语言学与应用语言学

读写双链二语写作教学模式:理据与实践

展开
  • 南京邮电大学,南京,210042; 上海外国语大学,上海,200083; 上海海事大学,上海,201306
臧庆,南京邮电大学外语学院副教授。主要研究方向为应用语言学;|徐海铭,上海外国语大学英语学院教授。主要研究方向为写作、口译、研究方法。电子邮箱:xuhaiming@shisu.edu.cn;|管晶晶,博士,上海海事大学外语学院讲师。主要研究方向为应用语言学。

网络出版日期: 2022-12-02

The Reading & Writing Dual-Chained Model of L2 Writing Instruction: Its Rationale and Practice

Expand

Online published: 2022-12-02

摘要

本文通过二语课堂教学实践阐述“读写双链二语写作教学模式”的理据。首先,二语写作教师通过精讲遴选的文本,引导学生进行“感知—加工—再加工—内化”文本,借此熟悉好作文标准,同时引导学生独立地深度加工文本,从而获得自我发现,这就是“感知—加工—再加工—内化文本阅读链”的理据。其次,教师检查学生产出文本,监控其写作特征与质量,给出诊断性反馈让其修改,学生参照多次反馈做多次修改,深化对原文的感知,这就是“产出—监控—反馈—修改/再修改写作链”的理据。这一探索性“读写双链二语写作教学模式”可以有效提高学生的二语读写水平。

本文引用格式

臧庆, 徐海铭, 管晶晶 . 读写双链二语写作教学模式:理据与实践[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022 , 22(6) : 86 -94 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.06.011

Abstract

This paper succinctly explicates the rationale behind an L2 writing instruction model practiced in classroom. Firstly, the Reading Chain consists of such links as student initial text perceiving, teacher-guided preliminary processing and student-regulated self-discovery prior to deeper text processing. Whereas, the Writing Chain comprises such links as student producing and teacher monitoring of texts, relevant types of feedback given to student writers, subsequent student revision and further feedback-referenced revision. Being exploratory in nature, this model has proven to enable student writers to improve their L2 writing competence.

参考文献

[1] Anwaruddin S. 2019. Knowledge Mobilization in TESOL: Connecting Research and Practice[M]. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
[2] Bygate M. 2020. Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real world project[J]. Language Teaching 53:275-288.
[3] Deiglmayr A. 2018. Instructional scaffolds for learning from formative peer assessment: Effects of core task, peer feedback, and dialogue[J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33(1): 185-198.
[4] Ferris D. R. 2010. Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA:Intersections and Practical Applications[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:181-201.
[5] Gopen G. 2004. Expectations: Teaching from Readers Perspective[M]. London: Pearson Education.
[6] Hyland K. & F. Hyland. (eds.). 2006. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[7] Rose H. 2020. Dismantling the Ivory Tower in TESOL: A renewed call for teaching-informed research[J]. TESOL Quarterly 54(1): 895-905.
[8] Skaham P. 1998. Cognitive Approach to Language Learning[M]. Oxford & New Youk: Oxford University.
[9] Truscott J. & A. Y. P. Hsu. 2008. Error correction, revision, and learning[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 255-272.
[10] 李竞. 2021. 同伴写作反馈的信念和实践跟踪研究[D]. 上海: 上海外国语大学.
[11] 文秋芳. 2015. 构建产出导向法理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究 (4):547-559.
[12] 文秋芳. 2020. 产出导向法:中国外语教育理论创新探索[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社.
文章导航

/