中动词的性质与中动结构的构造

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.12.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中动词和中动结构是语言学界备受关注的研究话题。文章在对中动词的性质与特征进行了一番梳理之后提出:中动结构由两个动词构成,其中,前一个动词作为谓语动词,表示动作行为,后一个动词相当于补语小句,表示终点结果,二者合起来表示一个完整的事件,在结构上呈现一种“双动词”格局。这种假设可以对以往中动结构研究中许多令人困惑的问题作出合理的解释。

关键词: 中动词, 中动结构, 补语小句, 动词虚化和隐含, 双动词结构系统

Abstract: Middle constructions are a well-studied topic in linguistics. Based on a summary of the properties and features of middle verbs, this paper proposes that middle constructions are composed of two verbs, of which the first verb, serving as the predicate, denotes an action characteristic of conventional property or features, while the second verb, serving as a complement clause, denotes result. The combination of the two verbs denotes a complete event. Based on this, it is argued that all middle verbs must be of this nature in terms of underlying structure. Once this has been accepted, many long-standing puzzles related to middle constructions are solved quite readily.

中图分类号:

杨永忠. 中动词的性质与中动结构的构造[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(12): 19-24.

YANG Yongzhong. On the Nature of Middle Verbs and Middle Constructions[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(12): 19-24.

参考文献

Ackema, P. & M. Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface [J]. Lingua 93:59-90.
Ackema, P. & M. Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and nonmovement [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173-97.
Authier, J. -M. & L. Reed .1996. On the Canadian French middle [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 513-23.
Belleti, A. 1988. The case of unaccusatives [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19:1-4.
Carrier, J. & J. Randall. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173-234.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fagan, S. 1988. The English middle [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 181-203.
Fagan, S. 1992. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hale, K. & J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hoestra, T. & I. Roberts. 1993. Middle construction in Dutch and English [A]. In E. Reuland & W. Araham (eds.). Knowledge and Language. Vol.2, Lexical and Conceptual Structure [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 183-220.
Huang, C. -T. James. 1988. Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure [J].Language 64(2): 274-311.
Huang, C. -T. James. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection [J]. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 3: 45-89.
Huang, C. -T. James. 2007. Unaccusativity, ditransitives and extra-argumentality [R]. Paper presented at EACL 4, Leipzig.
Iwata, S. 1999. On the status of an implicit arguments in middles [J]. Journal of Linguistics 35:527-53.
Ji, X. 1995. The Middle Construction in English and Chinese [D]. MA thesis of The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Keyser, S. J. & T. Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 15:381-416.
Massam, D. 1992. Null objects and non-thematic subjects [J]. Journal of Linguistics 28: 115-37.
Ouhalla, J. 2001. Introducing Transformational Grammar: From Principles and Parameters to Minimalism [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press/London: Edward Arnold.
Plank, F. 1979. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations [M]. London: Academic Press.
Roberts, I. 1986. The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
Stroik, T. 1992. Middles and movement [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 23:127-37.
Stroik, T. 1995. On middle formation: A reply to Zribi-Hertz [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 26:165-71.
Stroik, T. 1999. Middles and reflexivity [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 119-31.
Sung, G. 1994. Case Assignment under Incorporation [D]. UCLA.
Yang, Y. 2011. Non-prototypical patient object sentences in Chinese [J]. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 42:105-27.
Yang, Y. 2012. Derivation of serial verb constructions [J]. Language Research 3: 665-90.
Zribi-Hertz, A. 1993. On Stroik’s analysis of English middle constructions [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 24:583-9.
曹宏.2004.中动句对动词形容词的选择限制及其理据[J].语言科学(1):11-28.
程工.1999.语言共性论[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
戴曼纯.2003.最简方案框架下的广义左向合并理论研究[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
丁声树、吕叔湘、李荣、孙德宣、管燮初、傅婧、黄盛璋、陈治文.1961.现代汉语语法讲话[M].北京:商务印书馆.
韩景泉.2003.英语中间结构的生成[J].外语教学与研究(3):179-88.
黄正德.2007.汉语动词的题元结构与其句法表现[J].语言科学(4):3-21.
马庆株.1992.汉语动词和动词性结构[M].北京:北京语言学院出版社.潘国英.2012.修饰成分作为降级述谓性成分的地位[J].世界汉语教学(1):54-64.
沈阳、R.Sybesma.2012.作格动词的性质和作格结构的构造[J].世界汉语教学(3):306-21.
石毓智、李讷.2001.汉语语法化的历程——形态句法发展的动因和机制[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
徐盛桓.2002.语义数量特征与英语中动结构[J].外语教学与研究(6):436-43.
杨永忠.2007.汉语中动句和作格化[J].对外汉语研究(3):74-85.
杨永忠.2014.指宾状语句的句法结构及推导[J].现代外语(1):32-41.

[1]	张智义, 倪传斌. 英汉中动结构的语义、结构及类别研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(10): 5-10.
[2]	张琴, 杨连瑞, 高秀雪. 从语义、语用和句法界面看英语中动结构及其习得[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(10): 43-48.