认知语用学视野下的类同话语研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.05.003

当代外语研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 11-16.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.05.003

认知语用学视野下的类同话语研究

余盛明

广东外语外贸大学,广州,510420

发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:余盛明,广东外语外贸大学英语语言文化学院副教授、博士。主要研究方向为语用学、语篇分析、英语教育。电子邮箱:yushengming@gdufs.edu.cn
基金资助:
*本文得到广东外语外贸大学重点文科基地招标项目“语际语用范畴下的语言模糊性研究”(广外科[2011]1号)和广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心资助。广东外语外贸大学温宾利教授和冯光武教授对本文提出了宝贵修改意见,一并致谢。

A Pragma-Cognitive Approach to Similitudo Utterances

YU Shenming

Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以婚姻家庭类语料为基础,从语用和认知两个角度对类同话语进行分析。一方面,重点描述当类同话语作为语用现象时的语用特征,包括语用结构、语用功能、语用效果和实现方式;另一方面,试图解释当类同话语作为论辩策略时的心理认知机制。

关键词: 类同话语, 语用特征, 认知机制

Abstract: This article, based on data collected as of marriage/family topics, approaches Similitudo utterances from a pragma-cognitive perspective. On the one hand, it takes Similitudo as pragmatic resources and provides a description of its pragmatic features, including its pragmatic construct, functions, effects and modes of realizations; on the other hand, it takes Similitudo as argumentative strategies and interprets its cognitive mechanism.

中图分类号:

余盛明. 认知语用学视野下的类同话语研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(5): 11-16.

YU Shenming. A Pragma-Cognitive Approach to Similitudo Utterances[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(5): 11-16.

参考文献

Aristotle. 2007. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (2^nd ed. Trans. by G. Kennedy) [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching [M]. London: Longman.
Brummett, B. 2000. Reading Rhetorical Theory [M]. Orlando: Harcourt College.
Conley, T. 1983. Aristotle, Rhetoric Ⅰ [J]. Ancient Philosophy 3(1): 102-7.
Corbett, E. P. J. & R. J. Connors. 1999. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cottrell, S. 2005. Critical Thinking Skills: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Evans, V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar [A]. In A. Goldberg (ed.). Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language [C]. Stanford: CSLI.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks [J]. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-87.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books.
Fleming, D. 2003. Becoming thetorical [A]. In J. Petraglia & D. Bahri (eds.). The Realms of Rhetoric [C]. New York: State University of New York Press. 93-116.
Gilbert, A. 2004. Learn How to Be an Upright Person [M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press.
Goodnight, G. T. 1999. The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument [A]. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit & S. Caudill (eds.). Contemporary Rhetorical Theory: A Reader [C]. New York: Guilford Press. 251-64.
Grimaldi, W. M. A. 1978. Rhetoric and truth: A note on Aristotle [J]. Philosophy and Rhetoric 11(3): 173-77.
Huseman, R. C. 1994. Aristotle’s system of topics [A]. In E. Schiappa (ed.). Landmark Essays on Classical Greek Rhetoric [C]. Davis: Hermagoras Press. 191-99.
Johnson, S. 2002. One Minute Sales Person [M]. Haikou: Nanhai.
Petraglia, J. & D. Bahri. 2003. The Realms of Rhetoric [M]. New York: State University of New York Press.
Richland, L. E., T.-K. Chan, R. G. Morrison & T. K.-F. Au. 2010. Young children’s analogical reasoning across cultures: Similarities and differences [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 105: 146-53.
Sproule, J. M. 1980. Argument: Language and Its Influence [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
梁洁.2005.论临床护理中的换位思考[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报26(3):25-7.
秦明星.2010.类推:外语学习中使用的一种认知策略探析[J].鸡西大学学报10(3):108-9.
孙鹏勇.2006.浅议学生管理中的换位思考[J].陕西教育理论71:20-22.
孙振奎.2008.试论换位思考在构建和谐社会中的作用[J].廊坊师范学院学报24:75-6.
王中祥.2010.类比词语义认知的概念合成视角[J].浙江万里学院学报23:48-52.
赵宏宇.2002.试论英语类比构词[J].辽宁师范大学学报25(4):78-81.
周东海、邱小群.2005.换位思考:一个成功的伟大细节[M].北京:中华工商联合出版社.

[1]	练艺丹1，蔡俊1，张仲伟2，刘佳航1，王韬2. 大脑皮层对飞机飞越噪声的认知机制[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(8): 976-981.
[2]	钟书能, 梁嘉仪. 语言量域与肯定和否定对应认知机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(03): 73-78.
[3]	卢军羽. 图形-背景关系的可逆性与转喻的认知机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(11): 24-29.
[4]	庄美英;. 缓和性冲突回应——针对冒犯性话语的语用策略分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(07): 33-37.

认知语用学视野下的类同话语研究

A Pragma-Cognitive Approach to Similitudo Utterances

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价