形式标记功能解释的矛盾及其消解——以代用代词it的隐性纯理功能为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.01.002

当代外语研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01): 6-13.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.01.002

• 适用语言学专栏∙理论篇 • 上一篇下一篇

形式标记功能解释的矛盾及其消解——以代用代词it的隐性纯理功能为例

董保华

西南大学,重庆,400715/重庆科技学院,重庆,401331

出版日期:2015-01-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:董保华,重庆科技学院外国语学院副教授、西南大学外国语学院2013级在读博士。主要研究方向为系统功能语言学、认知语言学、二语习得。电子邮箱:sisudbh@163.com
基金资助:
*本文系中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“意义识解观研究:M. A. K. Halliday语言认知思想探索”(编号SWU1409273)的阶段性研究成果。

Re-explaining Metafunctions of Formal Markers: A Case Study of the Cryptofunctions of Prop it

DONG Baohua

Online:2015-01-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从目前文献看,形式标记的功能解释与系统功能语言学的“意义承诺”、“功能承诺”相去甚远。本文基于B. L. Whorf(1956)的隐性范畴思想与M. A. K. Halliday(2014)的渐变群思想,以形式标记代用代词it的纯理功能为例,探讨如何消解形式标记功能解释上的自相矛盾。研究发现,在隐性范畴视角下,代用代词it的纯理功能得到统一解释,从而有力地证明系统功能语言学有关“形式获得功能解释”的理论假设。

关键词: 形式标记, 代用代词it, 隐性概念功能, 隐性人际功能, 隐性语篇功能

Abstract: Literature shows that the explanations of metafunctions for formal markers are at odds with semiotic and functional commitment in systemic functional linguistics. This paper, based on the covert categories or the cryptotypes proposed by B. L. Whorf (1956) and the clines by M. A. K. Halliday (2014), takes the crypto-functional exploration of formal marker prop it as a case study. The purpose is to eliminate the contradictory explanations in metafunctions of formal markers through the cryptotypes. In light of the cryptotypes, the metafunctions of prop it can reach unified accountability and the theoretical hypothesis that “language forms should be accounted for by their functions” has been well verified.

中图分类号:

H0-06

董保华. 形式标记功能解释的矛盾及其消解——以代用代词it的隐性纯理功能为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(01): 6-13.

DONG Baohua. Re-explaining Metafunctions of Formal Markers: A Case Study of the Cryptofunctions of Prop it[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 6-13.

参考文献

Berry, M. 1995. Thematic options and success in writing [A]. In M. Ghadessy (ed.). Thematic Development in English Texts [C]. London: Pinter. 55-84.
Bolinger, D. L. 1977. Meaning and Form [M]. London: Longman.
Downing, A. & P. Locke. 1992. A University Course in English Grammar [M]. London: Prentice Hall.
Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics [M]. London: Pinter.
Enkvist, N. E. 1993. Three dynamics and style: An equipment [J]. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia (5): 127-35.
Fawcett, R. 2000. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gleason, H. A., Jr. 1965. Linguistics and English Grammar [M]. New York: Holt Rhinehart & Winston.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1969/1981. Options and functions in the English clause [J]. Brno Papers in Linguistics (8): 81-88. Reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.). Readings in Systemic Linguistics [C]. London: Batsford. 138-45.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994/2000. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold/Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) (C. M. I. M. Matthiessen rev.) [M]. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. 2013. With Herman Parret [A]. In J. R. Martin (ed.). Interviews with M. A. K. Halliday: Language Turned Back on Himself [C]. London: Bloomsbury. 1-40.
Halliday, M. A. K. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) (C. M. I. M. Matthiessen rev.) [M]. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London & New York: Continuum.Kaltenböck, G. 1998. Extraposition in English Discourse: A Corpus Study [D]. Vienna: University of Vienna.
Kaltenböck, G. 1999. Which it is it? Some remarks on anticipatory it [J]. Views (8): 48-71.
Kaltenböck, G. 2002. That’s it? On the unanticipated “controversy” over anticipatory it. A reply to Aimo Seppänen [J]. English Studies (6): 541-50.
Kaltenböck, G. 2003. On the syntactic and semantic status of anticipatory it [J]. English Language and Linguistics (7): 235-55.
Painter, C. 2004. The “Interpersonal First” principle in child language development [A]. In G. Williams & A. Lukin (eds.). The Development of Language: Functional Perspectives on Species and Individuals [C]. London: Continuum. 137-57.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language [M]. London: Longman.
Stainton, C. 1993. Metadiscourse and the Analytical Text: A Genre-Based Approach to Children’s Written Discourse [D]. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Thompson, G. 1996. Introducing Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold.
Thompson, G. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold.
Whorf, B. L. 1956. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf [C]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
胡壮麟、朱永生、张德禄、李战子.2005.系统功能语言学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
黄国文.2009.系统功能语言学研究中的整合[J].中国外语(1):17-24.
黄国文、丁建新.2001.沃尔夫论隐性范畴[J].外语教学与研究(4):299-305.
夸克等.1989.英语语法大全(苏州大学《英语语法大全》翻译组译)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.
王勇.2005.预指代词it的系统功能语言学研究[J].现代外语(3):265-71.
王振华.2013.系统功能语言学的演变:小句之外——J·R·马丁教授访谈录[J].当代外语研究(10).1-12.
沃夫.2001.论语言、思维与现实(高一虹等译)[C].长沙:湖南教育出版社.
徐林.1987.Halliday《功能语法导论》介绍(上)[J].国外语言学(1):17-24.
杨炳钧.2001.形式标记的元功能分析[J].现代外语(3):237-48.
章振邦.2000.新编英语语法教程(第三版)[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.

形式标记功能解释的矛盾及其消解——以代用代词it的隐性纯理功能为例

Re-explaining Metafunctions of Formal Markers: A Case Study of the Cryptofunctions of Prop it

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价