钱冠连学术思想史

语言研究的智慧与方法——钱冠连的哲学思想和“钱冠连的绳子”

展开
  • 西南大学,重庆,400715
杜世洪,西南大学外国语学院教授,西方语言哲学方向博士。主要研究方向为语言哲学、认知语言学和翻译研究。电子邮箱:dusserl_du@126.com

网络出版日期: 2020-07-25

基金资助

*国家社科项目“话语理解中他心语境与语义连贯的互动关系研究”(编号12BYY122)、教育部人文社科项目“程式性言语事件研究”(编号10YJC740015)和“如何借言行事:递归性的语用视角”(编号13YJC740051)的阶段性成果。

Toward the Wisdom and Methodology in Language Studies: Qian Guanlian’s Philosophical Thoughts and Qian Guanlian’s Rope

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

摘要

哲学轨道上的语言研究需要的是哲学的智慧与方法。钱冠连的语言研究在哲学轨道上进行,走出了一条由语言现象研究通往开启智慧之门的道路。在这条道路上,钱冠连化智慧为理论、化理论为方法,展现了苏格拉底式的审查法、柏拉图式的构想法和亚里士多德式的范畴法。钱冠连在审查中形成研究问题,在构想中推出新的概念和理论,而在明定范畴时,则是在语言经验事实的研究中做到“明类、知故、晓理”。钱冠连在《美学语言学》中提出的哲学问题,在《语言全息论》和《语言:人类最后的家园》中得到了回答。钱冠连的哲学思想是对古希腊宇宙观的发问与解答。古希腊哲学家虽然认识到了“宇宙的秩序”同“人类思想的秩序”类似,但似乎未找到这两种秩序的联系方法。钱冠连找到了捆绑这两种秩序的方法。语言全息关系就是用来捆绑宇宙、人和语言的绳子。“钱冠连的绳子”还用来串起语词与世界的道理,把人的存在维系在程式性语言行为中。“钱冠连的绳子”是一项不容忽视的哲学贡献。

本文引用格式

杜世洪 . 语言研究的智慧与方法——钱冠连的哲学思想和“钱冠连的绳子”[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014 , 14(06) : 20 -25 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.06.004

Abstract

Language studies should be kept on the track of pursuing philosophical wisdom and methodology. Qian Guanlian has been committed to the cause of building a philosophical road out of the jungles of daily language use, by means of transforming wisdom into theories and methodologies. His commitment is a fruitful combination of Socratic examination, Platonic formulation, and Aristotelian categorization, during which his philosophical questions have been raised, new concepts and theories proposed, and empirical studies of language use conducted through a series of categorizing, reasoning and generalizing. A remarkable philosophical question, raised in his Aesthetic Linguistics, has been answered in his works such as The Theory of Language Holography and the book entitled Language: The Last Homestead of Human Beings. His theory of language holography is metaphorically a rope which is used to integrate the order of cosmos with language in tune with the order of human mind. Thus, on the one hand, Qian Guanlian’s rope has helped ancient Greek philosophers to figure out a way of harnessing the relation of cosmos to human mind. On the other hand, Qian Guanlian has built up a way from words to metaphysics, with which human beings have to discipline themselves to behaviors-fixed speech events. Qian Guanlian’s rope is an unforgettable contribution to metaphysics.

参考文献

Arens, E. 1994. The Logic of Pragmatic Thinking: From Peirce to Habermas [M]. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
Peirce, C. S. 1955a. The fixation of belief [A]. In J. Buchler (ed.). Philosophical Writings of Peirce [C]. New York: Dover, Inc. 5-22.
Peirce, C. S. 1955b. How to make our ideas clear [A]. In J. Buchler (ed.). Philosophical Writings of Peirce [C]. New York: Dover. 23-41.
Russell, B. 1951. The Problems of Philosophy [M]. London: Oxford University Press.
Scott, G. A. 2002. Does Socrates Have a Method? [C]. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Tarnas, R. 1991. The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas That Have Shaped our Worldview [M]. New York: Ballantine Books.
Whitehead, A. N. 1968. Modes of Thought [M]. New York: The Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. 1978. Process and Reality (Corrected ed.) [M]. New York: The Free Press.
陈嘉映等(译).2008.西方大观念(上、下)[C].北京:华夏出版社.
杜世洪.2013.“语言分析哲学”的一个新动态——布兰顿的意义理论概览[J].自然辩证法研究(9):9-15.
彼得·哈克.2007.哲学(王晓峰、李炳洲、王宇光译)[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版)(5):29-46.
钱冠连.1986.语言冗余信息的容忍度[J].现代外语(3):1-6.
钱冠连.1987.言语功能假信息——兼论Grice“合作原则”的拯救[J].外国语(5):19-23.
钱冠连.1993.美学语言学[M].深圳:海天出版社.
钱冠连.1995.新格赖斯语用机制新在哪里[J].外国语(1):17-24.
钱冠连.1999.哲学轨道上的语言研究[J].外国语(6):9-16.
钱冠连.2001.语用学:中国的位置在哪里?——国内外语用学选题对比研究[J].外语学刊(4):7-16.
钱冠连.2002a.汉语文化语用学(第二版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社.
钱冠连.2002b.语言全息论[M].北京:商务印书馆.
钱冠连.2004.美学语言学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
钱冠连.2005.语言:人类最后的家园[M].北京:商务印书馆.
钱冠连.2007.西语哲在中国:一种可能的发展之路[J].外语学刊(1):1-10.
钱冠连.2008.钱冠连语言学自选集[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
钱冠连.2010.人自称、人被称与物被称[J].外语学刊(2):1-6.
钱冠连.2011.思在昆仑山下——眼光与定力[J].当代外语研究(10):1-4.
钱冠连.2013.论反合及其语言踪迹[J].当代外语研究(1):6-13,19.
塔纳斯.2011.西方思想史(吴象婴等译)[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社.
文章导航

/