文学理论与批评

当代美国后启示录小说创作与研究评析

展开
  • 华中科技大学,武汉,430074
陈爱华,华中科技大学外国语学院副教授。主要研究方向为美国文学与文化。电子邮箱:stellacah@126.com

网络出版日期: 2020-07-25

基金资助

*本文受中央高校基本科研业务费及华中科技大学高水平国际化课程建设项目资助,为HUST项目“当代美国末日题材小说的叙事模式与文化内涵研究”(编号2013WQ002)的研究成果。

A Review of Contemporary American Post-apocalyptic Fiction Writings and Studies

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

摘要

二战后,美国以末世为背景的后启示录小说出现了一派繁荣的景象,每个年代都有大量描写因瘟疫、核战、能源危机、气候灾难、恐怖袭击以及金融危机等因素导致世界末日的小说涌现。虽然良莠不齐,但这方面的经典小说可列出长长的清单。作为一种羽翼丰满的文类,当代美国后启示录小说已呈现出统一或相近的风格与特点,有着独特的叙事模式和文化内涵,是一个很值得我们关注与探讨的文学现象。本文在对当代美国后启示录小说的创作与研究进行梳理和评析的基础上,对其未来的研究进行展望,以期为国内外这方面的研究提供借鉴与启示。

本文引用格式

陈爱华 . 当代美国后启示录小说创作与研究评析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015 , 15(10) : 61 -66 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.10.011

Abstract

After World War Ⅱ, post-apocalyptic fiction has blossomed in America, which is set in a world ruined by a disaster. In each era America produces much post-apocalyptic fiction concerning the existential disasters caused by plague, global nuclear war, energy crisis, climate change, terrorist attack and financial crisis. Although the qualities vary a lot, many of the stories have become the classics. As a full-fledged genre, contemporary American post-apocalyptic fiction has established similar style and features with unique narrative mode and cultural implication worth our attention and studies. This paper attempts to make a thorough analysis of contemporary American post-apocalyptic fiction writings and studies, in hope of pointing out the research direction for further studies in China.

参考文献

Berger, J. 1999. After the End: Representations of Post-apocalypse [M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Brin, D. 1985. The Postman [M]. New York: Bantam Books.
Brinkley, W. 1988. The Last Ship [M]. New York: Viking.
Burns, J. J. 2009. Alternate Endings: The Post-apocalypse in American and British Film and Literature [D]. University Of Arkansas.
Curtis, C. 2010. Postapocalyptic Fiction and the Social Contract: “We’ll Not Go Home Again” [M]. Lanham: Lexington Books.
DuPrau, J. 2003. The City of Ember [M]. New York: Random House.
Forstchen, W. R. 2009. One Second After [M]. New York: Forge.
Frank, P. 1959. Alas, Babylon [M]. New York: Harper Perennial.
Grossman, J. R. 2011. Keeping the Lights on: Post-apocalyptic Narrative, Social Critique, and the Cultural Politics of Emotion [D]. Colorado State University.
Hegland, J.1996. Into the Forest [M]. New York: Bantam Books.
King, S. 1990. The Stand [M]. New York: Doubleday.
LaFaille, G. 1992. Review of On the Beach [J]. Wilson Library Bulletin (10): 131.
McCarthy, C. 2006. The Road [M]. New York: Vintage.
Matheson, R. 1971. I Am Legend [M]. New York: Berkley.
Miller, W. M. 1960. A Canticle for Leibowitz [M]. New York: J. B. Lippincott.
Niven, L. & J. Pournelle.1977. Lucifer’s Hammer [M]. Chicago: Playboy Press.
Rawles, J. W. 2009. Patriots: A Novel of Survival in the Coming Collapse [M]. Berkeley: Ulysses.
Shute, N. 1957. On the Beach [M]. New York: William Morrow.
Stewart, G. R. 2006. Earth Abides [M]. New York: Ballantine Books.
Swartz, Z. C. 2009. Ever Is No Time at All: Theological Issues in Post-apocalyptic Fiction and Cormac McCarthy’s The Road [D]. Georgetown University.
Wagar, W. W. 1982. Terminal Visions: The Literature of Last Things [M]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Wolfe, G. 1983. The remaking of zero: Beginning at the end [A]. In E. S. Rabkin, M. H. Greenberg & J. D. Olander (eds.). The End of the World [C]. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. 1-19.
葛红兵、肖青峰.2008.小说类型理论与批评实践——小说类型学研究论纲[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版)(5):63-74.
威廉·福岑.2012.一秒之后(符瑶译)[M].北京:新星出版社.
文章导航

/