思想与学术

影响听力理解任务难度感知的语篇特征

展开
  • 上海交通大学,上海,200240

网络出版日期: 2021-12-31

基金资助

* 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“多模态学术讲演测试中输入与输出模式对听力理解的影响研究”(19YJA740041)

Effects of Input Features on Difficulty Perception of Authentic Listening Comprehension Tasks

Expand

Online published: 2021-12-31

摘要

影响听力任务难度的任务特征包括语篇因素、活动因素、学习者因素,其中语篇因素相对恒定,是决定任务难度的最主要因素。本研究应用文本分析在线工具,基于大量的新闻原声音频,探究影响学习者真实听力理解任务难度感知的主要语篇特征,研究量化英语新闻短消息和长特写文本的词汇、句法、篇章连贯和语义特征,实时测试获取学生对理解语篇的难度评价,进行相关分析和多元回归分析检验。结果显示:近20项语篇特征对新闻难度有显著影响,其中短消息理解难易度主要取决于语篇的数字密度、Flesch易读度、名词词组密度、语速和学术词汇比例,而长特写主要取决于Coh-Metrix二语易读度和邻句前指重叠比例。两种新闻体裁的难度影响因素有重合也有差异,证实了交际任务类型在听力任务难度研究中的核心地位。

本文引用格式

潘之欣, 樊雪 . 影响听力理解任务难度感知的语篇特征[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021 , 21(6) : 119 -131 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.06.012

参考文献

[1] Bachman L. F. 2002. Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment[J]. Language Testing 19: 453-476.
[2] Blau E. K. 1990. The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension[J]. TESOL Quarterly 24 (4): 746-53.
[3] Brindley, G. & H. Slatyer. 2002. Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment[J]. Language Testing 19: 369-394.
[4] Brunfaut, T. & A. Revesz. 2015. The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening[J]. TESOL Quarterly 49: 141-168.
[5] Buck, G. & K. Tasuoka. 1998. Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: Examining attributes of a free response listening test[J]. Language Testing 15: 119-157.
[6] Cervantes, R. & G. Gainer. 1992. The effects of syntactic simplification and repetition on listening comprehension[J]. TESOL Quarterly 26: 767-70.
[7] Cutler, A. & D. M. Carter. 1987. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary[J]. Computer Speech and Language 2: 133-42.
[8] Ellis R. 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9] Freedle, R. & I. Kostin. 1999. Does the text matter in a multiple-choice test of comprehension? The case for the construct validity of TOEFL's minitalks[J]. Language Testing 16(1): 2-32.
[10] Hu Y. H. 2006. An investigation into the task features affecting EFL listening comprehension test performance[J]. Asian EFL Journal Quarterly 8(2): 33-54.
[11] Graesser A. C., D. S. McNamara, M. Louwerse, M. Louwerse & Z. Cai. 2004. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language [J]. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36(2): 193-201.
[12] Graesser A. C., D. S. McNamara & J. M. Kulikowich. 2011. Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics[J]. Educational Researcher 40(5): 223-234.
[13] Kostin I. 2004. Exploring item characteristics that are related to the difficulty of TOEFL dialogue items[R]. Princeton, U.S.: ETS Research Report.
[14] Lu X. F. 2010. Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing[J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 474-496.
[15] Major R. C., S. M. Fitzmaurice, F. Bunta & C. Balasubramanian. 2005. Testing the effects of regional, ethnic, and international dialects of English on listening comprehension[J]. Language Learning 55(1): 37-69.
[16] McNamara D. S., M. M. Louwerse, P. M. McCarthy & A. C. Graesser. 2010. Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion[J]. Discourse Processes 47: 292-330.
[17] Nissan S., F. DeVincenzi & K. L. Tang. 1996. An analysis of factors affecting the difficulty of dialogue items in TOEFL listening comprehension[R]. Princeton, U.S.: ETS.
[18] Ortega L. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing[J]. Applied Linguistics 24: 492-518.
[19] Paquot M. 2010. Academic Vocabulary in Learner Writing: From Extraction to Analysis[M]. London: Continuum.
[20] Quirk R., S. Creenbaum G Leech & J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[M]. London: Longman World Publishing Corporation.
[21] Renandya, W. & T. Farrell. 2011. Teacher, the tape is too fast! Extensive listening in ELT[J]. ELT Journal 65 (1) : 52-59.
[22] Rixon S. 1986. Developing Listening Skills[M]. London: Macmillan.
[23] Revesz, A. & T. Brunfaut. 2013. Text Characteristics of task input and difficulty in second language comprehension[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35: 31-65.
[24] Rupp A. A., P. Garcia & J. Jamieson. 2001. Combining multiple regression and CART to understand difficulty in second language reading and listening comprehension test items[J]. International Journal of Testing 1(3-4): 185-216.
[25] Skehan P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[26] Teng H. C. 2001. Impact of speech modification on EFL listening[R]. Kitakyushu, Japan: Proceedings of the Third Pan-Asian Conference (PAC3) at JALT.
[27] Yanagawa, K. & A. Green. 2008. To show or not to show: The effects of item stems and answer options on performance on a multiple-choice listening comprehension test[J]. System 36: 107-22.
[28] 何莲珍、 陈大建、 闵尚超. 2018. 英语听力测试中测试方法对任务难度的影响研究[J]. 现代外语 41(1):43-54.
[29] 桂诗春. 2000. 新编心理语言学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[30] 孙蓝、 许秋敏、 赵新红. 2006. 二语词汇提取模式效应研究[J]. 中国外语 11(3):45-53.
文章导航

/