网络出版日期: 2021-10-25
Wirkungsgeschichte and Wirkliche Historie: Historical Perceptions of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Michel Foucault
韦丁文 . 效果历史与真史——伽达默尔与福柯的效果史观辨析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020 , 20(4) : 118 -125 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.04.012
| [1] | Dreyfus, H. L. & P. Rabinow. 1983. Michael Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (2ndedn.)[M]. The University of Chicago Press. |
| [2] | Fairfield, P. 2011. The hermeneutics of suspicion and recovery and the difference it does not make: Gadamer and Foucault[A]. In A. Wierciński (ed.). Gadamer’s Hermeneutics and the Art of Conversation[C]. Berlin: Lit Verlag.423-438. |
| [3] | Foucault, M. 1984. Nietzsche, genealogy, history [A]. In P. Rabinow (ed.). The Foucault Reader[C]. New York: Pantheon Books.76-100. |
| [4] | Vandevelde, P. 2018. Dialogue or drama? The event of interpretation in Gadamer and Foucault [A]. In P. Fairfield & G. Saulius (eds.). Relational Hermeneutics: Essays in Comparative Philosophy [C]. London: Bloomsbury Academic.131-148. |
| [5] | Wickham, G. 2000. Foucault and Gadamer: Like apples and oranges passing in the night[J]. Chicago-Kent Law Review 76(2):913-943. |
| [6] | 汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔. 1999. 真理与方法(洪汉鼎译)[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社. |
| [7] | 米歇尔·福柯. 2001. 尼采·谱系学·历史学(苏力译)[A].尼采的幽灵--西方后现代语境中的尼采(汪民安、陈永国编)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. |
| [8] | 米歇尔·福柯. 2002. 词与物--人文科学考古学(莫伟民译)[M]. 上海: 上海三联书店. |
| [9] | 米歇尔·福柯. 2003a. 疯癫与文明:理性时代疯癫史(刘北成、杨远婴译)[M]. 上海: 三联书店. |
| [10] | 米歇尔·福柯. 2003b. 规训与惩罚(刘北成、杨远婴译)[M]. 上海: 三联书店. |
| [11] | 米歇尔·福柯. 2003c. 知识考古学(谢强、马月译)[M]. 上海: 三联书店. |
| [12] | 莫伟民. 2001. 论福柯非历史主义的历史观[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版) (3):76-82. |
| [13] | 赵卫国. 2005. 伽达默尔诠释学理论的困境分析[J]. 西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)(3):15-19. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
