Modality, Vocabulary Size and Question Type as Mediators of Listening Comprehension Skill

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2013.12.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Most studies that have investigated the relationship between lexical knowledge and listening performance have used vocabulary assessments administered in the visual modality (e.g., Mecartty, 2000). However, the outcomes of vocabulary tests might vary as a function of the modality in which they are carried out (e.g. Milton & Hopkins, 2005, 2007). Aural knowledge of words might be particularly important in listening, therefore using visually measured lexical knowledge as a predictor of listening performance could be problematic. To explore this issue, 51 English as a second language (L2) learners from a vocational training institute in Hong Kong aged between 18 and 19 were given two different versions of the X Lex vocabulary test: (1) the visual X Lex (Meara & Milton, 2003) and (2) the Aural Lex (Milton & Hopkins, 2005). The listening sub-test of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) was also administered to measure participants' listening performance. The results indicated that (1) participants scored higher in the X Lex than the Aural Lex; (2) the Aural Lex was a stronger predictor of listening performance than the X Lex; (3) participants' proficiency in aural vocabulary influenced performance on the listening test. These results suggest that visual measurements of lexical knowledge may not as accurately reflect the learners' aural knowledge of words and therefore, the modality in which (lexical) knowledge is assessed when estimating vocabulary as a predictor of other skills needs to be considered.

关键词: modality, vocabulary, aural vocabulary, listening comprehension INTRODUCTION

VICTORIA A. MURPHYJUAN, JR. T. CASTILLO. Modality, Vocabulary Size and Question Type as Mediators of Listening Comprehension Skill[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(12): 15-30.

参考文献

Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49-78.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Call, M. E. (1985). Auditory short-term memory, listening comprehension, and the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 765-781.
Chang, A. C. S. (2007). The impact of vocabulary preparation on L2 listening comprehension, confidence and strategy use. System, 35, 534-550.
Field, J. (2003). Promoting perception: Lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal, 57, 325-334.
Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners' problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System, 32, 363-377.
Goh, C.C.M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55-75.
Graham, S. & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747-783.
Hindmarsh, R. (1980). Cambridge English lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoare, P. & Kong, S. (2008). Late immersion in Hong Kong: Still stressed or making progress? In T. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.). Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 242-263). Clevedon: Maltilingual Matters.
Kang, S. H. K., Gollan, T. H., & Pashler, H. (2013). Don't just repeat after me: Retrieval practice is better than imitation for foreign vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Published online, 17 May, 2013. DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0450-z
Karimi, M. N. (2013). Enhancing L2 students' listening transcription ability through a focus on morphological awareness. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 451-459.
Koda, K. (1989). The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 529-540.
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension. Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics, 3, 16-323.
Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-194.
Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 377-444). Rowley: Newbury House.
Long, M. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
Lund, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 75, 196-204.
Lupker, S.J. (2007). Visual word recognition: Theories and Findings. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook. Oxford: Blackwell.
Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A Review of Listening Strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and success. In A.D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meara, P. & Milton, J. (2003). X_Lex: Swansea vocabulary levels test (version 2.02). Wales, UK: Swansea University.
Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323-348.
Milton, J. & Hopkins, N. (2005). Aural Lex. Wales: Swansea University.
Milton, J. & Hopkins, N. (2007). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 127-147.
Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D., & Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
Murphy, V. A. (1997). The effect of modality on a grammaticality judgment task. Second Language Research, 13, 34-65.
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418-437.
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. London & New York: Longman.
Rost, M. (2005). L2 listening. In E. Henkel (Ed), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Stæhr, L.S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577-607.
Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36, 139-152.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
Sydorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 50-73.
Tang, C. (1994). Assessment and student learning: Effects of modes of assessment on students' preparation strategies. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice. (pp. 151-170). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, The Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
Tsui, A. B. M. & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics, 19, 432-451.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 65-86.
Woore, R. (2010). Thinking aloud about L2 decoding: An exploration into the strategies used by beginner learners when pronouncing unfamiliar French words. Language Learning Journal, 38, 3-17.
Xue, G. & Nation, I. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3, 215-229.