外科理论与实践 ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (01): 6-11.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2026.01.02

• 述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

造口旁疝微创术式的溯源、争议和选择

巴突尔·艾克木, 李健文(), 乐飞()   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院普外科上海 200025
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-18 出版日期:2026-02-25 发布日期:2026-04-21
  • 通讯作者: 李健文,E-mail: ljw5@yeah.net
    乐飞,E-mail: yue.fei@163.com
  • 作者简介:第一联系人:

    巴突尔·艾克木负责文献查阅、撰稿和修改文章;李健文负责全面指导、总结、审查和修订;乐飞负责翻译、审校和提供意见。

Tracing the origin, debates, and option of minimally invasive surgical techniques for parastomal hernia

BATUER Aikemu, LI Jianwen(), YUE Fei()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2026-01-18 Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-04-21

摘要:

腹腔镜治疗造口旁疝最先应用Sugarbaker术式,因肠管卡压等潜在并发症而产生Keyhole术式,三明治技术和杂交技术也有所报道。开展初期,全腹腔镜Keyhole术式应用最多,其局限性尤其是高复发率逐渐凸显。三明治技术尽管有效,但因“补片材料过多”仅有限使用。由杂交技术而来的腹腔镜造口原位重建(Lap-re-Do)方法联合Keyhole可优化术式。在开展中期逐渐完善技术操作体系,临床应用较普遍。尽管如此,Keyhole补片开孔的固有缺陷,使总体疗效提升有限。开展中后期,受指南“弱”推荐,Sugarbaker术式重新回归主流,微创腹膜外Sugarbaker修补等新兴技术也应运而生,但最初限制Sugarbaker术式的核心问题仍存在。Lap-re-Do因未与Sugarbaker构成术式优化,且存在感染、造口相关并发症等潜在风险,开展比例下降。造口旁疝修补属于“改善性”(生活质量为导向)治疗,应在总体疗效相近的情况下,选择最简单的手术方法。目前造口旁疝尚无金标准术式,每种微创术式均存在特有优势和固有缺陷。常规情况下,建议首选全腹腔镜Sugarbaker术式,复杂疝如有造口重建指征,可采用Lap-re-Do联合Keyhole或Sugarbaker术式。

关键词: 造口旁疝, 腹腔镜, Keyhole术式, Sugarbaker术式, 造口原位重建, 杂交术式

Abstract:

Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia was initially performed with the Sugarbaker technique. Owing to potential complications such as bowel incarceration, the Keyhole technique was subsequently developed, followed by reports of the Sandwich technique and various hybrid approaches. In the early stage, the totally laparoscopic Keyhole technique was most widely applied; however, its limitations, particularly the high recurrence rate, became increasingly evident. Although the Sandwich technique demonstrated favorable efficacy, its application remained limited because of excessive prosthetic material. The laparoscopic redo of the stoma at the original site (Lap-re-Do), derived from hybrid technique and combined with the Keyhole technique, offered procedural optimization. During the intermediate stage, its technical workflow was progressively refined and widely adopted in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the inherent defect of the Keyhole technique, namely the mesh aperture, constrained further improvement in overall outcomes. In the mid-to-late stage, following “weak” recommendations in clinical guidelines, the Sugarbaker technique regained prominence, accompanied by the emergence of novel approaches such as minimally invasive extraperitoneal Sugarbaker repair. However, the fundamental concerns that initially limited the Sugarbaker technique persist. The application of Lap-re-Do declined due to the lack of synergistic optimization with the Sugarbaker technique and the potential risks of infection and stoma-related complications. Parastomal hernia repair is essentially a quality-of-life-oriented intervention. When overall efficacy is comparable, the simplest surgical approach should be preferred. At present, no gold-standard technique exists for parastomal hernia repair, and each minimally invasive method has distinct advantages and inherent limitations. Under routine circumstances, a totally laparoscopic Sugarbaker technique is recommended as the preferred option. For complex hernias with indications for stoma reconstruction, Lap-re-Do combined with either the Keyhole or Sugarbaker technique may be considered.

Key words: Parastomal hernia, Laparoscopy, Keyhole technique, Sugarbaker technique, Laparoscopic redo of the stoma at the original site (Lap-re-Do), Hybrid technique

中图分类号: