目的 比较两种耳再造方法,即保留颞浅筋膜的扩张器法与耳后筋膜瓣直接埋置法的临床效果。

方法 回顾性分析118例小耳畸形患者的临床资料,实验组(n=105)采用保留颞浅筋膜的扩张器法分三期行耳再造,对照组(n=13)选择耳后筋膜瓣直接埋置法分二期行耳再造术。术后评估满意度、并发症发生率、手术效果。

结果 两组的术后满意度、并发症发生率、手术效果均无显著差异(P>0.05),但实验组的术后瘢痕发生率明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论 保留颞浅筋膜的扩张器法三期耳再造术后效果优良,瘢痕不明显,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To compare the clinical effects of the auricular reconstruction between the dilator method retaining the superficial temporal fascia and the posterior ear fascial flap method .

Methods From January 2010 to January 2019, the clinical data of 118 patients with microtia was retrospectively analyzed and the patients were divided into experimental group (n=105) and control group (n=13) according to the different operation method. In the experimental group, three-stage auricular reconstruction technique retaining the superficial temporal fascia was performed. In the control group, the two-stage ear reconstruction using the postauricular fascial flap was performed. The patients were followed regularly after the surgery, and the surgical effect, satisfaction rate, incidence of complications of the two groups were evaluated.

Results Statistical analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in terms of postoperative satisfaction, postoperative complication rate of skin problems and surgical effect (P>0.05), but the incidence of postoperative scar was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion The three-stage auricular reconstruction surgery with retained superficial temporal fascia shows good postoperative effect, and the scar is not obvious, which is worthy of clinical application.