组织工程与重建外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 283-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

互助支持干预对乳腺癌改良根治术后假体重建患者家庭关怀及社会支持水平的影响

  

  • 出版日期:2025-06-02 发布日期:2025-07-01

Influence of mutual support intervention on the level of family care and social support in patients with prosthesis reconstruction after modified radical breast surgery

  • Online:2025-06-02 Published:2025-07-01

摘要:  目的 探讨互助支持干预对乳腺癌改良根治术后假体重建患者家庭关怀及社会支持水平的影响。方法 纳 入2021年1月至2022年6月收治的乳腺癌改良根治术后假体重建患者共160例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(80例) 和研究组(80例),分别给予常规健康宣教干预和互助支持干预。比较两组术后乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表评分、家 庭关怀度指数问卷评分及领悟社会支持量表评分。结果 研究组术后 1、3、6个月症状维度评分显著低于对照组(P< 0.05),功能维度评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05);同时,研究组术后 3、6个月以上评分均显著优于术后 1个月(P<0.05)。 研究组术后1、3、6个月家庭关怀度指数问卷评分和领悟社会支持量表评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);同时研究组术 后3、6个月以上评分均显著高于术后1个月(P<0.05)。结论 互助支持干预用于乳腺癌改良根治术后假体重建患者可 有效提高生活质量,改善家庭关怀状态,并有助于增强社会支持水平。

关键词: 互助支持干预, &emsp, 乳腺癌, &emsp, 手术, &emsp, 假体重建, &emsp, 家庭关怀, &emsp, 社会支持

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence of mutual support intervention on the level of family care and social support in patients with prosthesis reconstruction after modified radical breast surgery. Methods From January 2021 to June 2022, 160 patients with prosthesis reconstruction after modified radical breast surgery were prospectively selected. Patients were divided into control group (80 cases) and study group (80 cases) by random number table method, and were given routine health education intervention and mutual support intervention respectively. The scores of quality of life measurement scale, family caring index questionnaire and perceptive social support scale were compared between the two groups. Results  Symptom dimension scores of the study group at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery were significantly lower than those of the control group( P<0.05). The functional scores of the study group at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than those of the control group( P<0.05). At the same time, the scores of the study group at 3 and 6 months after surgery were significantly better than those at 1 month after surgery (P<0.05). The family care index questionnaire score and perceptive social support scale score of the study group at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than those of the control group( P<0.05). At the same time, the scores of the study group at 3 and 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than those at 1 month after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusion Mutual support intervention can effectively improve the quality of life, improve the state of family care and enhance the level of social support for patients with prosthesis reconstruction after modified radical breast surgery. 

Key words: Mutual support intervention, &emsp, Breast cancer, &emsp, Surgery, &emsp, Prosthesis reconstruction, &emsp, Family care, &emsp, Social support