论著

肠段切除手术治疗卵巢癌肠道转移临床分析(附65例报告)

  • 唐晓健 ,
  • 冯炜炜
展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院妇产科上海 200025
作者贡献/Authors’ contributions

唐晓健负责资料收集、研究设计、整理统计数据和撰写;冯炜炜负责指导、审查和修订。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿。

冯炜炜, E-mail: fww12066@rjh.com.cn

收稿日期: 2026-02-28

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-23

Clinical analysis of bowel resection surgery for intestinal metastasis of ovarian cancer: a report of 65 cases

  • TANG Xiaojian ,
  • FENG Weiwei
Expand
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received date: 2026-02-28

  Online published: 2026-06-23

摘要

目的:探讨肠壁侵犯深度对接受肠段切除术的卵巢癌肠道转移病人预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析2013年10月至2025年3月于上海瑞金医院行肿瘤细胞减灭术联合肠段切除术的65例上皮性卵巢癌病人的临床病理资料。根据肠壁侵犯深度分为浆膜/肌层侵犯组(47例)和黏膜/黏膜下层侵犯组(18例),比较两组临床病理特征及无进展生存期(PFS)的差异。结果:黏膜/黏膜下层侵犯组中位PFS显著长于浆膜/肌层侵犯组(51.6个月比27.2个月,P=0.014)。与浆膜/肌层侵犯组相比,黏膜/黏膜下层侵犯组初诊时CA125较低(300.5 U/mL比1 050.0 U/mL,P=0.034),术前影像学肠道转移灶检出率较高(100%比48.9%,P<0.001),初诊时合并大腹水比例较低(11.1% 比48.9%,P=0.005),术中腹膜癌指数(PCI)较低(8.7±4.6 比13.4±6.5,P=0.007)。两组在手术相关指标及围术期并发症方面的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:对于接受肠段切除术的卵巢癌肠道转移病人,肠壁侵犯深度与预后密切相关。侵犯至黏膜/黏膜下层者预后较好,其肿瘤的盆腹腔种植转移能力相对较弱。故术前精准评估肠壁侵犯深度有助于优化手术策略。

本文引用格式

唐晓健 , 冯炜炜 . 肠段切除手术治疗卵巢癌肠道转移临床分析(附65例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2026 , 31(02) : 144 -148 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2026.02.08

Abstract

Objective To investigate the impact of depth of bowel wall invasion on clinical characteristics and prognosis in ovarian cancer patients with intestinal metastasis undergoing bowel resection. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreductive surgery combined with bowel resection at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from October 2013 to March 2025. Patients were divided into two groups according to the depth of bowel wall invasion: the serosa/muscularis invasion group (n=47) and the mucosa/submucosa invasion group (n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups. Results The median PFS was significantly longer in the mucosa/submucosa invasion group than in the serosa/muscularis invasion group (51.6 months vs. 27.2 months, P=0.014). Compared with the serosa/muscularis invasion group, the mucosa/submucosa invasion group had lower serum CA125 levels at initial diagnosis (300.5 U/mL vs. 1 050.0 U/mL, P=0.034), a higher rate of preoperative imaging detection of intestinal metastasis (100% vs. 48.9%, P<0.001), a lower proportion of patients with massive ascites at initial diagnosis (11.1% vs. 48.9%, P=0.005), and the intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was also lower (8.7±4.6 vs. 13.4±6.5, P=0.007). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of surgery-related indicators and perioperative complications (all P>0.05). Conclusions In patients with ovarian cancer intestinal metastasis undergoing bowel resection, depth of bowel wall invasion is closely associated with prognosis. Those with invasion reaching the mucosa/submucosa have better prognosis and a relatively weak ability for abdominopelvic seeding. Thus, precise preoperative assessment of invasion depth may help optimize surgical strategies.

参考文献

[1] SCOTT C L, BANERJEE S, JOLY F, et al. Ovarian cancer[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2026,12:10.
[2] SIEGEL R L, KRATZER T B, WAGLE N S, et al. Cancer statistics, 2026[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2026, 76(1):e70043.
[3] CARUSO G, WEROH A S J, CLIBY W. Surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer[J]. JAMA, 2025, 334(14):1278-1291.
[4] CHANG S J, BRISTOW R E, CHI D S, et al. Role of aggressive surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 26(4):336-342.
[5] SEHOULI J, GRABOWSKI J P. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer[J]. Cancer, 2019, 125(suppl 24):4598-4601.
[6] VITO ANDREA C, UCCELLA S, SOZZI G, et al. Primary site disease and recurrence location in ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary debulking surgery vs. interval debulking surgery[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47(5):1075-1082.
[7] 孔聪聪. 卵巢恶性肿瘤肠道转移相关处理[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2018, 10(9):20-23.
  KONG C C. Management of intestinal metastases in ovarian malignancies[J]. Chin J Fam Plann Gynecotokology, 2018, 10(9):20-23.
[8] 张师前, 智绪亭, 刘乃富, 等. 卵巢癌肠道转移64例临床分析[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2006, 9(2):110-112.
  ZHANG S Q, ZHI X T, LIU N F, et al. Intestinal metastasis of ovarian cancer: clinical analysis of 64 cases[J]. Chin J Curr Adv Gen Surg, 2006, 9(2):110-112.
[9] PLOTTI F, MONTERA R, ALOISI A, et al. Total rectosigmoidectomy versus partial rectal resection in primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, 42(3):383-390.
[10] IMTERAT M, GEBERS G, HEITZ F, et al. Low anterior resection syndrome and its impact on quality of life of ovarian carcinoma patients: a prospective longitudinal study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2023,178:96-101.
[11] YE S, WANG Y, CHEN L, et al. The surgical outcomes and perioperative complications of bowel resection as part of debulking surgery of advanced ovarian cancer patients[J]. BMC Surg, 2022, 22(1):81.
[12] MUALLEM M Z, SEHOULI J, RICHTER R, et al. Pre-operative serum CA125, peritoneal cancer index and intra-operative mapping score as predictors of surgical results in primary epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020, 30(1):62-66.
[13] QUAN Q, ZHOU S, LIU Y, et al. Relationship between ascites volume and clinical outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2021, 47(4):1527-1535.
[14] LóPEZ-HERNáNDEZ F J, GONZáLEZ-GIL A, TORROBA A, et al. Peritoneal cancer index in ovarian cancer: what does the surgeon really see?[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2025, 27(11):4185-4191.
文章导航

/