外科理论与实践 ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (02): 121-128.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2026.02.05

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜胃袖状切除联合双通道术与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术治疗超级肥胖的近期疗效对比研究

朱玉喜1,2, 倪良晨1,2, 王键1,2, 洪健1,2, 朱孝成1,2(), 姚立彬1,2()   

  1. 1 徐州医科大学附属医院减重代谢外科, 江苏 徐州 221006
    2 徐州医科大学国际肥胖及代谢病中心, 江苏 徐州 221004
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-05 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-06-23
  • 通讯作者: 姚立彬,E-mail: yaolibin_123@126.com; 朱孝成,E-mail: zhuxccf@163.com
  • 作者简介:作者贡献/Authors’ contributions

    朱玉喜、倪良晨、王键负责资料的收集、数据分析和撰写;王键、洪健负责整理数据和汇总;朱孝成、姚立彬负责指导、审查和修订。所有作者均阅读并确认最终稿。

  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高水平医院建设项目徐州医科大学附属医院高水平医院建设专项(GSPJS202405);徐州医科大学附属医院高层次科研项目培育计划(重点项目)(PYJH2025202)

Short-term efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of super obesity

ZHU Yuxi1,2, NI Liangchen1,2, WANG Jian1,2, HONG Jian1,2, ZHU Xiaocheng1,2(), YAO Libin1,2()   

  1. 1 Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu Xuzhou 221006, China
    2 International Center for Obesity and Metabolic Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu Xuzhou 221004, China
  • Received:2025-05-05 Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-06-23

摘要:

目的:比较腹腔镜胃袖状切除联合双通道术(LSG-TB)与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术(LSG)治疗超级肥胖病人的近期疗效及安全性。方法:回顾分析113例超级肥胖病人(LSG组75例,LSG-TB组38例)术后12个月的减重、代谢改善、营养变化及并发症发生情况。结果:LSG-TB组术后12个月总体重减少百分比(TWL%)和多余体重减少百分比(EWL%)显著高于LSG组(40.0%比36.6%,73.4%比66.2%,P<0.05)。两组血糖控制相当,但LSG-TB组总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)及尿酸(UA)下降更明显(P<0.05)。胃食管反流病(GERD)缓解率在LSG-TB组亦更高(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率低,营养指标整体稳定。结论:LSG-TB在超级肥胖病人中展现出更优的近期减重与代谢改善效果,且安全性良好,与LSG相当,具有一定的临床应用价值。

关键词: 超级肥胖, 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术, 双通道术, 减重手术, 代谢改善

Abstract:

Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with transit bipartition (TB) versus LSG in super obese patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 113 super obese patients (LSG 75, LSG-TB 38 cases), evaluating weight loss, metabolic outcomes, nutritional indicators, and complications over 12 months. Results At 12 months, LSG-TB showed significantly higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) than LSG (40.0% vs. 36.6%, 73.4% vs. 66.2%, P<0.05). Both groups achieved similar glycemic control, while total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and uric acid (UA) levels decreased more in the LSG-TB group (P<0.05). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remission was significantly better with LSG-TB (P<0.05). Postoperative complication rates were low in both groups, with stable nutritional status. Conclusions LSG-TB demonstrates superior short-term weight loss and metabolic benefits in super obese patients, with comparable safety to LSG, supporting its clinical value.

Key words: Super obesity, Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), Transit bipartition(TB), Bariatric surgery, Metabolic benefit

中图分类号: