Commentary

Osteoinductive intramedullary implant as an adjunctive therapy for bone transport: A promising approach to accelerate bone defect healing

  • Yuejun Lin a, b ,
  • Jiaming Yang a, b ,
  • Gang Li , a, b, c, *
Expand
  • a Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
  • b Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
  • c The CUHK-ACC Space Medicine Centre on Health Maintenance of Musculoskeletal System, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, PR China
* Room 74038, 5F, Lui Chee Woo Clinical Science Building, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, NT, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, PR China. E-mail address: (G. Li).

Received date: 2023-11-01

  Accepted date: 2023-11-02

  Online published: 2023-11-04

Abstract

A recent study published in Nature Communications presents a unique approach using an osteoinductive intramedullary (IM) implant as an adjunctive therapy for bone transport distraction osteogenesis. The study demonstrates that this innovative technique achieves early bony bridging, eliminates pin tract infections, and prevents docking site non-union, offering significant potential for the treatment of large bone defects. The study also highlights an additive effect of the osteoinductive IM implant on distraction osteogenesis for managing bone defect.

Cite this article

Yuejun Lin , Jiaming Yang , Gang Li . Osteoinductive intramedullary implant as an adjunctive therapy for bone transport: A promising approach to accelerate bone defect healing[J]. Mechanobiology in Medicine, 2023 , 1(2) : 100030 -3 . DOI: 10.1016/j.mbm.2023.100030

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has become a successful surgical method for endogenous tissue regeneration, particularly in the treatment of large bone defects [1], non-union [2], infection [3], and limb deformities [4]. Current DO techniques can be categorized into acute bone shortening and subsequent lengthening and bone transport, both of which rely on gradual distraction with use of external fixation to form new bone in the distraction gap [5,6]. These techniques of distraction osteogenesis have three distinct phases of treatment: latency, distraction and consolidation. Bone transport is more frequently used because of its advantages in maintaining limb length without causing soft tissue contraction [7]. Despite many successful evidences, prolonged consolidation, docking site nonunion, and pin tract infection remain challenging complications in bone transport technique [8].
As early as 1960s′, Dr. Wasserstein started to combine an intramedullary (IM) metallic nail, structural allograft and external frame to accelerate bone healing for patients of limb discrepancies [9]. Later, the use of IM nails has been used in conjunction with an external fixator or inserted after lengthening has been achieved, to reduce fixator time and prevent regenerate deformity [10]. Since 2000s’, implant innovation has led to the production of flexible intramedullary nails to avoid the use of external fixator [11]. Our recent study published in Biomaterials reported that a biodegradable magnesium IM nail significantly promoted bone consolidation in a rat femoral DO model [12]. However, the functionality of a biodegradable IM nail with osteoinductive properties in bone transport remains a subject of inquiry.
Recently, Lin and coauthors innovatively developed an osteoinductive, biodegradable IM implant using a hybrid tissue engineering construct (HyTEC) technique as an adjunctive therapy for bone transport [13] (Fig. 1). The implant was coated with a controlled thickness of hydrogel containing bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) for sustained release. The researchers investigated the efficacy of the implant in experimental models and compared it to standard treatments. There are four key findings as follows:
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the osteoinductive intramedullary (IM) implant as an adjunctive therapy for bone transport distraction osteogenesis. The diagram illustrates the process of femoral bone transport over the osteoinductive IM implant, wherein the sustained release of BMP-2 significantly promotes bone formation at both the regenerate and docking sites. Additionally, it enhances the osseointegration of the fixative pins, thereby preventing docking site nonunion and pin tract infection.
First, the osteoinductive and biodegradable IM implant was enabled by a newly developed hybrid tissue engineering construct (HyTEC) technique, which can coat the substrate with a controlled thickness of hydrogel containing biological substances such as cells or proteins while retaining porous structure. In this study, the authors fabricated a bioactive IM nail for sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) for this indication. To achieve a prolonged release of BMP-2, the authors applied additional PCL coatings onto the IM implant. Results showed that the amount of released BMP-2 after 28 days reduced from 84 ​% in the original IM implant to 62 ​% or 24 ​% when coated with one or three layers of PCL, respectively.
Second, the authors established a clinically relevant rat bone transport model which showed slow consolidation in the regenerate site and high non-union at the docking site. To demonstrate the translational potential of the HyTEC technique, the authors further established a preclinical sheep bone transport model using circumferential fixators as a proof-of-concept study. Distraction over the IM implant was successfully performed using the same protocol as that applied in the rat model, indicating the translational relevance of this HyTEC technique. In addition, the bioactive implant devices exhibited remarkable outcomes, with 100 ​% docking site union at as early as post-operation day 34 (POD 34), early weight-bearing recovery at POD 55, and no pin tract infections. In contrast, the surgical control and other treatment groups experienced high rates of docking site non-union, lack of weight-bearing capability, and pin tract infections.
Fourth, microarray data revealed remarkable elevations in the expression of osteoblast/osteocyte markers and chondrocyte markers within the regenerate on POD3, indicating that tensile strain actively promotes early-phase endochondral ossification. Conversely, the docking site exhibited significantly lower expression levels of these markers due to the absence of tensile strain and the presence of compression. This underscores the crucial role of tensile strain in stimulating bone regeneration, potentially involving mechanosensing and mechanotransduction signaling pathways within bone cells [14,15]. Additionally, a combination of tensile strain and eluting BMP-2 stimulated the expression of markers associated with bone formation, resulting in accelerated bone regeneration (Fig. 1).
Overall, the study highlights the potential of the osteoinductive IM implant as an adjunctive treatment strategy to bone transport distraction osteogenesis for managing bone defects. By accelerating bone regeneration and minimizing complications, this HyTEC technique represents a promising solution for managing bone defects. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to fully explore the translational potential and broader applicability of this innovative approach.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172430), University Grants Committee, Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (14113723, 14108720, 14121721, 14202920, N_CUHK472/22, C7030-18G, T13-402/17-N and AoE/M-402/20), Health Medical Research Fund (HMRF) Hong Kong (17180831, 08190416 and 09203436). This study also received support from the research funds from Health@InnoHK program launched by Innovation Technology Commission of the Hong Kong SAR, PR China.
[1]
M. Chaddha, D. Gulati, A.P. Singh, A.P. Singh, L. Maini, Management of massive posttraumatic bone defects in the lower limb with the Ilizarov technique, Acta Orthop. Belg. 76 (6) (2010) 811-820.

[2]
S. Patil, R. Montgomery, Management of complex tibial and femoral nonunion using the Ilizarov technique, and its cost implications, J. Bone Joint Surg. British 88-B (7) (2006) 928-932.

[3]
M. McNally, J. Ferguson, R. Kugan, D. Stubbs, Ilizarov treatment protocols in the management of infected nonunion of the Tibia, J. Orthop. Trauma 31 (2017).

[4]
H.J. Oostenbroek, R. Brand, P.M. van Roermund, R.M. van Castelein, Paediatric lower limb deformity correction using the Ilizarov technique: a statistical analysis of factors affecting the complication rate, J. Pediatr. Orthop. B 23 (1)(2014).

[5]
L-c Kong, H.A. Li, Q-l Kang, G. Li, An update to the advances in understanding distraction histogenesis: from biological mechanisms to novel clinical applications, J. Orthop. Transl. 25 (2020) 3-10.

[6]
Y. Li, Q. Pan, J. Xu, X. He, H.A. Li, D.A. Oldridge, et al., Overview of methods for enhancing bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis: potential roles of biometals, J. Orthop. Transl. 27 (2021) 110-118.

[7]
D. Paley, D.C. Maar, Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects, J. Orthop. Trauma 14 (2) (2000) 76-85.

[8]
C. Iacobellis, A. Berizzi, R. Aldegheri, Bone transport using the Ilizarov method: a review of complications in 100 consecutive cases, Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 5 (1) (2010) 17-22.

[9]
F. Shapiro, Chapter 8 - lower extremity length discrepancies, in: F. Shapiro (Ed.), Pediatric Orthopedic Deformities, Academic Press, San Diego, 2001, pp. 606-732.

[10]
D. Gulabi, M. Erdem, G.S. Cecen, C.C. Avci, N. Saglam, F. Saglam, Ilizarov fixator combined with an intramedullary nail for tibial nonunions with bone loss: is it effective? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 472 (12) (2014) 3892-3901.

[11]
D. Popkov, A. Popkov, T. Haumont, P. Journeau, P. Lascombes, Flexible intramedullary nail use in limb lengthening, J. Pediatr. Orthop. 30 (8) (2010) 910-918.

[12]
Li Ye J. Xu J. Mi X. He Q. Pan L. Zheng, et al., Biodegradable magnesium combined with distraction osteogenesis synergistically stimulates bone tissue regeneration via CGRP-FAK-VEGF signaling axis, Biomaterials 275 (2021) 120984.

[13]
S. Lin, H. Maekawa, S. Moeinzadeh, E. Lui, H.V. Alizadeh, J. Li, et al., An osteoinductive and biodegradable intramedullary implant accelerates bone healing and mitigates complications of bone transport in male rats, Nat. Commun. 14 (1) (2023) 4455.

[14]
Y.-X. Qin, J. Zhao, Mechanobiology in cellular, molecular, and tissue adaptation, Mechanobiol. Med. 1 (2) (2023) 100022.

[15]
V. Panzetta, C. De Clemente, M. Russo, S. Fusco, P.A. Netti, Insight to motor clutch model for sensing of ECM residual strain, Mechanobiol. Med. 1 (2) (2023) 100025.

Outlines

/