思想与学术

WXDY构式非直陈义的句法生成理据

展开
  • 巴斯大学,巴斯,BA2 7AY
杨朝军,河南大学外语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为功能语言学、认知语言学及翻译理论等。电子邮箱: zhongshangyang@126.com|杨更前,英国巴斯大学电子与电气工程系访问学者。主要研究方向为脑机接口(BCI)、计算语言学及语言认知等。电子邮箱: gy299@bath.ac.uk

网络出版日期: 2021-09-30

基金资助

*国家社科基金项目“基于语料库的非人称构式认知研究”的阶段性成果(16BYY180)

The Syntactic Mechanism of the Indirect Meaning of the WXDY Construction

Expand

Online published: 2021-09-30

摘要

前人关于WXDY构式的研究更多地关注了该语言形式非直陈义的分析,忽略了其作为一个正常的组合结构的直陈意义,没有厘清该构式直陈义与非直陈义之间的过渡关系。本文利用角色与参照语法、认知语言学的框盒图分析和配价语法的分析方法,从不同侧面揭示了WXDY构式非直陈义形成的内在机制,指出每个构式都会有一个前原型构式,在此基础上可以衍生出一致式构式(原型构式)、变异构式(非原型构式)等,相对应地表征原型义、直陈义和非直陈义,每一个后者都是在前者的基础上产生的,即其间存在一个“原型义-直陈义-非直陈义”的语用认知过程,非直陈义的产生是构式与成分之间相互压制、凸显、传承、整合及语用选择的结果。

本文引用格式

杨朝军, 杨更前 . WXDY构式非直陈义的句法生成理据[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021 , 21(3) : 71 -83 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.03.008

参考文献

[1] Croft W. 2003. Typology and Universals (2nd edition) [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2] Fillmore, C., P. Kay, L. Michaelis, & I. Sag. 2003. Construction Grammar[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[3] Fillmore, C., P. Kay, & M. O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone[J]. Language (64):501-538.
[4] Goldberg, A.E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[5] Goldberg A. 2006. Constructions at Work[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[6] Gregory, M. L.,& A. M. Laura. 2001. Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional opposition revisited[J]. Journal of Pragmatics (33):1665-1706.
[7] Hu X. 2018. Encoding Events: Functional Structure and Variation[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[8] Kay, P,& C. J. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The “What’s X doing Y’ construction[J]. Language (1):1-33.
[9] Langacker R. W. 1982. Review[J]. Language (2):399-412.
[10] Langacker R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar(Vol.1)[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[11] Langacker R. W. 1991. Concept, Image and Symbol[M]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[12] Langacker R. W. 1999/2000. Grammar and Conceptualization[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
[13] Lieber R. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14] Marantz A. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants[J]. Lingua (2):152-168.
[15] Michaelis L.A. 2004. Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion[J]. Cognitive Linguistics (1):1-67.
[16] van Valin. 1993. Advances in Role and Reference Grammar[M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[17] van Valin. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[18] Verschueren J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics[M]. London: Edward Arnold.
[19] Wiseth K. 2012. RRG meets the WXDY construction[J]. Linguistics 202:1-14.
[20] 王寅. 2011a. 框盒图:构式语法的形式化方案[J]. 外国语文 (3):42-47.
[21] 王寅. 2011b. 构式语法研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
文章导航

/