外语教学研究

跨文化接触和大学生英语学习动机行为的内在结构分析

展开
  • 南京航空航天大学,南京,211106
徐智鑫,博士,南京航空航天大学外国语学院副教授、硕士生导师。主要研究方向为应用语言学。电子邮箱:edxuzhixin@126.com

网络出版日期: 2020-07-25

基金资助

*本文系2015年度南京航空航天大学基本科研业务费青年科技创新基金(人文社科类)项目“二语学习者动机自我范式建构与动态系统理论的接口研究与实践”(编号 NR2015017)阶段性研究成果。

The Relationship between Intercultural Contact and L2 Motivated Learning Behaviour among Chinese Learners of English

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

摘要

本文调查非英语专业学生的跨文化接触与动机学习行为之间的结构关系。通过对223名非英语专业学生的问卷调查,基于结构方程模型对假设模型进行了分析。拟合优度标准显示结构模型的信度可以接受。研究发现模型中的各变量对动机学习行为具有显著影响:(1)直接接触对动机学习行为的影响最大,依次为学习态度和接触的重要性认知;和(2)间接接触和工具性通过学习态度对动机学习行为产生间接影响。研究结果能为跨文化交际研究提供一定的理论基础,并对引导学生利用跨文化接触来提高英语学习动机具有指导意义。

本文引用格式

徐智鑫 . 跨文化接触和大学生英语学习动机行为的内在结构分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017 , 17(03) : 59 -64 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.03.011

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between college students' intercultural contact and motivated learning behaviour in the context of China. Through a questionnaire survey among 223 non-English major college students, this study applied structured equation modeling to analyze the proposed model. Based on the goodness-of-fit criteria, the study confirmed the validity of the proposed model. It found that all the variables in the model contributed to motivated learning behaviour significantly. The path coefficients showed that motivated learning behaviour was not only shaped by direct contact, but also by learners' attitudes towards learning English and the perceived importance of contact situations. Indirect contact and instrumentality had indirect influence on motivated learning behaviour mediated by learner's attitudes towards learning English. The results from the study provide important theoretical bases for relevant intercultural research and certain practical reference for improving learners' motivation to learn English through intercultural contact.

参考文献

Allport, G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice [M]. Garden City: Doubleday.
Clément, R. 1980. Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language [A]. In H. M. Giles, W. P. Robinson & P. M. Smith (eds.). Language: Social Psychological Perspectives [C]. Oxford Pergamon.147-154.
Clément, R. & B. G. Kruidenier. 1983. Orientations in second language acquisition: The effects of ethnicity, milieu, and target language on their emergence [J]. Language Learning 33: 273-291.
Clément, R., K. A. Noels & B. Deneault. 2001. Interethnic contact, identity, and psychological adjustment: The mediating and moderating roles of communication [J]. Journal of Social Issues 57: 559-577.
Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition [M]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z & K. Csizér. 2005. The effects of intercultural contact and tourism on language attitudes and language learning motivation [J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24: 1-31.
Dörnyei, Z., K. Csizér & N. Németh. 2006.Motivational Dynamics, Language Attitudes and Language Globalization: A Hungarian Perspective [M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dovidio. J. F., S. L. Gaertner & K. Kawakami. 2003. Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future [J]. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations(1): 5-21.
Edmondson, W. J. Sprachlernbewusst heit und Motivation beim 1997. Fremdsprachenlernen [J]. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen 26: 88-110.
Halualani, R. T. 2008. How do multicultural university students define and make sense of intercultural contact?: A qualitative study[J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations (1): 1-16.
Kormos, J & K. Csizér. 2007. An interview study of inter-cultural contact and its role in language learning in a foreign language environment[J]. System (2): 241-258.
MacIntyre, P. D., R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei & K. A. Noels. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation [J]. The Modern Language Journal 82: 545-562.
Noels, K. A., G. Pon & R. Clément. 1996. Language identity, and adjustment: The role of linguistic self-confidence in the acculturation process[J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15: 246-264.
Pettigrew, T. F. 1986. The intergroup contact hypothesis reconsidered [A]. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (eds.). Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters [C]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 169-198.
Pettigrew, T. F. 1998. Intergroup contact theory [J]. Annual Review of Psychology 49: 65-85.
Pettigrew, T. F. & L .R. Tropp. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90: 751-783.
Stephan, W. G. 1987. The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations[A]. In C. A. Hendrick (ed.). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations[C]. Newbury Park: Sage Publications: 13-33.
胡文仲.1999. 跨文化交际学概论[M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
鲁子问.2002. 试论跨文化教育的实践思路[J]. 教育理论与实践 (4): 1-7.
彭仁忠、吴卫平. 2016. 跨文化能力视域下的中国大学生跨文化接触路径研究[J]. 外语界 (1): 70-78.
徐智鑫、张黎黎. 2013. 大学生二语动机自我体系和动机学习行为的内在结构分析[J]. 西安外国语大学学报 (4): 78-81.
文章导航

/