当代外语研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 59-67.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.06.007

• 语言学与应用语言学 • 上一篇    下一篇

区域类型特色壮语双宾论元交替句式的产出分布

向课书(), 吴芙芸()   

  1. 上海交通大学,上海,200240
  • 出版日期:2020-11-28 发布日期:2021-10-13
  • 作者简介:向课书,上海交通大学博士生。主要研究方向为二语习得与加工、心理语言学。电子邮箱: xiangkeshu@163.com;|吴芙芸,上海交通大学外国语学院教授。主要研究方向为心理语言学。电子邮箱: fywu@sjtu.edu.cn

The Distribution of the Double Object Argument Alternations with Unique Areal Typology in Zhuang

XIANG Keshu(), Fuyun()   

  • Online:2020-11-28 Published:2021-10-13

摘要:

类型学研究显示,同一语言较少同时使用双宾结构和倒置双宾结构。但在中国部分南方方言和少数民族语言中,二者广泛出现。针对这两种可替换结构,现有研究多集中于结构特征分析,然而其使用频率和语法可接受度到底如何,鲜有精确量化。本文以壮语为考察对象,采用图片诱导句子产出及语法可接受度判断,对这两种结构予以量化实验考察。结果显示:在产出频率上,倒置双宾结构显著高于双宾结构;在句子可接受度上,两种结构无显著差异。研究结果说明壮语中的倒置双宾是基本结构,使用更广,符合区域类型学特征。

关键词: 壮语, 双宾结构, 倒置双宾结构, 使用频率, 图片诱导

Abstract:

Typologically it is rarely found in a language both double object (DO) and shifted double object (SDO). However, DO/SDO alternations seem prevalent in Chinese Southern dialects and in south-China ethnic languages. Previous studies have mainly focused on structural analyses of these two alternative structures, with little work on precise quantification regarding their usage frequencies and grammatical acceptability. Using a picture-elicitation task and a grammaticality judgment task, we aimed to verify the frequency of use of the DO/SDO alternations in Zhuang. Our results showed that in terms of production rate, significantly more SDO utterances were produced than DO utterances, whereas in terms of grammaticality rating, no significant difference was found between DO and SDO. We conclude that SDO as a basic structure is more prevalent in Zhuang, which is a hallmark of areal typology.

中图分类号: