph node metastasis status: positive (ypN+) vs. negative (ypN-). Differences in baseline mrEMVI status and quantitative parameters of the primary tumor and peritumoral fat among different groups were compared using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for predicting TRG grade, pCR status, and mesorectal lymph node status. Based on the selected risk factors, logistic regression models were established. The predictive performance of the quantitative parameters, mrEMVI status, and the regression models for TRG grade, pCR status, and mesorectal lymph node status was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Baseline mrEMVI positivity (P=0.03) and quantitative parameters of peritumoral fat tissue-including the maximum T2RT_Fat (139.53 ms vs. 129.60 ms, P=0.03), 90th percentile (189.18 ms vs. 174.00 ms, P=0.03), root mean square (120.09 ms vs. 115.48 ms, P=0.04), and lower T2RT_Fat uniformity (0.54 vs. 0.61, P=0.04)—were indicative of positive mesorectal lymph node status after nCRT. None of the observed indicators were correlated with the primary tumor response. Logistic regression analysis showed that mrEMVI and elevated T2RT_Fat_P90 were independent risk factors for predicting mesorectal lymph node metastasis. The logistic regression model combining both mrEMVI (AUC=0.667) and T2RT_Fat_P90 (AUC=0.692) demonstrated good predictive performance (AUC=0.747), although the improvement was not statistically significant. Conclusions T2RT_Fat_P90, extracted from baseline MAGiC synthetic MRI serves as a non-invasive imaging biomarker for predicting mesorectal lymph node metastasis after nCRT. The combination of T2RT_Fat_P90 and baseline mrEMVI can be used as an auxiliary tool for predicting the mesorectal lymph node metastasis status in LARC patients following nCRT.
WANG Kangning , ZHU Lan , FENG Weiming , XIA Yihan , SHI Bowen , ZHANG Huan . Value of synthetic MRI in predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2025 , 24(02) : 170 -177 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.02.008
| [1] | SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2021,71(3): 209-249. |
| [2] | 范伯男, 李岩. 全球主要疾病负担及健康状况趋势分析——1990年至2021年全球疾病和伤害负担报告解读 [J]. 诊断学理论与实践,2024,23(5):474-483. |
| FAN B, LI Y. Trends in global major disease burden and health conditions—interpretation of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2021[J]. J Diagn Concepts Pract, 2024,23(5):474-483. | |
| [3] | BENSON A B, VENOOK A P, ADAM M, et al. Colon Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2024,22(2 D). |
| [4] | HABR-GAMA A, PEREZ R O, NADALIN W, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results[J]. Ann Surg,2004,240(4):711-717; discussion 7-8. |
| [5] | MAAS M, NELEMANS P J, VALENTINI V, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data[J]. Lancet Oncol,2010,11(9):835-44. |
| [6] | PAHLMAN L, BOHE M, CEDERMARK B, et al. The Swedish rectal cancer registry[J]. Br J Surg,2007,94(10):1285-1292. |
| [7] | TULCHINSKY H, SHMUELI E, FIGER A, et al. An interval >7 weeks between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery improves pathologic complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2008,15(10):2661-2667. |
| [8] | VAN DER PAARDT M P, ZAGERS M B, BEETS-TAN R G, et al. Patients who undergo preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer restaged by using diagnostic MR imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Radiology,2013,269(1):101-112. |
| [9] | SEO N, KIM H, CHO M S, et al. Response assessment with MRI after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: current evidences[J]. Korean J Radiol,2019,20(7):1003-1018. |
| [10] | ZHANG S, YU M, CHEN D, et al. Role of MRI-based radiomics in locally advanced rectal cancer (Review)[J]. Oncol Rep,2022,47(2):34. |
| [11] | RAFAELSEN S R, VAGN-HANSEN C, SORENSEN T, et al. Ultrasound elastography in patients with rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation[J]. Eur J Radiol,2013,82(6):913-917. |
| [12] | HAGIWARA A, FUJIMOTO K, KAMAGATA K, et al. Age-related changes in relaxation times, proton density, myelin, and tissue volumes in adult brain analyzed by 2-dimensional quantitative synthetic magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Invest Radiol,2021,56(3):163-172. |
| [13] | WARNTJES J B, LEINHARD O D, WEST J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage[J]. Magn Reson Med,2008,60(2): 320-329. |
| [14] | KUMAR N M, FRITZ B, STERN S E, et al. Synthetic MRI of the knee: phantom validation and comparison with conventional MRI[J]. Radiology,2018,289(2):465-477. |
| [15] | CUI Y, HAN S, LIU M, et al. Diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer by relaxation maps from synthetic MRI [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2020,52(2):552-564. |
| [16] | LIAN S, LIU H, MENG T, et al. Quantitative synthetic MRI for predicting locally advanced rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy[J]. Eur Radiol,2023,33(3):1737-1745. |
| [17] | SMITH N J, SHIHAB O, ARNAOUT A, et al. MRI for detection of extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer[J]. Am J Roentgenol,2008,191(5):1517-1522. |
| [18] | ZHANG L N, XIAO W W, XI S Y, et al. Pathological Assessment of the AJCC tumor regression grading system after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for chinese locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2016,95(3):e2272. |
| [19] | RINGEL A E, DRIJVERS J M, BAKER G J, et al. Obesity shapes metabolism in the tumor microenvironment to suppress anti-tumor immunity[J]. Cell,2020,183(7):1848-1866. |
| [20] | JENSEN M D. Visceral fat: culprit or canary? [J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am,2020,49(2):229-237. |
| [21] | LINO-SILVA L S, SALCEDO-HERNANDEZ R A, GAMBOA-DOMINGUEZ A. Tumour budding in rectal cancer. A comprehensive review[J]. Contemp Oncol (Pozn),2018,22(2):61-74. |
| [22] | 多中心直肠癌真实世界数据库建设与数据质量控制策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2025,24(1):77-81. |
| Multicenter rectal cancer real-world database construction and data quality control strategies[J]. Chin Dig Surg, 2025,24(1):77-81. | |
| [23] | 李珂璇, 肖体先, 汪晓东, 等. 中低位直肠癌初诊及新辅助治疗后评估完成度分析:全国多中心真实世界研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2025,24(1):113-119. |
| LI K X, XIAO T X, WANG X D, et al. Analysis of completion rate of tumor evaluation at initial assessment and after neoadjuvant therapy for mid and low rectal cancer : a national multicenter real-world study[J]. Chin J Dig Surg,2025,24(1):113-119. | |
| [24] | 毛翌皓, 冯青阳, 许剑民. 人工智能时代机器人结直肠癌手术的现状及进展[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(4): 573-578. |
| MAO Y H, FENG Q Y, XU J M. Current status and progress of robotic colorectal cancer surgery in the era of artificial intelli-gence[J]. Chin J Dig Surg,2024,23(4):573-578. | |
| [25] | SHIROUZU K, ISOMOTO H, KAKEGAWA T, et al. A prospective clinicopathologic study of venous invasion in colorectal cancer[J]. Am J Surg,1991,162(3):216-222. |
| [26] | KRASNA M J, FLANCBAUM L, CODY R P, et al. Vascular and neural invasion in colorectal carcinoma. Incidence and prognostic significance[J]. Cancer,1988,61(5):1018-1023. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |