外语教学研究

英语不及物动词习得与加工研究综述

展开
  • 上海交通大学,上海,200240
朱秀杰,上海交通大学外国语学院在读博士。主要研究方向为二语习得、句法学。电子邮箱: zhuxiujie2006@163.com
王同顺,上海交通大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为二语习得。电子邮箱: tswang@sjtu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2020-07-25

The Review on the Acquisition and Processing of English Intransitive verbs

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

摘要

英语不及物动词的习得和加工是国内外研究的热点。英语不及物动词过度被动的影响因素、英语不及物动词词汇语义特征的习得以及英语不及物动词的在线加工是先前研究的主要内容。但语用因素对英语不及物动词习得和加工的影响以及母语迁移的影响却鲜有研究。同时,Sorace (2000,2001)提出的“不及物动词层级分类”(Split Intransitivity Hierarchy)理论是否适合描述中国学习者对英语不及物动词的习得和加工,尚需充分的实证研究和验证。本文认为深入探究二语学习者对英语不及物动词的在线加工以及验证“接口假说”(Interface Hypothesis)将是未来研究的重点。

本文引用格式

朱秀杰, 王同顺 . 英语不及物动词习得与加工研究综述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017 , 17(03) : 103 -106 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.03.018

参考文献

Agnewa, Z. K., H. van de Koot & C. Mc. Gettigana. 2014. Do sentences with unaccusative verbs involve syntactic movement? Evidence from neuroimaging Language [J]. Cognition and Neuroscience (9): 1035-1045.
Balcom, P. 1997.Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity [J]. Second Language Research 13:1-9.
Chung, T. 2014. Multiple factors in the L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs [J]. International Review of Applied Linguist (1): 59-87.
Dehghan, F. & R. Rezvani. 2016. Transfer at the level of argument structure or morphology: A comparative study of English and Persian unaccusative and unergative verbs [J]. Topics in Linguistics 17:111-124.
Friedmann, N., G. Taranto & L. Shapiro. 2008. The leaf fell (the Leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 355-377.
Ju , M. K. 2000. Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse [J]. SSLA 22: 85-111.
Kondo, T. 2005. Overpassivization in second language acquisition [J]. IRAL 43:129-161.
Lee , J. & K. Thompson. 2011. Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eyetracking study [J]. Aphasiology 25: 813-825.
Montrul, S. 2000. Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition: Toward a modular view of transfer [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 229-273.
Montrul, S. 2001. Causatives and transitivity in L2 English [J]. Language Learning 51: 51-106.
Oshita, H. 2000. What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of “passive” unaccusatives in L2 English [J]. Second Language Research 16: 293-324.
Perlmutter, D. M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis [J]. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4:157-189.
Shetreet, E., N. Friedmann & U. Hadar. 2009. The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2306-2315.
Shin, Jeong-Ah. 2011. Overpassivization errors in Korean college students' English writings [J]. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 27: 255-273.
Sorace, A. & L. Serratrice. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Revisiting the processing vs. representation distinction [J]. The International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 195-210.
Sorace, A. 1993a. Incomplete versus divergent representations of unaccusative grammars of Italian [J]. Second Language Research 9:22-47.
Sorace, A. 1993b. Unaccusativity and auxiliary choice in non-native grammars of Italian and French: Asymmetries and predictable indeterminacy [J]. Journal of French Language Studies (3): 71-93.
Sorace, A. 1995a. Acquiring linking rules and argument structures in a second language: The unaccusative/ unergative distinction [A]. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. S. Smith (eds.). The Current State of Interlanguage [C]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 153-175.
Sorace, A. 1995b. Contraintes se′mantiques sur la syntaxe: L'acquisition de l'inaccusativite' en italien L2 [Semantic constraints on syntax: The acquisition of unaccusativity in L2 Italian] [J]. Acquisition et Inte′raction en Langue Etrange`re (5): 79-113.
Sorace, A. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs [J]. Language 76: 859-890.
Sorace, A. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism” [J]. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism (1): 1-33.
Sorace, A. & F. Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian [J]. Second Language Research 22: 339-365.
Yip, V. 1995. Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zobl, H. 1989. Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition [A]. In S. M. Gass & Schacter (eds.). Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition [C]. New York: Cambridge University Press. 203-221.
蔡金亭.2000.中国学生英语过渡语中的作格动词——一项实证研究[J]. 外语教学与研究(4): 283-289.
蔡金亭.2008.汉-英过渡语中非宾格动词的过度被动化[J]. 外语研究(6): 60-67.
李素枝.2007.英语非宾格动词被动化现象的理论解释[J]. 中州学刊(6): 254-256.
李素枝.2010.二语中的非宾格动词被动泛化及其发生机制[J]. 当代语言学(1):45-52.
朱秀杰、王同顺. 2016.中国学生英语中不及物动词的及物化现象研究[J]. 外语与外语教学(3):67-74.
朱秀杰、王同顺. 2017.中国学生英语不及物动词不对称习得研究[J]. 外语教学与研究(1):85-98.
张达球、乔晓妹.2013.中国英语学习者非宾格结构在线加工研究[J]. 外语界(3): 12-21.
赵晨、葛邵玲.2017.中国学生英语非宾格动词在线加工研究:基于用法的理论视角[J]. 现代外语(1):80-90.
文章导航

/