中国学习者英语进行体的习得

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 英语时体习得历来是语言习得领域的研究重点。本文探讨中国学习者对英语进行体标记-ing习得的情况, 具体研究情状体对进行体习得的影响,检验情状体假设和原型假设。语料选自中国英语学习者语料库的两个子语料库即ST5(低年级学习者)和ST6(高年级学习者)。语法测试的受试为湖南大学学生,低年级与高年级英语专业学习者各30人。数据结果借助SPSS 19.0软件分析,研究发现:(1)英语进行体的产出跟情状体联系紧密。语料库研究结果发现:对于英语专业低年级与高年级学生,情状体类型在语料库中的频率呈现明显的层级结构:活动动词>完结动词>达成动词>状态动词,这与情状体假设的预测相符。(2)通过分析语法测试结果得知情状体同样影响中国学习者对英语进行体的理解。英语专业低年级组跟高年级组对进行体的意义接受度都有显著的层级结构:活动动词>达成动词>状态动词。同样也支持情状体假说。特定状语也影响学习者对于进行体意义的理解。高年级学习者的语法测试结果完全符合原型假设的预测:进行意义＞惯常意义 / 将来意义＞状态进行意义。但低年级组的接受度层级为:进行意义＞将来意义＞惯常意义 / 状态进行意义,这与原型假设的预测有偏差。(3)英语水平对进行体习得有影响,但不显著。

关键词: 情状体, 英语进行体, 情状体假说, 原型假说, 中国英语学习者

Abstract: The acquisition of tense and aspect has always been the research focus in the field of SLA. This paper studies the acquisition of English progressive aspect marker -ing by Chinese learners. Its main focus is on the effect of lexical aspect on the acquisition of English progressive marker. The aspect hypothesis and the prototype hypothesis are tested through examining the production data from CLEC (Chinese Learner English Corpus) and comprehension data from a grammaticality judgment test. The corpora ST5 (freshman English majors) and ST6 (senior English majors) of CLEC were chosen as the production data. In the grammaticality judgment test, the participants are the students from Hunan University, including 30 freshmen English majors and 30 senior English majors. SPSS 19.0 is employed to analyze the results. We have the following findings:(1)The production of English progressive marker is strongly connected with lexical aspects. For both freshmen and seniors as English majors, the frequency of four lexical aspect types in the corpora is in an obvious hierarchy, activities> accomplishments > achievements > statives. The results are in support of the aspect hypothesis.(2) After analyzing the GJT results, it is found that lexical aspect also affects the comprehension of English progressive marker among Chinese learners, for both groups accept the progressive meanings with a significant hierarchy of lexical aspects, activities> achievements > statives. The comprehension results also agree with the aspect hypothesis. Certain adverbials also affect comprehension of progressive marking. The results of the senior group totally consist with the prediction of the prototype account, with the acceptance in a sequence of process (activity) > habitual / futurate > stative progressive. But the freshmen group shows an acceptance sequence of process (activity) > futurate > habitual/ stative progressive, which does not consist with the prototype hypothesis. (3) The two proficiency levels (freshman and senior English majors) only have a little influence on the acquisition of progressive marking in English.

中图分类号:

H319.3

陈晓湘, 江桥, 曾晓燕. 中国学习者英语进行体的习得[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(03): 65-73.

CHEN Xiaoxiang, JIANG Qiao, ZENG Xiaoyan. The Acquisition of English Progressive Aspect Marker by Chinese Learners[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(03): 65-73.

参考文献

Andersen, R. W. & Y. Shirai 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 133-156.
Andersen, R. W. & Y. Shirai. 1996. Primacy of aspect in language acquisition [A]. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia(eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. San Diego: Academic Press.527-570.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & D. W. Reynolds. 1995. The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect [J]. TESOL Quarterly 29(1): 107-131.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(4): 471-508.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1999. From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-asepct research in SLA [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (21): 341-382.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use [M]. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Bayley, R. J. 1994. Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past tense marking in Chinese-English [A]. In S. Gass, A. Cohen & E. Tarone(eds.). Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition[C]. NJ: Erlbaum.157-181.
Chan, H. L. 2012. Tense-Aspect Processing in Second Language Learners [D]. University of Pittsburgh.
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gabriele, A. & C. Alonso. 2011. No time like the present: Examining transfer at the interfaces in second language acquisition [J]. Lingua 121: 670-687.
Gabriele, A. & W. McClure. 2011. Why some imperfectives are interpreted imperfectly: A study of Chinese learners of Japanese [J]. Language Acquisition 18 (1): 39-83.
Housen, A. 2002. The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect [A]. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds.). The L2 Acquisition of Tense-aspect Morphology [C]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.155-198.
Li, P. & Y. Shirai. 2000. The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect [M]. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Madden, C. J. & R. A. Zwaan.2003. How does verb aspect constrain event representations? [J]. Memory and Language 55: 381-401.
Robison, R. E. 1995. The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage [J]. Applied Linguistics 16: 344-370.
Rohde, A. 1996. The aspect hypothesis and emergence of tense distinction in naturalistic L2 acquisition [J]. Linguistics 34: 1115-1138.
Shirai.Y. 1991. Primacy of Aspect in Language Acquisition: Simplified Input and Prototype [D]. University of California.
Shirai, Y. & A. Kurono. 1998. The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language [J]. Language Learning 48(2):245-179.
Sugaya, N. & Y. Shirai. 2007. The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, universals, or multiple factors? [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1-38.
Tracy-Ventura, N. & F. Myles. 2015. The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research [J]. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 58-95.
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy [M]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Viquez, A. J. C. 2010. Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology in English by Native Speakers of Costa Rican Spanish: the Case of Simple Present and Present Progressive [D]. University of Kansas.
Yap, F.H, P. C. K. Chu, E. S. M. Yiu, S. F. Wong, S. W. Kwan, S. Matthew, L. H. Tan, P. Li & Y. Shirai. 2009. Aspectual asymmetries in the mental representation of events: Role of lexical and grammatical aspect [J]. Memory & Cognition 37: 587-595.
蔡金亭.2002.英语过渡语中的动词屈折变化——对情状体优先假设的检验[J]. 外语教学与研究(2):107-115.
蔡金亭.2004.情状体和语篇结构对英语过渡语中一般过去时标记的影响[J]. 外语教学与研究(1):49-56
王剑、蔡金亭.2006.汉英过渡语中语法体与情状体的关系[J].外语学刊(4):82-87

[1]	王晓琳, 姜英, 方南, 张萍. 词类型、翻译优势及具体性效应在翻译歧义词加工中的交互[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 57-69.
[2]	陈鹏;. 基于语料库的中国英语学习者连接词使用研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, 10(06): 28-34+62.