内科理论与实践 ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (02): 183-187.doi: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2026.02.13
收稿日期:2026-02-04
修回日期:2026-02-28
接受日期:2026-03-26
出版日期:2026-04-25
发布日期:2026-06-15
通讯作者:
邓贤坤 E-mail:676253801@qq.com
作者简介:作者贡献/Authors’ Contributions张敏负责文献收集及初稿撰写;邓贤坤负责内容审校。
Received:2026-02-04
Revised:2026-02-28
Accepted:2026-03-26
Online:2026-04-25
Published:2026-06-15
摘要:
本文综述了抗胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素(thymic stromal lymphopoietin,TSLP)单克隆抗体特泽利尤单抗(tezepelumab)在重度哮喘治疗中的研究进展。哮喘是一种慢性气道炎症性疾病,全球患病率高且控制率低,尤其是重度哮喘患者对常规治疗反应不佳。TSLP作为上皮来源的警报素,位于炎症级联反应顶端,可驱动多种哮喘表型的病理过程。特泽利尤单抗作为全人源抗TSLP单克隆抗体,通过特异性结合TSLP并阻断其与TSLP受体(TSLP receptor,TSLPR)的相互作用,减少白介素(interleukin,IL)4、IL-5、IL-13等2型炎症因子的产生。多项动物实验及临床试验表明,抗TSLP抗体能显著减轻气道炎症,降低气道高反应性,抑制气道重塑,降低哮喘年化急性加重率,延长至首次发作持续时间,改善肺功能[如第1秒用力呼气量(forced expiratory volume in the first second,FEV1)],降低血嗜酸性粒细胞计数、呼出气一氧化氮(fractional exhaled nitric oxide,FeNO)及总免疫球蛋白E(immunoglobulin E,IgE)水平,并在不同炎症表型患者中均显示出疗效。
张敏, 邓贤坤. 胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素单克隆抗体在重度哮喘治疗中的研究进展[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2026, 21(02): 183-187.
ZHANG Min, DENG Xiankun. Research progress on the application of thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody in the treatment of severe asthma[J]. Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice, 2026, 21(02): 183-187.
表1
抗TSLP抗体改善哮喘的动物实验
| 作者及年份 | 动物品系 | 抗TSLP抗体剂量及持续时间 | 结 果 |
| IFN-γ:干扰素γ(interferon γ);OVA:卵清蛋白(ovalbumin);mRNA:信使RNA(messenger RNA);TGF-β1:转化生长因子-β1(transforming growth factor-beta 1)。 | |||
| Shi等[ (2008) | 8~10周龄雌性BALB/c哮喘小鼠模型 | 20 μg抗TSLPR或Ig经气管内 注射;致敏前30 min | 局部使用抗TSLPR抗体可减少气道炎症、Th2偏移和黏液产生,降低IL-4和IL-5水平,上调IFN-γ产生;阻断改变气道DC的成熟和迁移;阻断损害DC在体外启动Th2反应能力 |
| Zhang等[ (2011) | 雌性BALB/c过敏性哮喘小鼠模型 | 20 μg TSLPR-Ig; 致敏前30 min | TSLPR-Ig抑制共刺激分子表达;显著降低炎症细胞浸润水平和过敏性气道反应的严重程度;抑制OVA-DC诱导哮喘小鼠Th2偏移的能力;抑制过敏原特异性IgE合成 |
| Chen等[ (2013) | 6~8 周龄雌性BALB/c哮喘小鼠模型 | 20 μg抗TSLP mAb; 致敏前1 h | 抗TSLP mAb处理显著抑制肺中TSLP mRNA和蛋白水平的增加;消除气道EOS炎症,降低气道高反应性;通过抑制支气管周围胶原沉积和杯状细胞增生,预防气道结构重塑;下调TGF-β1水平;调节Th1/Th2平衡;抑制气道CD11c+细胞表面标志物表达 |
| Lee等[ (2020) | 7~8周龄雌性 BALB/c哮喘小鼠模型 | 1 mg/kg抗TSLP抗体; 激发前2 h | 抗TSLP治疗显著降低对乙酰甲胆碱的呼吸系统阻力;显著减少总炎性细胞和EOS计数;减少炎症细胞积聚,减少上皮和杯状细胞增生及黏液分泌;有效抑制肺组织中TSLP、IL-33、IL-5和IL-13表达;降低总IgE和OVA特异性IgG1水平 |
| Cheng等[ (2013) | 3~10 kg经猪蛔虫抗原致敏的食蟹猴 | 每周7.5 mg/kgTSLP mAb; 持续6周 | TSLP mAb处理组BALF中EOS浸润水平、IL-13细胞因子均显著降低,且过敏原诱导的气道阻力经TSLP处理也显著降低 |
表2
特泽利尤单抗改善哮喘的临床试验
| 作者及年份 | 队列名称 | 特泽利尤单抗剂量及 持续时间 | 结 果 |
| AQLQ(S)+12:12周岁及以上标准化AQLQ(standardized AQLQ for 12 years and older);HRQoL:健康相关生命质量(health-related quality of life)。 | |||
| Corren等[ | 2期临床试验,18~75岁,患有哮喘的非吸烟者 | 70 mg/4周、210 mg/4周、 280 mg/2周,持续52周 | 特泽利尤单抗组哮喘加重年化率比安慰剂组降低,其首次哮喘急性发作的发生时间较安慰剂组更长,52周时支气管舒张剂前FEV1的变化比安慰剂组更大。血液EOS计数、FeNO水平均出现显著且持续下降,总血清IgE也呈逐步下降趋势 |
| Diver等[ | 2期临床试验,18~75岁,中重度未控制哮喘 | 210 mg/4周,持续28周 | 特泽利尤单抗治疗组的气道黏膜下EOS明显减少,且这一差异在所有基线生物标志物亚组中均可见(中性粒细胞、CD3+T细胞、CD4+T细胞、胰蛋白酶+肥大细胞和糜蛋白酶+肥大细胞) |
| Menzies-Gow等[ | 3期临床试验,12~80岁,哮喘患者 | 210 mg/4周,持续52周 | 特泽利尤单抗治疗后哮喘急性发作年化率明显降低;首次哮喘急性发作的发生时间延长。52周时,支气管舒张剂前FEV1的变化在特泽利尤单抗组更明显,同时,特泽利尤单抗组的ACQ-6、AQLQ(S)+12、ASD评分均较安慰剂组有改善。血液EOS计数、FeNO水平均出现持续下降,总血清IgE也逐步下降 |
| Menzies-Gow等[ | 3期临床试验, 18~80岁 成人及12~17岁的青少 年重度未控制性哮喘 | 210 mg/4周,持续104周 | 特泽利尤单抗治疗在2年内均耐受良好,并在重度未控制性哮喘患者中持续、显著减少哮喘恶化 |
| Lugogo等[ | 4期临床试验,>12岁的重度哮喘患者 | 210 mg/4周,持续48周 | 接受特泽利尤单抗治疗的美国重度哮喘多样化患者群体急性发作显著减少,同时肺功能、哮喘控制、鼻窦炎症状和HRQoL获得临床上有意义的改善 |
| [1] | GBD 2021 Asthma and Allergic Diseases Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of asthma and atopic dermatitis, 1990-2021, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021[J]. Lancet Respir Med,2025,13(5):425-446. |
| [2] |
Huang K, Yang T, Xu J, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of asthma in China: a national cross-sectional study[J]. Lancet,2019,394(10196):407-418.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31147-X |
| [3] | 郭秦星, 刘婉莹, 姚欣. 重症哮喘的治疗进展[J]. 中国临床研究,2023,36(4):487-491. |
| Guo QX, Liu WY, Yao X. Advances in research on treatment of severe asthma[J]. Chin J Clin Res,2023,36(4):487-491. | |
| [4] | 周妍, 张旻. 中国《支气管哮喘防治指南(2024年版)》解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践,2025,24(4):415-422. |
| Zhou Y, Zhang M. Interpretation of Chinese guidelines for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma (2024 edition)[J]. J Diagn Concepts Pract,2025,24(4):415-422. | |
| [5] | Ying S, O’Connor B, Ratoff J, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression is increased in asthmatic airways and correlates with expression of Th2-attracting chemokines and disease severity[J]. J Immunol,2005,174(12):8183-8190. |
| [6] | Hong H, Liao S, Chen F, et al. Role of IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP in triggering united airway diseases toward type 2 inflammation[J]. Allergy,2020,75(11):2794-2804. |
| [7] | Kashyap M, Rochman Y, Spolski R, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is produced by dendritic cells[J]. J Immunol,2011,187(3):1207-1211. |
| [8] | Pattarini L, Trichot C, Bogiatzi S, et al. TSLP-activated dendritic cells induce human T follicular helper cell differentiation through OX40-ligand[J]. J Exp Med,2017,214(5):1529-1546. |
| [9] | Smolinska S, Antolín-Amérigo D, Popescu FD, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), its isoforms and the interplay with the epithelium in allergy and asthma[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2023,24(16):12725. |
| [10] | Huang IH, Chung WH, Wu PC, et al. JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: an updated review[J]. Front Immunol,2022,13:1068260. |
| [11] | Verstraete K, Peelman F, Braun H, et al. Structure and antagonism of the receptor complex mediated by human TSLP in allergy and asthma[J]. Nat Commun,2017,8:14937. |
| [12] | Rochman Y, Kashyap M, Robinson GW, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin-mediated STAT5 phosphorylation via kinases JAK1 and JAK2 reveals a key difference from IL-7-induced signaling[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2010,107(45):19455-19460. |
| [13] | Lu N, Wang YH, Wang YH, et al. TSLP and IL-7 use two different mechanisms to regulate human CD4+ T cell homeostasis[J]. J Exp Med,2009,206(10):2111-2119. |
| [14] | Feng S, Zhang L, Bian XH, et al. Role of the TSLP-DC-OX40L pathway in asthma pathogenesis and airway inflammation in mice[J]. Biochem Cell Biol,2018,96(3):306-316. |
| [15] | Xue M, Xu S, Su L, et al. Surfactant protein-A inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin-mediated T follicular helper cell differentiation and IgE production in asthma[J]. Clin Immunol,2021,231:108822. |
| [16] | Gong Y, Luo L, Li L, et al. Diphenylcyclopropenone plays an effective therapeutic role by up-regulating the TSLP/OX40L/IL-13 pathway in severe alopecia areata[J]. Exp Dermatol,2021,30(2):278-283. |
| [17] | Pelaia C, Pelaia G, Crimi C, et al. Tezepelumab: a potential new biological therapy for severe refractory asthma[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2021,22(9):4369. |
| [18] | Calderon AA, Dimond C, Choy DF, et al. Targeting interleukin-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin pathways for novel pulmonary therapeutics in asthma and COPD[J]. Eur Respir Rev,2023,32(167):220144. |
| [19] | Corren J. New targeted therapies for uncontrolled asthma[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract,2019,7(5):1394-1403. |
| [20] | Zoumot Z, Al Busaidi N, Tashkandi W, et al. Tezepelumab for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Asthma Allergy,2022,15:1665-1679. |
| [21] | Bagnasco D, de Ferrari L, Bondi B, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin and tezepelumab in airway diseases: from physiological role to target therapy[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2024,25(11):5972. |
| [22] | 胡龙兴. Tezepelumab治疗难治性哮喘的疗效及安全性的Meta分析[D]. 赣州: 赣南医科大学, 2025. |
| Hu LX. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in the treatment of refractory asthma[D]. Ganzhou:Gannan Medical University, 2025. | |
| [23] | Yi L, Cheng D, Zhang K, et al. Intelectin contributes to allergen-induced IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP expression and type 2 response in asthma and atopic dermatitis[J]. Mucosal Immunol,2017,10(6):1491-1503. |
| [24] | Hu Y, Dong H, Zou M, et al. TSLP signaling blocking alleviates E-cadherin dysfunction of airway epithelium in a HDM-induced asthma model[J]. Cell Immunol,2017,315:56-63. |
| [25] | Shi L, Leu SW, Xu F, et al. Local blockade of TSLP receptor alleviated allergic disease by regulating airway dendritic cells[J]. Clin Immunol,2008,129(2):202-210. |
| [26] | Zhang F, Huang G, Hu B, et al. A soluble thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) antagonist, TSLPR-immunoglobulin, reduces the severity of allergic disease by regulating pulmonary dendritic cells[J]. Clin Exp Immunol,2011,164(2):256-264. |
| [27] | Chen ZG, Zhang TT, Li HT, et al. Neutralization of TSLP inhibits airway remodeling in a murine model of allergic asthma induced by chronic exposure to house dust mite[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(1):e51268. |
| [28] | Lee HY, Lee HY, Hur J, et al. Blockade of thymic stromal lymphopoietin and CRTH2 attenuates airway inflammation in a murine model of allergic asthma[J]. Korean J Intern Med,2020,35(3):619-629. |
| [29] | Cheng DT, Ma C, Niewoehner J, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor blockade reduces allergic inflammation in a cynomolgus monkey model of asthma[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol,2013,132(2):455-462. |
| [30] | Corren J, Parnes JR, Wang L, et al. Tezepelumab in adults with uncontrolled asthma[J]. N Engl J Med,2017,377(10):936-946. |
| [31] | Diver S, Khalfaoui L, Emson C, et al. Effect of tezepelumab on airway inflammatory cells, remodelling, and hyperresponsiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma (CASCADE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Respir Med,2021,9(11):1299-1312. |
| [32] | Menzies-Gow A, Corren J, Bourdin A, et al. Tezepelumab in adults and adolescents with severe, uncontrolled asthma[J]. N Engl J Med,2021,384(19):1800-1809. |
| [33] | Menzies-Gow A, Wechsler ME, Brightling CE, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of tezepelumab in people with severe, uncontrolled asthma (DESTINATION): a randomised, placebo-controlled extension study[J]. Lancet Respir Med,2023,11(5):425-438. |
| [34] | Lugogo NL, Akuthota P, Sumino K, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tezepelumab in a diverse population of US patients with severe asthma: initial results of the PASSAGE study[J]. Adv Ther,2025,42(7):3334-3353. |
| [35] | Habash M, Guiang H, Mayers I, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tezepelumab in Canada for severe asthma[J]. J Med Econ,2023,26(1):902-914. |
| [36] | 侯誉, 蒋维鑫, 李慧琴, 等. 我国已上市治疗性单克隆抗体药品价格变化及其原因分析[J/OL]. 医药导报, 2016 [2026-02-28]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1293.r.20260111.1811.010. |
| Hou Y, Jiang WX, Li HQ, et al. Analysis of price changes and reasons of therapeutic monoclonal antibody drugs marketed in China[J/OL]. Her Med, 2016 [2026-02-28]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1293.r.20260111.1811.010. | |
| [37] | Gauvreau GM, O’Byrne PM, Boulet LP, et al. Effects of an anti-TSLP antibody on allergen-induced asthmatic responses[J]. N Engl J Med,2014,370(22):2102-2110. |
| [1] | 支楠, 耿介立, 曹雯炜, 宋雅颖, 王刚. 《抗Aβ单克隆抗体临床应用建议(2025版)》解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026, 25(02): 148-156. |
| [2] | 徐泱, 喻敏成. 抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体在肿瘤治疗中的研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(03): 227-235. |
| [3] | 赵辉,孙梦妍,王宇翀,薛春雨. 黑色素瘤抗体治疗研究进展[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2016, 12(6): 381-384. |
| [4] | 高健鹏, 陈雪华, 李明, 李建芳, 瞿颖, 苏丽萍, 陆梅生, 刘炳亚, 朱正纲,. 单克隆抗体MS57-2.1在胃癌生物学中的实验研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2013, 18(02): 150-155. |
| [5] | 阎骅, 沈志祥,. 非霍奇金淋巴瘤靶点治疗及其临床应用前景[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2009, 4(01): 18-21. |
| [6] | 龚英, 汪登斌, 钟高仁,. 对比剂Gd-DTPA-BSA-chTNT的研制及其在乳腺癌裸鼠模型活体MR分子成像中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2007, 6(01): 30-35. |
| [7] | 许凯黎. 肠癌生物靶分子的研究进展[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2003, 8(03): 180-183. |
| [8] | 王红,李稻,李建新,王鸿利. 纤溶酶-α_2-抗纤溶酶复合物单克隆抗体的制备及其应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2002, 1(01): 39-42. |
| [9] | 王川,王怡,苏向前,林保和,许小宝,张梅颖,徐光炜. ~(125)I标记单克隆抗体3H11在胃癌放射免疫导向手术中应用的初步研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2000, 5(03): 163-166. |
| [10] | 胡伟国,郁宝铭,郑民华,王灏,李东华,贺根兴,杨伟宗. 粪便隐血单克隆抗体法在检测结、直肠癌中的评价[J]. 外科理论与实践, 1999, 4(02): 194-5. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
