Construction of sensitivity indicators for perioperative nursing quality in percutaneous coronary intervention

doi:10.16138/j.1673-6087.2025.06.07

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To develop a scientifically reasonable set of sensitivity indicators for perioperative nursing quality in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Domestic and international literature was retrieved, and the Johns Hopkins evidence-based nursing practice model was employed to appraise the literature and grade the evidence. Indicators were screened and integrated to form a preliminary pool of sensitivity indicators for PCI perioperative nursing quality. Based on the theoretical basis of the Donabedian three-dimensional quality model, the Delphi method was utilized for expert consultation to construct the final indicator set. Results The response rates for both rounds of the expert consultation were 100%. The expert authority coefficients were both 0.889. The overall Kendall’ s coefficient of concordance were 0.496 and 0.523, respectively (P < 0.001). The final set of PCI perioperative nursing quality sensitivity indicators comprises 3 first-level, 13 second-level and 36 third-level indicators.Conclusions The developed sensitivity indicators for PCI perioperative nursing quality encompass multiple dimensions, including human resources, management systems, medical specialty training, nursing competency, medication and facility management, health education, preoperative/intraoperative/postoperative management, patient satisfaction, incidence of adverse events, nursing efficiency, and continuity of care. This indicator system can comprehensively measure PCI perioperative nursing quality and serves as a valuable tool for improving the overall standard of PCI perioperative nursing services.

Key words: Percutaneous coronary intervention, Perioperative period, Nursing quality, Quality evaluation, Sensitivity indicators

CLC Number:

R540.5

WU Shengjia, HUANG Sichao, KANG Lei, ZHU Weiyi, ZHA Qinghua, NI Xueping. Construction of sensitivity indicators for perioperative nursing quality in percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice, 2026, 20(06): 469-476.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Sensitivity indicators of nursing quality in the perioperative period of percutaneous coronary intervention($ \stackrel{-}{x} $±s)

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标	重要性（分）
Ⅰ结构指标	Ⅰ-1人力资源	Ⅰ-1-1病区护患比例	4.906±0.225
		Ⅰ-1-2不同年资层次护理人员占比	4.889±0.345
		Ⅰ-1-3不同职称层次护理人员占比	4.904±0.221
	Ⅰ-2管理制度	Ⅰ-2-1核心制度与护理规范掌握率	4.912±0.314
		Ⅰ-2-2护理不良事件处理流程掌握率	4.869±0.479
	Ⅰ-3专科培训	Ⅰ-3-1 PCI相关专科知识掌握率	4.696±0.252
		Ⅰ-3-2专科操作掌握率	4.852±0.233
	Ⅰ-4护理服务能力	Ⅰ-4-1 24 h平均护理时数	4.711±0.227
	Ⅰ-5药品和设施管理	Ⅰ-5-1抢救设备完备率	4.816±0.232
		Ⅰ-5-2监护设备完备率	4.771±0.233
		Ⅰ-5-3药品管理合格率	4.867±0.224
Ⅱ过程指标	Ⅱ-1健康教育	Ⅱ-1-1患者PCI相关健康宣教知晓率	4.956±0.515
	Ⅱ-2专科护理	Ⅱ-2-1 PCI术转运交接正确率	4.956±0.613
	Ⅱ-3术前管理	Ⅱ-3-1术前血管通路准备完成率	4.800±0.513
		Ⅱ-3-2术前检查完善率	4.800±0.513
		Ⅱ-3-3术前胃肠道准备完成率	4.985±0.546
		Ⅱ-3-4术前出血风险评估完成率	4.951±0.505
		Ⅱ-3-5术前桡尺动脉情况评估完成率	4.949±0.519
		Ⅱ-3-6术前急性肾损伤风险评估完成率	4.962±0.611
		Ⅱ-3-8术前双联抗血小板药物给药执行率	5.000±0.000
	Ⅱ-4术中管理	Ⅱ-4-1术中抗凝给药准确率	4.912±0.225
		Ⅱ-4-2术中低体温发生率	4.962±0.214
		Ⅱ-4-3术中血流动力监测合格率	4.824±0.416
		Ⅱ-4-4术中生命体征评估合格率	4.870±0.201
	Ⅱ-5术后管理	Ⅱ-5-1 PCI术后水化落实率	4.900±0.511
		Ⅱ-5-2水化后尿量监测完成率	4.886±0.509
		Ⅱ-5-3术后穿刺部位加压包扎与减压正确率	4.909±0.484
		Ⅱ-5-4运动康复前评估正确率	4.563±0.513
		Ⅱ-5-5术后心脏康复运动执行率	4.952±0.413
		Ⅱ-5-6术后血压监测完成率	4.600±0.496
Ⅲ结果指标	Ⅲ-1患者满意	Ⅲ-1-1患者对护理服务满意度	4.961±0.226
	Ⅲ-2不良事件发生率	Ⅲ-2-1 PCI术后血肿率	4.553±0.503
		Ⅲ-2-2 PCI术后碘造影剂肾病的发生率	4.651±0.484
	Ⅲ-3护理效率及出院延续性护理	Ⅲ-3-1 PCI术患者出院指导合格率	4.953±0.225
		Ⅲ-3-3 PCI术患者出院后准时复查率	4.889±0.343
		Ⅲ-3-4 PCI术患者出院后电话随访率	4.749±0.551

Table 4

References 20

[1]	中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2022概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2023, 38(6):583-612. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2023.06.001
	The Writing Committee of the Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2022: an updated summary[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2023, 38(6):583-612. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2023.06.001
[2]	Doenst T, Thiele H, Haasenritter J, et al. The treatment of coronary artery disease—current status six decades after the first bypass operation[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2022, 119(42):716-723.
[3]	张笑, 赵滨, 李静, 等. 三级综合医院护理质量敏感性指标的构建[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(24):4-8.
	Zhang X, Zhao B, Li J, et al. Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for tertiary general hospitals[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2016, 31(24):4-8.
[4]	Jaam M, Awaisu A, El-Awaisi A, et al. Use of the Delphi technique in pharmacy practice research[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm, 2022, 18(1):2237-2248. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.028
[5]	郝云霞, 李庆印. 急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗护理实践指南的构建[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(1):36-41. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.01.006
	Hao YX, Li QY. Construction of nursing practice guideline for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(1):36-41. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.01.006
[6]	Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 79(2):e21-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006
[7]	中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南（2016）[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(5):382-400.
	Section of Interventional Cardiology of Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association, Specialty Committee on Prevention and Treatment of Thrombosis of Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Chinese guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention (2016)[J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2016, 44(5):382-400.
[8]	陆芸岚, 侯桂华. 新冠肺炎疫情常态化防控下行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗护理管理专家共识（2022年版）[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2023, 32(2):105-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2023.02.001
	Lu YL, Hou GH. Expert consensus on nursing management for patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention under the regular COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control (2022 edition)[J]. J Intervent Radiol, 2023, 32(2):105-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2023.02.001
[9]	李宪伦, 王显, 吴永健, 等. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后中西医结合心脏康复专家共识[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(11):1517-1528.
	Li XL, Wang X, Wu YJ, et al. Expert consensus on integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine-based cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2022, 37(11):1517-1528.
[10]	赵雪燕, 袁晋青. 2019 ARC-HBR经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的高出血风险定义专家共识解读[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(S1):24-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2019.增刊.007
	Zhao XY, Yuan JQ. Interpretation of the 2019 ARC-HBR expert consensus on the definition of high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2019, 34(S1):24-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2019.增刊.007
[11]	陈纪言, 陈韵岱, 韩雅玲, 等. 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后运动康复专家共识[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2016, 24(7):361-369. doi: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2000
	Chen JY, Chen YD, Han YL, et al. Expert consensus on exercise-based rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chin J Intervent Cardiol, 2016, 24(7):361-369. doi: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2000
[12]	复旦大学附属中山医院心内科, 上海市心血管病研究所, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会, 等. 冠状动脉内斑块旋磨术护理中国专家共识[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2020, 28(3):121-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2020.03.001
	Department of Cardiology of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai Cardiovascular Disease Research Institute, Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physicians, et al. Chinese expert consensus on nursing care for rotational atherectomy[J]. Chin J Intervent Cardiol, 2020, 28(3):121-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2020.03.001
[13]	武杰, 杨金超, 刘焱. 心血管介入碘对比剂使用管理护理专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2021, 36(7):625-633. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2021.07.001
	Wu J, Yang JC, Liu Y. Nurse expert consensus on management of iodine contrast media application in cardiovascular intervention[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2021, 36(7):625-633. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2021.07.001
[14]	赵连友, 孙英贤, 李悦, 等. 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后血压管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2022, 30(6):506-513. doi: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2022.06.003
	Zhao LY, Sun YX, Li Y, et al. Chinese expert consensus on blood pressure management after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chin J Hypertens, 2022, 30(6):506-513. doi: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2022.06.003
[15]	熊洁. 心电监护仪监测联合多元化护理对冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后心理状态及心功能的影响[J]. 医疗装备, 2023, 36(19):118-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2023.19.039
	Xiong J. Effects of electrocardiogram monitor combined with diversified nursing on psychological state and cardiac function in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Medical Equipment, 2023, 36(19):118-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2023.19.039
[16]	郭亚芬, 周建伟. 冠心病PCI术后患者疾病接受度现状及影响因素研究[J]. 湖南师范大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 18(2):90-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-016X.2021.02.026
	Guo YF, Zhou JW. Study on acceptance of illness current situation and influencing factors in patients with coronary heart disease after receiving PCI[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University (Medical Science), 2021, 18(2):90-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-016X.2021.02.026
[17]	Zhuo Q, Liang H, Bai Y, et al. Perceptions of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on pre-operative education in China: a qualitative study[J]. Health Expect, 2021, 24(1):121-130. doi: 10.1111/hex.13156
[18]	刘玉玺, 肖俊丽, 殷安雯, 等. 以专科护士为导向的延续康复路径对介入治疗急性心肌梗死患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2022, 28(23):9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2022.23.003
	Liu YX, Xiao JL, Yin AW, et al. Effect of specialized nurse-oriented continuous rehabilitation path in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by interventional therapy[J]. Journal of Qilu Nursing, 2022, 28(23):9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2022.23.003
[19]	周利利, 刘瑞, 卢彦洁, 等. IKAP健康教育模式对心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2024, 30(5):14-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2024.05.004
	Zhou LL, Liu R, Lu YJ, et al. Clinical effects of IKAP health education model on patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention treatment[J]. Journal of Qilu Nursing, 2024, 30(5):14-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2024.05.004
[20]	Yin S, Ou Y, Ting E. Impacts of Omaha System-based continuing care on the medication compliance, quality of life, and prognosis of coronary heart disease patients after PCI[J]. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2022, 37(4):472-480.

纳入文献	文献主题	来源	发表时间（年）	文献类型	文献质量
ACC：美国心脏病学会（American College of Cardiology）；AHA：美国心脏协会（American Heart Association）；SCAI：心血管造影与介入学会（Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention）；ARC-HBR：高出血风险学术研究联合会（Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk）。
郝云霞等^[5]	急诊PCI治疗护理实践指南的构建	中国知网	2019	指南	ⅣA
Lawton等^[6]	2021年 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南	PubMed	2023	指南	ⅣA
中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组^[7]	中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)	中国知网	2016	指南	ⅣB
陆芸岚等^[8]	新冠肺炎疫情常态化防控下行急诊PCI治疗护理管理专家共识	中国知网	2023	专家共识	ⅤB
李宪伦等^[9]	PCI术后中西医结合心脏康复专家共识	中国知网	2022	专家共识	ⅤA
赵雪燕等^[10]	2019 ARC-HBR PCI治疗患者的高出血风险定义专家共识解读	中国知网	2019	专家共识	ⅤA
陈纪言等^[11]	PCI治疗术后运动康复专家共识	中国知网	2016	专家共识	ⅤB
中国介入心脏病学杂志^[12]	冠状动脉内斑块旋磨术护理中国专家共识	中国知网	2020	专家共识	ⅤA
武杰等^[13]	心血管介入碘对比剂使用管理护理专家共识	中国知网	2021	专家共识	ⅤA
赵连友等^[14]	PCI治疗术后血压管理中国专家共识	中国知网	2022	专家共识	ⅤB

组别	重要性
组别	评分	CV
一级指标	4.47～4.71	0.16～0.19
二级指标	3.65～4.82	0.09～0.17
三级指标	2.53～4.98	0.00～0.17

组别	重要性
组别	评分	CV
一级指标	4.53～4.77	0.14～0.17
二级指标	4.48～4.85	0.12～0.19
三级指标	3.23～4.98	0.00～0.19