组织工程与重建外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 571-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

胸廓内动脉肋间穿支皮瓣在胸前创面修复中的应用

  

  • 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2025-12-30

Application of internal mammary artery perforator flap in anterior chest wall reconstruction

  • Online:2025-12-25 Published:2025-12-30

摘要:

目的 探讨应用胸廓内动脉肋间穿支(Internal mammary artery perforator,IMAP)皮瓣修复胸前区创面的效果。

方法 回顾性分析 2021 年 1 月至 2024 年 9 月,应用 IMAP 皮瓣修复胸前区创面的 16 例患者。致伤原因包括肿瘤切除(4 例)、瘢痕疙瘩切除(9 例)和溃疡(3 例)。患者术前均接受手持多普勒超声检查和数字减影血管造影(Digital subtraction angiography,DSA)或计算机断层扫描血管成像(Computed tomography angiography,CTA)检查,观察分析IMA各穿支位置和优势穿支,为穿支选择和皮瓣设计提供参考。对于预期创面较大,供瓣区无法直接拉拢缝合的病例,行供瓣区一期扩张术。本组病例采用IMAP螺旋桨皮瓣,供瓣区均直接拉拢缝合。瘢痕疙瘩患者术后常规进行放疗及其他抗瘢痕治疗。结果 本组患者应用IMAP1皮瓣2例,IMAP2皮瓣12例,IMAP3皮瓣2例,其中3例接受了扩张器植入术,二期手术完成皮瓣移植。所有皮瓣均完全成活,供瓣区切口愈合好。患者术后随访6个月至2年,未见肿瘤与瘢痕疙瘩复发。

结论 IMAP皮瓣是修复胸前区创面的良好选择。术前多普勒超声、DSA和CTA检查,对明确IMA穿支位置、选择优势穿支、个体化设计皮瓣有很好的指导意义。

关键词:

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical application of internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) propeller flap in
the repairing of anterior chest wall wounds. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 16 cases who underwent the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap surgery for chest wall defect reconstruction in our department between January 2021 and September 2024. Etiologies included tumor resection (4 cases), keloid excision (9 cases), and ulceration (3 cases). All patients underwent preoperative handheld Doppler ultrasound along with either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) to identify the locations of IMA perforators and determine the dominant perforator, thereby guiding perforator selection and flap design. For cases with anticipated large defects where the donor site could not be closed directly, primary tissue expansion was performed at the donor site. IMAP propeller flaps were utilized in all cases, with all donor sites successfully closed directly by layered suture. Patients with keloids received routine postoperative radiotherapy and additional anti-scarring therapy. Results In this series, the IMAP1 flap was utilized in 2 cases, the IMAP2 flap in 12 cases, and the IMAP3 flap in 2 cases. Of these,3 patients underwent tissue expander implantation, with flap transfer completed in a second-stage procedure. All flaps survived completely, and the donor site incisions healed well. Patients were followed up for 6 months to 2 years, with no bserved recurrence of tumors or keloids. Conclusion IMAP flap is a promising option for reconstructing chest wall defects. Preoperative Doppler ultrasound, DSA, and CTA provide valuable guidance for identifying IMA perforator locations, selecting the dominant perforator, and planning individualized flap design.

Key words: