论著

三种方式引导植入静脉输液港的比较

展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院放射介入科,上海 200025

收稿日期: 2018-05-16

  网络出版日期: 2020-07-25

Comparison of three guidance placement of implantable venous access port

Expand
  • Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received date: 2018-05-16

  Online published: 2020-07-25

摘要

目的 比较DSA、CT、B超3种方式引导下植入式静脉输液港的应用。方法 回顾性分析我院2017年4月至2018年2月行颈内静脉输液港植入共82例病人的临床资料,其中DSA引导组30例,CT引导组22例,B超引导组30例,比较其手术时间、辐射剂量及并发症发生情况。结果 3组病人经颈内静脉植入输液港的穿刺成功率均为100%。CT引导组手术时间显著长于其他两组(P<0.05)。该组接受的辐射剂量也显著高于其他两组(P<0.05)。DSA引导组各有1例出现气胸、血胸和颈部牵拉感。CT引导组1例出现颈部牵拉感。B超引导组中各有1例出现颈部牵拉感和颈部穿刺点导管折角。3组在并发症发生方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。3组无1例出现感染、气体栓塞、心律失常等严重并发症。结论 DSA引导下行颈内静脉PORT植入,其操作便利、耗时短、辐射剂量少,但盲视下行颈内静脉穿刺存在一定风险。

本文引用格式

刘晶晶, 黄蔚, 吴志远, 王庆兵, 丁晓毅, 王忠敏, 刘钦, 王子寅 . 三种方式引导植入静脉输液港的比较[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018 , 23(04) : 369 -373 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2018.04.019

Abstract

Objective To compare digital subtraction arteriography(DSA) guidance, CT guidance and B-ultrasound guidance of implantable venous access port placement. Methods The clinical data of 82 cases with implanted internal jugular venous access port including 30 cases in DSA-guided group, 22 cases in CT-guided group and 30 case in B-ultrasound-guided group from April 2017 to February 2018 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Operation time, radiation dose and complications were compared. Results The placement of port was successful in all the patients. The operation time of cases in CT-guided group was significantly longer and the radiation dose higher than in the other two groups (P<0.05). Several complications were observed in three groups. Pneumothorax in one case, hemothorax in one case and pulling sensation of neck in one case were found respectively in DSA-guided group. Only pulling sensation of neck discomfort was found in one case of CT-guided group. The pulling sensation of neck was present in one case and the catheter with angle formed in another case in B-ultrasound guided group. There was no significant difference statistically in complications among three groups(P>0.05). Local and systemic infection, gas embolism, arrhythmia and other serious complications were all not seen in three groups. Conclusions The placement of an internal jugular vein port through DSA guidance is convenient, time-saving and low radiation exposure, and there is risk of internal jugular vein puncture without guiding.

参考文献

[1] Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, et al.Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment[J]. Surgery,1982, 92(4):706-712.
[2] Keulers AR, Kiesow L, Mahnken AH.Port implantation in patients with severe thrombocytopenia is safe with interventional radiology[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2018,41(1):80-86.
[3] Vescia S, Baumgärtner AK, Jacobs VR, et al.Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence[J]. Ann Oncol,2008,19(1):9-15.
[4] 田娟, 袁敏, 邹洪福. 同步助力泵的研制及其在PICC导管堵塞再通术中的临床应用[J]. 实用医学杂志,20l3,29(5):823-826.
[5] Voog E, Campion L, du Rusquec P, et al. Totally implantable venous access ports: a prospective long-term study of early and late complications in adult patients with cancer[J]. Support Care Cancer,2018,26(1):81-89.
[6] Dede D, Akmangit I, Yildirim ZN, et al.Ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided insertion of chest ports[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2008,34(12):1340-1343.
[7] 许立超, 李文涛, 陆箴琦. 全程管理是中心静脉通路安全保障[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2017,26(8):673-675.
[8] Tippit D, Siegel E, Ochoa D, et al.Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis in patients with breast cancer with chest versus arm central venous port catheters[J]. Breast Cancer(Auckl),2018,12:1-10.
[9] 胡育斌, 林海澜, 郝明志, 等. DSA引导下植入式静脉输液港在恶性肿瘤患者中的应用[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学,2016,13(8):455-459.
[10] 张俊, 燕敏, 曹伟新. 周围静脉营养的临床应用[J]. 外科理论与实践,2004,9(5):436-438.
[11] 仇晓霞, 金光鑫, 郭艳, 等. 超声导引下上臂完全植入式输液港植入临床应用[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2017,26(8):689-694.
[12] Jonczyk M, Gebauer B, Rotzinger R, et al.Totally implantable central venous port catheters: radiation exposure as a function of puncture site and operator expe-rience[J]. In Vivo,2018,32(1):179-184.
[13] Zaghal A, Khalife M, Mukherji D, et al.Update on totally implantable venous access devicess[J]. Surg Oncol,2012, 21(3):207-215.
[14] Wu SY, Ling Q, Cao LH, et al.Real-time two-dimensional ultrasound guidance for central venous cannulation: a meta-analysis[J]. Anesthesiology,2013,118(2):361-375.
[15] Fragou M, Gravvanis A, Dimitriou V, et al.Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study[J]. Crit Care Med,2011,39(7):1607-1612.
[16] 胡明, 褚珺, 陈其民, 等. 婴幼儿超声辅助下颈内静脉穿刺植入完全植入式静脉输液港评价[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2017,26(8):684-687.
[17] Biffi R, Toro A, Pozzi S, et al.Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved?[J]. Support Care Cancer,2014,22(6):1705-1714.
[18] Lamperti M, Bodenham AR, Pittiruti M, et al.International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access[J]. Intensive Care Med,2012,38(7):1105-1117.
[19] Dede D, Akmangit I, Yildirim ZN, et al.Ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided insertion of chest ports[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2008,34(12):1340-1343.
[20] Labourey JL, Lacroix P, Gent D, et al.Thrombotic complications of implanted central venous access divices:prospetive evaluation[J]. Bull Cancer,2004,91(5):431-436.
文章导航

/