话语与国家安全
Discourse and National Security
话语已经发展到非传统模态的形式,成为影响国家安全的重要领域。总的说来,它既会影响国家安全与稳定,又能建构和维护国家安全。国外较为关注食品、能源、气候、反恐行动、移民、新兴空间的安全、传统与非传统安全等领域的话语研究;国内则更多地注重话语权、意识形态、国家形象建构、中国文化传播、安全国际关系的构建以及良好国防和军事环境等领域。当前,话语影响国家安全的重要领域有:话语权、国家话语能力、话语的国民心理空间、话语的国民认知空间、话语的主流意识形态、虚拟空间的话语、话语的帝国主义与霸权主义、话语的跨文化交流、国家间的话语战以及话语的时代共同关切等。由于信息技术、互联网以及新兴媒体的发展,微小的话语可以释放巨大的能量,关乎国家的安全,值得人们高度重视。
梁晓波, 肖蓉 . 话语与国家安全[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020 , 20(1) : 77 -90 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.01.010
Discourse has developed into the phase of non-conventional forms, which can bring about serious consequences on national security. Generally speaking, discourse, can not only affect national security, but it can also shape and safeguard national security The studies abroad in this field have focused upon discourse security in food, energy, climate, counter-terrorism, immigration, newly-immerging space, conventional and non-conventional fields, while domestic studies are more interested in such fields as discourse right, national discourse competence, ideology, national image building, communication of Chinese Culture, constructing nice international relationships between countries and ensuring sound environment of national defense and military. Actually, discourse can exert strong impacts upon national security in the following aspects: discourse right, national discourse competence, ideology of the society, psychological domain of people, cognitive domain of people, cyberspace discourse, cross-cultural discourse, verbal war between countries, verbal imperialism and hegemony, and the common concern of the world in discourse. At present, discourse, as a result of the speedy development of information technology, the Internet, and the new media, exertsagreater power than ever before. No one can close their eyes to its effect upon national security.
| [1] | Bala, B. K., E. F. Alias, F. M. Arshad, K. M. Noh & A. H. A. Hadi. 2014. Modelling of food security in Malaysia[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 47: 152-164. |
| [2] | Bhatia, A. 2009. The discourses of terrorism[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 279-289. |
| [3] | Boland, A. 2000. Feeding fears: Competing discourses of interdependency, sovereignty, and China’s food security[J]. Political Geography 19: 55-76. |
| [4] | Bovina, I.B., N. V. Dvoryanchikov & S.V. Budykin. 2014. Shared meanings about information security of children: An exploratory study[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 146: 94-98. |
| [5] | Bueger, C. 2015. What is maritime security?[J]. Marine Policy 53: 159-164. |
| [6] | Zhao, C. & B. Chen. 2014. China’s oil security from the supply Chain perspective: A review[J]. Applied Energy 136: 269-279. |
| [7] | Doty, P. 2015. U.S. homeland security and risk assessment[J]. Government Information Quarterly 32: 342-352. |
| [8] | Dunhama, I. M. & K. Schlosser. 2015. Energy security discourses and environmental protection measures in U.S. federal energy legislation: An introductory exploration[J]. The Extractive Industries and Society 11: 1-9. |
| [9] | Fasold, R. 1990. Sociolinguistics of Language[M]. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| [10] | Germond, B. 2015. The Geopolitical Dimension of Maritime Security[J]. Marine Policy 54: 137-142. |
| [11] | Hart, C. 2013. Argumentation meets adapted cognition: Manipulation in media discourse on immigration[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 59: 200-209. |
| [12] | Isaksen, K. K. & K. Stokke 2014. Changing climate discourse and politics in India: Climate changes challenge and opportunity for diplomacy and development[J]. Geoforum 57: 110-119. |
| [13] | Jaramillo, C. 2015. The multifaceted nature of space security challenges[J]. Space Policy 33: 63-66. |
| [14] | Jaworski, A.& N. Coupland. 1999. The Discourse Reader[M]. London and New York: Routledge. |
| [15] | Kiriyama, E.& Y. Kajikawa.. 2014. A Multi-layered analysis of energy security research and the energy supply process[J]. Applied Energy 123: 415-423. |
| [16] | Kuchler, M.& B. Linnér. 2012. Challenging the food vs. fuel dilemma: Genealogical analysis of the biofuel discourse pursued by international organizations[J]. Food Policy 37(5): 581-588. |
| [17] | Kulkarni, S. S. & H. S. K. Nathan. 2016. The elephant and the tiger: Energy security, geopolitics, and national strategy in China and India’s cross border gas pipelines[J]. Energy Research & Social Science 11: 183-194. |
| [18] | Kuus, M. 2002. Sovereignty for security? The discourse of sovereignty in Estonia[J]. Political Geography 21: 393-412. |
| [19] | Maltsoglou, I., A. Kojakovic, L. E. Rincón, E. Felix, G. Branca, S. Valle, A. Gianvenuti, A. Rossi, A. Thulstrup & H. Thofern. 2015. Combining bioenergy and food security: An approach and rapid appraisal to guide bioenergypolicy formulation[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy 79: 80-95. |
| [20] | Martin, R. 2016. Livelihood security in face of drought: Assessing the vulnerability of pastoral households[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software 75: 414-423. |
| [21] | McDonald, M. 2013. Discourses of climate security[J]. Political Geography 33: 42-51. |
| [22] | McKune, S. L., E. C. Borresen, A. G. Young, T. D. A. Ryley, S.L. Russo, A. D. Camara, M. Coleman & E.P. Ryan. 2015. Climate change through a gendered lens: Examining livestock holder food security[J]. Global Food Security 6: 1-8. |
| [23] | Mihaila, V. 2015. Security branding and national security: Concepts at work[J]. Procedia--Social and Behavioral Sciences 187: 424-428. |
| [24] | Milman, A. & Y. Arsano. 2014. Climate adaptation and development: Contradictions for human security in Gambella, Ethiopia[J]. Global Environmental Change 29: 349-359. |
| [25] | Mohr, J.W., R. Wagner-Pacifici, R. L. Breiger & P. Bogdanov. 2013. Graphing the grammar of motives in national security strategies: Cultural interpretation, automated text analysis and the drama of global politics[J]. Poetics 41: 670-700. |
| [26] | Pantazis, C. & S. Pemberton. 2013. Resisting the advance of the security state: The impact of frameworks of resistance on the UK’S securitisation agenda[J]. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 41: 358-374. |
| [27] | Peoples, C. 2013. A normal space power ? Understanding ‘security’ in Japan’s space policy discourse[J]. Space Policy 29: 135-143. |
| [28] | Popke, J., S. Curtis & D. W. Gamble. 2014. A social justice framing of climate change discourse and policy: Adaptation, resilience and vulnerability in a Jamaican agricultural landscape[J]. Geforum 11: 1-11. |
| [29] | Rajaonarison, H. M. 2014. Food and human security in sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences 20: 377-385. |
| [30] | Rehner, R. & D. McCauley. 2006. Security, justice and the energy crossroads: Assessing the implications of the nuclear phase-out in Germany[J]. Energy Policy 88: 289-298. |
| [31] | Sandole, D. J. D. 2007. Central Asia: Managing the delicate balance between the ‘ciscourse of danger,’ the ‘great game,’ and regional problem solving[J]. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40: 257-267. |
| [32] | Saridakis, G., V. Benson, J. N. Ezingeard & H. Tennakoon. 2016. Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 102: 320-330. |
| [33] | Schifferin, D., D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton. 2001. Introduction[A]. In D. Schifferin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis [C]. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. 1-10. |
| [34] | Schor, J. B. 2014. Climate discourse and economic downturns: The case of the United States, 2008-2013[J]. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 13: 6-20. |
| [35] | Scrase, J.I. & D. G. Ockwell. 2010. The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbonenergy policy: An accessible introduction[J]. Energy Policy 38: 2225-2233. |
| [36] | Strambo, C., M. Nilsson & A. Mnsson. 2015. Coherent or inconsistent? Assessing energy security and climate policy interaction within the European Union[J]. Energy Research and Social Science 8: 1-12. |
| [37] | Tomlinson, I. 2013. Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion: A critical perspective on a key discourse of food security in the UK[J]. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 81-90. |
| [38] | Van Dijk, T. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach[M]. London: Sage Publications. |
| [39] | Warren, E., S. Hawkesworth & C. Knai. 2015. Investigating the association between Urban agriculture and food security, dietary diversity, and nutritional status: A systematic literature review[J]. Food Policy 53: 54-66. |
| [40] | Wilson, M. 2015. Food and nutrition security policies in the Caribbean: Challenging the corporate food regime[J]. Geoforum 5: 1-10. |
| [41] | Su, X.B. 2015. Nontraditional security and China's transnational narcotics control in northern Laos and Myanmar[J]. Political Geography 48: 72-82. |
| [42] | 曹天航. 2015. 当代中国社会主义意识形态话语权建设的路径探究[J]. 江苏社会科学 (5): 130-136. |
| [43] | 曾洪伟. 2013. 学术失语、学术安全与国家文化安全[J]. 中州学刊 (1): 85-94. |
| [44] | 曾润喜、 毛子骏、 徐晓林. 2014. 非传统安全的缘起、话语变迁及治理体系[J]. 电子政务5: 65-71. |
| [45] | 邓显超、 袁亚平. 2012. 从话语转换看中华文化走出去[J]. 长白学刊(4): 144-147. |
| [46] | 郭凤鸣. 2013. 汉英词典编撰与中国文化安全[J]. 思想阵线(4): 125-129. |
| [47] | 韩致宁、 韩健鹏. 2014. 当代西方意识形态话语主导权的新变化[J]. 学术交流(12): 183-188. |
| [48] | 黎海燕、 施萍. 2013. 大众文化视阈下高校思想政治理论课话语主导的价值追寻[J]. 四川省社会主义学院学报(2): 57-59. |
| [49] | 李方明. 2013. 转型期社会主义意识形态话语认同的三重诉求[J]. 吉林工商学院学报(5): 64-66. |
| [50] | 李玲、 黄健荣. 2010. 论当下中国公共治理中的网络话语表达[J]. 探索(4): 71-76. |
| [51] | 李涛、 金强. 2014. 牢牢把握网络涉军舆论的话语权[J]. 政工学刊(7): 58. |
| [52] | 梁晓波. 2013. 国家形象的概念隐喻塑造[J]. 湖北大学学报(社会科学版) (2): 113-117. |
| [53] | 梁晓波、 谭桔玲. 2016. 国防话语研究:一个方兴未艾的领域[J]. 外语研究(6): 5-9. |
| [54] | 梁晓波、 武啸剑、 曾广. 2018. 话语体系与国家安全[J]. 国防科技(3): 17-26. |
| [55] | 琳娜·汉森. 2010. 非传统安全研究的概念和方法:话语分析的启示[J]. 世界经济与政治(3): 89-109. |
| [56] | 刘虎. 2015. 军事话语及其传播研究--以《2010 年中国的国防》白皮书为例[J]. 浙江传媒学院学报(4): 14-19. |
| [57] | 刘旭青. 2014. 当代中国主流意识形态话语权面临的挑战及其建构[J]. 西安政治学院学报(4): 35-37. |
| [58] | 刘永涛. 2002. 话语、权力与“中国威胁”建构[J]. 美国问题研究(第二辑): 342-357. |
| [59] | 刘永涛. 2008. 话语作为(不)安全实践:语言、理论和“邪恶轴心”[J]. 世界经济与政治 (5): 19-25. |
| [60] | 陆恒、 郑易平. 2014. 国际化趋向中国家主流意识形态话语权建构[J]. 湖南社会科学 (5): 42-45. |
| [61] | 骆郁廷、 史姗姗. 2014. 论意识形态安全视域下的文化话语权[J]. 思想理论教育导刊 (4): 66-73. |
| [62] | 茅晓嵩、 阙愚. 2013. 话语权视域下当代中国意识形态安全考察[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(1): 22-24. |
| [63] | 施旭. 2015. 涉中国防学术话语的修辞研究[J]. 外国语文研究(5): 76-85. |
| [64] | 苏娟. 2013. 提升国际文化话语权,维护国家文化安全[J]. 中国与世界(9): 75-78. |
| [65] | 王圣飞、 刘明峥. 2016. 网络国防与网络意识形态斗争话语权[J]. 今传媒(3): 34-35. |
| [66] | 王帏、 翟慧霞. 2014. 网络安全话语权的争夺--从美国起诉中国军人谈起[J]. 对外传播 (8): 43-45. |
| [67] | 王秀敏、 张国启. 2014. 中国特色社会主义意识形态话语权提升的多维审视[J]. 湖北社会科学 (11): 12-15. |
| [68] | 王岩、 王翼. 2016. 论我国意识形态安全对话平台的建设及其重要意义马克思主义理论[J]. 马克思主义研究 (5): 76-84. |
| [69] | 王颖、 姜鑫. 2008. 促进中国获取文化话语权探析[J]. 菏泽学院学报 (1): 103-105. |
| [70] | 杨寄荣、 宋玉静. 2013. 粉丝文化语境下的话语权研究[J]. 辽宁行政教育学院学报 30 (2): 89-92. |
| [71] | 叶美兰、 熊玉文. 2015. 历史叙事与网络文化安全[J]. 江海学刊(5): 172-176, 240. |
| [72] | 张莉. 2015. 科学构建网络安全文化环境, 助网络治理话语权提升[J]. 信息安全与通信保密(5): 74-75. |
| [73] | 张泽一、 郭云. 2014. 当代海外中国学视角下的我国意识形态安全治理[J]. 社会科学家 (7): 34-38. |
| [74] | 赵世举. 2014. 语言是信息的门户和钥匙[EB/OL]. [2014-01-18].光明网理论版 http://theory.gmw.cn/2014-01/18/content_10149387.htm, 2016-07-19. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
