语言哲学

从《左传》赋诗活动看“微言相感”的语用功能

展开
  • 广东外语外贸大学,广州,510420
霍永寿,广东外语外贸大学英语语言文化学院教授、硕士生导师。主要研究方向为语言哲学与语用学。电子邮箱:huoys63@aliyun.com

网络出版日期: 2020-07-25

基金资助

*广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“南宗禅学的语言哲学维度”(编号GD13CWW08)和广东省教育厅人文社科项目“禅宗语言哲学研究”(编号2013WYXM0036)的阶段性成果。

Poem Recitations in Zuozhuan and Pragmatic Functions of “Implicit Words and Mental Interaction”

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

摘要

本文以扩展的语用调节论作为基本理论框架,以《左传》的30个赋诗个案作为语料,考察《左传》赋诗活动中“微言相感”的语用特征。研究首先从说话人角度分析了这种语言选择的活动限制、语义特征和语用功能,然后从听话人的角度考察了话语理解(相感)和互动意图确认过程中指称确认、话题关联性确定的语用特性。研究发现,《左传》赋诗作为一种微言形式是说话人在基于周礼的活动限制下所作的语用选择,话语理解(相感)和互动意图的确认涉及到一系列指称转换和话题转换。

本文引用格式

霍永寿 . 从《左传》赋诗活动看“微言相感”的语用功能[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014 , 14(06) : 84 -90 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.06.012

Abstract

Within the extended framework of pragmatics as a linguistic regulation theory, this paper attempts to examine the pragmatic features of 30 poem recitation activities from Zuozhuan, usually characterized as “implicit words and mental interaction”. The research first analyzes the activity constraints, semantic features and pragmatic functions of this activity type from a speaker perspective, and then, from the perspective of the hearer, it investigates the identification of reference and topic relevance involved in activity interactions. The paper concludes that poem recitation as a form of abstruse language is a pragmatic strategy chosen within the li-based activity constraints and its understanding based on a mental and behavioral interaction between the interactants involves a series of referent and topic shifts.

参考文献

Birner, B. J. 2013. Introduction to Pragmatics [M]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G. N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics [M]. London: Longman.
Levinson, S. C. 1979. Activity types and language [J]. Linguistics 17: 365-99.
Thomas, J. A. 2010. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Wittgenstein, L. 2009. Philosophical Investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe trans.) [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
陈彦辉.2007.春秋辞令的审美意义[J].广东外语外贸大学学报(1):19-22.
陈国庆.1983.汉书艺文志注释汇编[C].北京:中华书局.
禇斌杰.1999.诗经全注[M].北京:人民文学出版社.
傅道彬.2004.“诗可以观”——春秋时代的观诗风尚及诗学意义[J].文学评论(5):102-15.
傅道彬.2010.诗可以观:礼乐文化与周代诗学精神[M].北京:中华书局.
霍永寿.2004.弱化与语用调节论:以中医诊谈为个案[M].昆明:云南大学出版社.
李春青.2003.论先秦“赋诗”、“引诗”的文化意蕴[J].齐鲁学刊(6):16-20.
李梦生.2004.左传译注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社.
马银琴.2003.春秋时代赋引风气下《诗》的传播与特点[J].中国诗歌研究(2):157-67.
钱冠连.2005.语言:人类最后的家园[M].北京:商务印书馆.
钱钟书.2002.七缀集[C].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.
沈立岩.2005.先秦语言活动之形态观念及其文学意义[M].北京:人民文学出版社.
杨伯峻.1980.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局.
俞志慧.2005.君子儒与诗教——先秦儒家文学思想考论[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.
赵逵夫.1996.屈原和他的时代[M].北京:人民文学出版社.
周振甫.2006.《诗经》译注[M].南京:凤凰出版传媒集团有限公司.
文章导航

/