网络出版日期: 2022-01-27
The Bottleneck of Linguistic Interface Study and Its Way out in the Context of New Liberal Arts
近20年来,基于语用学发展而来的语言界面研究取得了长足的发展,但是语义-语用界面论和语境决定论的理论分歧使语言界面研究陷入瓶颈。本文根据“新文科”要求提出了新型语言界面观,为瓶颈的解决提供了新的路径。“语言学+哲学”的交叉了通过引入唯物辩证法可以摆脱“以偏概全”的语言哲学思潮,据此本文提出规约和语境是对立统一体,基于规约和语境制衡的关系,默认意义分为结构默认、社会文化默认和情景默认,这三种默认意义的语境依赖程度依次增强。“语言学+计算科学”和“语言学+实验科学”的交叉可验证“语言学+哲学”的交叉研究提出的理论假设,这一研究方法为构建本土化语用学提供了学科交叉的新方向。
张延飞, 刘洪东 . 新文科背景下语言界面研究瓶颈的解决路径[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022 , 22(1) : 103 -110 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.01.008
In the past two decades, linguistic interface study informed by pragmatics has made great progress, but, due to the theoretical controversies between the semantics-pragmatics interface view and the context-determined view, it has hit a bottleneck. This article proposes a new linguistic interface view in the context of New Liberal Arts, which provides a way out. By introducing materialist dialectics, the cross-disciplinary research between linguistics and philosophy undoes the view of “taking a part for the whole” in the Western thought and proposes that convention and context are the unity of opposites, based on which default meaning is divided into structural default, socio-cultural default and situational default, and their context-dependence degrees increase in turn. “Linguistics+Computational Science” and “Linguistics+Experimental Science” deploy Chinese facts to verify “Linguistics+Philosophy”, facilitating the localization of pragmatics incorporating Chinese elements.
Key words： linguistic interface; New Liberal Arts; default meaning; context; convention
| [1] | Austin J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [2] | Bach K. 1994. Conversational implicature[J]. Mind & Language 9(2):124-162. |
| [3] | Carston R. 2004. Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature[A]. In C. Bianchi (ed.). The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction[C]. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 65-100. |
| [4] | Carston R. 2009. The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication[J]. International Review of Pragmatics 1:35-62. |
| [5] | Giora, R.& S. Givoni. 2015. Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm[J]. Metaphor and Symbol 30:290-313. |
| [6] | Grice P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
| [7] | Jaszczolt K. 2005. Default Semantics. Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [8] | Levinson S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press. |
| [9] | Noveck I. 2018. Experimental Pragmatics: The Making of a Cognitive Science[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [10] | Noveck, I.& D. Sperber. 2004. Experimental Pragmatics[M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| [11] | Recanati F. 2004. Literal Meaning[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [12] | Saussure F. 1916. Course in General Linguistics[M]. London: Duckworth. |
| [13] | Searle J 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [14] | Sperber, D.& D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[M]. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| [15] | Stainton R. 2004. The Pragmatics of Non-sentences[A]. In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.). The Handbook of Pragmatics[C]. Oxford: Blackwell. 266-287. |
| [16] | Wittgenstein L. 1953. The Philosophical Investigations[M]. New York: Macmillan. |
| [17] | 樊丽明. 2020. “新文科”:时代需求与建设重点[J]. 中国大学教学 (5) : 4-8. |
| [18] | 胡开宝. 2020. 新文科视域下外语学科的建设与发展——理念与路径[J]. 中国外语 (3):14-19. |
| [19] | 胡壮麟. 2002. 语境研究的多元化[J]. 外语教学与研究 (5):161-166. |
| [20] | 张绍杰. 2008. 一般会话含义的“两面性”与含义推导模式问题[J]. 外语教学与研究 (3) :196- 203,241. |
| [21] | 张绍杰. 2020. 语言界面观与外语教学理念创新[J]. 现代外语 (5) : 612-619. |
| [22] | 张延飞. 2018. 默认意义新解:语法-语用互动视角[J]. 外语与外语教学 (6) : 36-41. |
| [23] | 张延飞、 张绍杰. 2009. 后格赖斯语用学:含义默认解释模式综观[J]. 外语与外语教学 (8) : 1-6. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
