第二语言加工:学科内容、研究方法及与二语习得的关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2016.06.001

当代外语研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06): 1-8.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2016.06.001

• 特稿 • 下一篇

第二语言加工:学科内容、研究方法及与二语习得的关系

蒋楠, 范莉, 乔晓妹, 张辉, 杨枫, 吴诗玉

University of Maryland,College Park,MD 20742;
北京林业大学,北京,100083;
上海财经大学,上海,200433;
南京师范大学,南京,210097;
上海交通大学,上海,200240

出版日期:2016-11-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:蒋楠,博士,美国马里兰大学。主要研究方向为二语加工、二语习得。电子邮箱:njiang@umd.edu。范莉,博士,北京林业大学外语学院副教授、硕士生导师。主要研究方向为语言早期习得、形式语言学。电子邮箱:fansong_cn@yahoo.com。乔晓妹,博士,上海财经大学外国语学院教授、硕士生导师。主要研究方向为二语加工、英语教学法。电子邮箱:xqiao@mail.shufe.edu.cn。张辉,博士,南京师范大学教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为二语加工、认知语言学。电子邮箱:coglinger2011@126.com。杨枫,博士,上海交通大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为应用语言学、比较文学与翻译。电子邮箱:efone1988@163.com。吴诗玉,博士,上海交通大学外国语学院副教授、硕士生导师。主要研究方向为二语加工、二语习得。电子邮箱:shiyuw@sjtu.edu.cn

Second Language Processing: Its Topics, Methodology and Relationship with Second Language Acquisition

JIANG Nan, FAN Li, QIAO Xiaomei, ZHANG Hui, YANG Feng, WU Shiyu

Online:2016-11-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 第二语言加工研究起源于20世纪80年代,是心理学在第二语言研究上的延伸。基于文献资料与实例说明,本文界定了第二语言加工的跨语言特性、厘清了研究内容的分支、介绍了研究途径与方法、分析了研究推进中的阻碍。第二语言加工研究具有课题上、方法论上的独特性,但又与相邻学科紧密相连:植根于心理学,与理论语言学研究、儿童语言发展研究、脑科学研究紧密交接,尤其是第二语言习得研究。研究提出,必须加强跨学科的合作交流、融合贯通、凸显特性,才能促使第二语言加工成为统一而独立的学科。

关键词: 第二语言加工, 第二语言习得, 学科内容, 研究方法, 跨学科性质

Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the emerging field of second language processing research. It defines what second language processing is, outlines research topics and areas in this field, identifies its methodological approaches, and discusses the relationship between second language processing research and second language acquisition research.

中图分类号:

H319

蒋楠, 范莉, 乔晓妹, 张辉, 杨枫, 吴诗玉. 第二语言加工:学科内容、研究方法及与二语习得的关系[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(06): 1-8.

JIANG Nan, FAN Li, QIAO Xiaomei, ZHANG Hui, YANG Feng, WU Shiyu. Second Language Processing: Its Topics, Methodology and Relationship with Second Language Acquisition[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2016, 16(06): 1-8.

参考文献

Asher, J. & G. Garcia. 1969. The optimal age to learn a foreign language [J]. Modern Language Journal 38: 334-341.
Baker, W. & P. Trofimovich. 2006. Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences [J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics 44: 231-250.
Chang, C. B. & A. Mishler. 2012. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132: 2700-2710.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax [M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1972. Language and Mind (enlarged edition) [M]. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use [M]. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. 2000. The Architecture of Language (edited by N. Mukherji, B.N. Patnaik & R.K. Agnihotri) [M]. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Clahsen, H., L. Balkhair, J.-S. Schutter & I. Cunnings. 2013. The time course of morphological processing in a second language [J]. Second Language Research 29: 7-31.
DeKeyser, R.M. 2003. Implicit and explicit learning [A]. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds.). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. Malden: Blackwell. 313-348.
Ellis, R. 2002. Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 223-236
Flege, J.E. 1987.The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification [J].Journal of Phonetics 15: 47-65.
Flege, J. E. 1988. Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 70-79.
Foucart, A. & C. Frenck-Mestre. 2011. Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1-L2 syntactic similarity [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(3): 379-399.
Gass, S. M. 1987. The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 8: 329-350.
Gass, S. & L. Selinker. 2001. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (2nd edn.) [M]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goto, H. 1971. Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “l” and “r” [J]. Neuropsychologica 9: 317-323.
Harrington, M. 1987. Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 8: 351-377.
Ivanova, I. & A. Costa. 2008. Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? [J] Acta Psychologia 127: 277-288.
Iverson, P., P.K. Kuhl, R. Akahane-Yamada, E. Diesch, Y.I. Tohkura, A. Kettermann & C. Siebert. 2003. A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes [J]. Cognition 87: B47-B57.
Jiang, N. 2004. Morphological insensitivity in second language processing [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 25: 603-634.
Jiang, N. 2007. Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning [J]. Language Learning 57: 1-33.
Jiang, N. & T. M. Nekrasova. 2007. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers [J]. The Modern Language Journal 91: 433-445.
Jiang, N., E. Novokshanova, K. Masuda & X. Wang. 2011. Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes [J]. Language Learning 61: 940-967.
Jiang, N., T. Guo & M. Li. 2013. Translation frequency effect in L2 word recognition: Replication and extension [R]. Vocab@vic, University of Wellington, New Zealand, December 19, 2013.
Johnson, J. S. & E.L. Newport. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influences of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language [J]. Cognitive Psychology 21: 60-99.
Kilborn, K. 1989. Sentence processing in a second language: The timing of transfer [J]. Language and Speech 32: 1-23.
Kirsner, K., H. L. Brown, S. Abrol, N. K. Chadha & N. K. Sharma. 1980. Bilingualism and lexical representation [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32: 585-594.
Kirsner, K., M.C. Smith, R.S. Lockhart, M.L. King & M. Jain. 1984. The bilingual lexicon: Language specific units in an integrated network [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 519-539.
Koda, K. 1989. Effects of Ll orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18: 201-222.
Li, M., N. Jiang & K. Gor. 2015. L1 and L2 processing of compound words: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000681.
McLaughlin, J., D. Tanner, I. Pitkanen, C. Trench-Mestre, K. Innoue, G. Valentine & L. Osterhout. 2010. Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning [J]. Language Learning 60 (2): 123-150.
Meulman, N., L. A. Stowe, S.W. Sprenger, M. Bresser & M.S. Schmid. 2014. A ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail? [J]. Frontier in Psychology 5: 01072.
Mueller, J. L. 2005. Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing [J]. Second Language Research 21(2): 152-174.
Neufeld, G. 1978. On the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features in adult language learning [J]. The Canadian Modern Language Review 34: 163-174.
Papadopoulou, D. & H. Clahsen. 2003. Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(4): 501-528.
Patkowski, M. 1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language [J]. Language Learning 30: 449-472.
Pavlenko, A. & B. C. Malt. 2011. Kitchen russian: Cross-linguistic differences and first-language object naming by Russian-English bilinguals [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14: 19-45.
Peltola, M.S., T. Kujala, J. Tuomainen, M. Ek, O. Aaltonen & R. Näätänen. 2003. Native and foreign vowel discrimination as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) response [J]. Neuroscience Letters 352(1):25-28.
Penfield, W. & L. Roberts. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Potter, M.C., K. So, B. von Eckardt & L.B. Feldman. 1984. Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 23: 23-38.
Prévost, P. & L. White. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement [J]. Second Language Research 16: 103-133.
Rüschemeyer, S. A., C. J. Fiebach, V. Kempe & A. D. Friederici. 2005. Processing lexical semantic and syntactic information in first and second language: fMRI evidence from German and Russian [J]. Human brain mapping 25(2): 266-286.
Sabourin, W. & L. Stowe. 2008. Second language processing: When are first and second language processed similarly? [J]. Second Language Research 24:397-430.
Steinhauer, K., E. J. White & J. E. Drury. 2009. Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J]. Second Language Research 25:13-41.
Swaab, T. Y., K. Ledoux, C. C. Cainblin & M. Boudewyn. 2012. Language-related ERP components [A]. In S. J. Lick & E.S.Kappenman (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Event-related Potential Components [C]. New York: OUP. 397-439.
Thierry, G. & Y. J. Wu. 2007. Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension [A]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(30): 12530-12535.
Williams, J. N., P. Möbius & C. Kim. 2001. Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 22: 509-540.
Zampini, M.L. 1998. The relationship between the production and perception of L2 Spanish Stops [J]. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education 3: 85-100.
Zhang, T., W.J. van Heuven & K. Conklin. 2011. Fast automatic translation and morphological decomposition in Chinese-English bilinguals [J]. Psychological Science 22: 1237-1242.

[1]	王艳艳. 论商务英语的主要研究对象——商务话语教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(01): 50-56.
[2]	杨连瑞, 马菲菲, 陈士法, 刘辉. 二语形态-句法习得关键期假说的ERP研究综述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(10): 25-29.
[3]	徐锦芬. 外语课堂研究:回顾与展望[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(09): 1-6.
[4]	袁芳远. 从四大理论/教学框架看任务教学研究的发展[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 40-46.
[5]	邱春安. 语音演变的研究方法:现状与发展趋势[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(02): 13-17.
[6]	侯林平, 李燕妮. 翻译过程研究的整合途径及其在翻译教育中的启示[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(11): 49-53.
[7]	周频朱文茜. 对索绪尔语言理论的科学精神与科学方法的探析与反思[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(07): 19-24.
[8]	魏蓉, 范琳. 第二语言词汇推理加工研究述评[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(07): 30-34.
[9]	章柏成;. 自我概念研究新进展——《探索语言自我概念》评介[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(10): 74-75.
[10]	姜孟;邓小燕;欧平娅;. 第二语言习得关键期假说五十年之争[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, 10(09): 10-16+61.

第二语言加工:学科内容、研究方法及与二语习得的关系

Second Language Processing: Its Topics, Methodology and Relationship with Second Language Acquisition

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价