二语形态-句法习得关键期假说的ERP研究综述

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.10.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文综述了基于ERP技术的形态-句法角度下的第二语言习得关键期假说的最新成果,总结评述了以往关键期假说的支持派及反对派的研究。通过综述,本研究支持了趋向性假说(Convergence Hypothesis),即高水平的二语学习者与母语者在语言形态-句法方面的ERP基本无差异。另外,本文也就该领域的研究前景进行了简要讨论。

关键词: 第二语言习得, 关键期假说, 趋向性假说

Abstract: This paper reviews the latest development of Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) based on ERP technology in second morpho-syntactic acquisition. It first examines the previous studies supporting the CHP and analyzes the methodological problems. The latest research that objects to CPH is also discussed. It demonstrates that Convergence Hypothesis is supported by an increasing number of researchers. No significant difference was found between second language learners with high proficiency levels and the native speakers in morpho-syntactic acquisition. Finally, the authors discuss the future research prospects in the area.

中图分类号:

H319

杨连瑞, 马菲菲, 陈士法, 刘辉. 二语形态-句法习得关键期假说的ERP研究综述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(10): 25-29.

YANG Lianrui, MA Feifei, CHEN Shifa. The Related ERP Studies on Critical Period of Morpho-syntactic Acquisition by Second Language Learners[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(10): 25-29.

参考文献

Abrahamsson, N. 2012. Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(2): 187-214.
Birdsong, D. 2005. Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition [A]. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (eds.). Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches [C]. New York: Oxford University Press. 109-27.
Coulson, S., J. W. King & M. Kutas. 1998. Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 13(1): 21-58.
Chomsky, N. 2007. Of minds and language [J]. Biolinguistics 1: 9-27.
DeKeyser, R. M. 2012. Age effects in second language learning [A]. In S.M. Gass & A. Mackey (eds). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. London: Routledge. 442-60.
Dowens, M. G., M. Vergara, H. A. Barber & M. Carreiras. 2010. Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(8): 1870-87.
Dowens, M. G., T. Guo, J. Guo, H. Barber & M. Carreiras. 2011. Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish-Evidence from Event Related Potentials [J]. Neuropsychologia 49(7): 1651-59.
Friederici, A. D., E. Pfeifer & A. Hahne. 1993. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations [J]. Cognitive Brain Research 1(3): 183-92.
Friederici, A. D., K. Steinhauer & E. Pfeifer. 2002. Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis [J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(1): 529-34.
Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Green, D. W. 2003. The neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition: The convergence hypothesis’ [A]. In R.van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken & R. Towell (eds). The Interface between Syntax and the Lexicon in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 197-208.
Gunter, T. C., A. D Friederici & H. Schriefers. 2000. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12(4): 556-68.
Hahne, A. 2001. What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30(3): 251-66.
Hahne, A. & A. D. Friederici. 2001. Processing a second language: Late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials [J].Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(2): 123-41.
Johnson, J. S. & E. L. Newport. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language [J]. Cognitive Psychology 21(1): 60-99.
Lenneberg, E. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language [M]. New York: Wiley.
Morgan-Short, K., C. Sanz, K. Steinhauer & M. T. Ullman. 2010. Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study [J]. Language Learning 60(1): 154-93.
Morgan-Short, K., K. Steinhauer, C. Sanz & M. T. Ullman. 2012. Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(4): 933-47.
Moyer, A. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(1): 81-108.
Mueller, J. L., A. Hahne, Y. Fujii & A. D. Friederici. 2005. Native and nonnative speakers’ processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(8): 1229-44.
Neville, H., J. L. Nicol, A. Barss, K. I. Forster & M. F. Garrett. 1991. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(2): 151-65.
Newman, A. J., M. T. Ullman, R. Pancheva, D. L. Waligura & H. J. Neville. 2007. An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection [J]. Neuroimage 34(1): 435-45.
Nickels, S., B. Opitz & K. Steinhauer. 2013. ERPs show that classroom-instructed late second language learners rely on the same prosodic cues in syntactic parsing as native speakers [J]. Neuroscience Letters 557: 107-11.
Noort, M.W.,M.L. Van, den M.P.C. Bosch, T. Hadzibeganovic, K. Mondt, M. Haverkort & K. Hugdahl. 2010. Identifying the neural substrates of second language acquisition: What is the contribution from functional and structural MRI [J]. Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistic Perspectives on SLA: 3-16.
Penfield, W. & L. Roberts. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rossi, S., M. F. Gugler, A. D. Friederici & A. Hahne. 2006. The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 2030-48.
Skehan, P. 1989. Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Steinhauer, K. 2014. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2 [J]. Applied Linguistics 35(4): 393-417.
Steinhauer, K. & J. E. Drury. 2012. On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies [J]. Brain and Language 120(2): 135-62.
Steinhauer, K., E. J. White & J. E. Drury. 2009. Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J]. Second Language Research 25(1): 13-41.
Weber-Fox, C. M. & H. J. Neville. 1996. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8(3): 231-56.
Weber-Fox, C. M. & H. J. Neville. 1999. Functional neural subsystems are differentially affected by delays in second language immersion: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilinguals [A]. In D. Birdsong (ed). New Perspectives on the Critical Period for Second Language Acquistion [C]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. 23-38.
曹贤文.2015.《敏感期、语言学能和最终二语习得状态》述介[J].外语教学与研究47(3):474-78.
柴省三.2013.汉语作为第二语言习得的关键期假设研究[J].外语教学与研究45(5):692-706.
常欣、朱黄华、王沛.2014.跨语言句法结构相似性对二语句法加工的影响[J].外语教学与研究46(4):560-71.
崔艳嫣、刘振前.2010.二语心理词库组织模式发展的实证研究[J].外语教学(2):35-38.
戴运财.2006.语言学能对二语习得的影响[J].外语教学与研究38(6):451-59.
耿立波、杨亦鸣.2013.第二语言句法的自动加工:来自脑电的证据[J].外语教学与研究45(3):374-84.
杨连瑞、崔鹏.2012.论争中的临界期假说再思考[J].外语教学理论与实践(3):43-49.
张辉.2014.二语学习者句法加工的ERP研究[J].解放军外国语学院学报37(1):88-99.

[1]	蒋楠;范莉;乔晓妹;张辉;杨枫;吴诗玉;. 第二语言加工:学科内容、研究方法及与二语习得的关系[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(06): 1-8+108.
[2]	袁芳远. 从四大理论/教学框架看任务教学研究的发展[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 40-46.
[3]	姜孟;邓小燕;欧平娅;. 第二语言习得关键期假说五十年之争[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, 10(09): 10-16+61.