局部语法视角下的对比研究为探索各类文本的形式-意义特征提供了一种新的路径。之前的研究描述了不同语类和语言使用者群体的评价语言中特征性的意义和功能。然而,这些研究主要以形容词型式作为研究对象,鲜有对名词型式做过专门探索。本文基于Beijing CARE学术文本可比语料库中的中国和西方学者法律子库,对比分析中、西法律学者在使用三个名词评价型式there v-link N of、there v-link N in和n v-link of N时所呈现的高频局部语法型式。结果显示,两组学者评价型式和局部语法型式的使用差异明显:中国学者三个评价型式均显著低频于西方学者;两组学者各有其特征性的局部语法型式,呈现出各自评价语言中特征性的意义和功能。研究为学术话语分析提供了一种新的探索视角,并对学术英语写作教学也有启发意义。
Contrastive studies from a local grammar perspective have provided a new approach to investigating form-meaning features in various texts. Previous studies have revealed the characteristic functions and meanings in the evaluative language of different genres and language users. However, most studies focus on the adjective patterns. No study has yet accounted for the roles of noun patterns in encoding evaluative meanings from a local grammar perspective. This paper, based on the sub-corpora of Law from the Beijing CARE comparable academic corpus, conducts a contrastive investigation into Chinese and Western scholars' high-frequency local grammar patterns associated with three noun evaluative patterns: there v-link N of, there v-link N in, and n v-link of N. The results indicate that the two groups show significant differences in their uses of the evaluative patterns and local grammar patterns: compared with Western scholars, Chinese scholars significantly infrequently use the three evaluative patterns; the two groups both have characteristic local grammar patterns, showing characteristic meanings/functions. This study provides a new exploratory perspective for academic discourse analysis and offers pedagogical implications for academic English writing.
Barnbrook, G. 2002. Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bednarek, M. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse, Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus [M]. London: Continuum.
Bednarek, M. 2007. Local grammar and register variation: Explorations in broadsheet and tabloid newspaper discourse [J]. ELR: The English Language Review 1(1):1-20.
Bhatia, A. & C.N. Candlin. 2008. Interpretation across legal systems and cultures: A critical perspective [A]. In A. Bhatia, C.N. Candlin & J. Engberg (eds.). Legal Discourse across Cultures and Systems [C]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 127-141.
Charles, M. 2003. ‘This mystery...’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4):313-326.
Flowerdew, J. 2010. Use of signalling nouns across L1 and L2 writer corpora [J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(1):36-55.
Francis, G., S. Hunston & E. Manning. 1998. Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives [M]. London: HarperCollins.
Gozdz-Roszkowski, S. & G. Pontrandolfo. 2013. Evaluative patterns in judicial discourse: A corpus-based phraseological perspective on American and Italian criminal judgments [J]. International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse 3(2):9-69.
Hunston, S. 2002. Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation [A]. In R. Reppen,S.M. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (eds.). Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 167-183.
Hunston, S. & G. Francis. 2000. Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hunston, S. & J. Sinclair. 2000. A local grammar of evaluation [A]. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.). Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [C]. New York: Oxford University Press. 74-101.
Hunston, S. & H. Su. in press. Patterns, constructions, and local grammar: A case study of ‘evaluation’ [J]. Applied Linguistics.
Jiang, F. & K. Hyland. 2015. ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing [J]. Discourse Studies 17(5):1-22.
Jiang, F. & K. Hyland. 2016. Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse [J]. Applied Linguistics: doi: 0.1093/applin/amw023.
Mazzi, D. 2010. This argument fails for two reasons: A linguistic analysis of iudicial evaluation strategies in US supreme court judgements [J]. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 23(4):373-385.
Pontrandolfo, G. & S. Goźdź-Roszkowski. 2014. Exploring the local grammar of evaluation: The case of adjectival patterns in American and Italian judicial discourse [J]. Research in Language 12(1):71-91.
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation [M]. Oxford: OUP.
Su, H. 2017. Local grammars of speech acts: An exploratory study [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 111:72-83.
姜峰. 2015. 中美学生论说文的立场名词表达—基于语料库的对比研究[J]. 外语与外语教学(5):8-14.
潘庆云. 2017. 法律语言学[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社.
钱穆. 2011. 中国文化史导论[M]. 北京:九州出版社.
卫乃兴. 2015. 简论局部功能[J]. 外国语文研究(3):12-20.
卫乃兴、张毓. 2016. 概指名词研究:概念框架、分析路径与技术方法[J]. 外语与外语教学(5):1-11.
肖若琳、卫乃兴. 2017. 中西学者学术论文中N that cl-型式的语料库对比研究[J]. 当代外语研究(1):34-41.
张磊、卫乃兴. 2017. 中外法律学者学术论文评价局部语法型式对比研究 [J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(3):10-18.
赵晓临、卫乃兴. 2010. 中国大学生英语书面语中的态度立场表达[J]. 外语研究(1):59-63.
