语言学与应用语言学

理想化认知模型下的语用模糊理解机制

展开
  • 湖南第一师范学院,长沙,410205
康响英,湖南第一师范学院外国语学院教授。主要研究方向为模糊语言学、英美文学。电子邮箱:1292449039@qq.com;|欧丽萍,湖南第一师范学院外国语学院讲师。主要研究方向为语言学、英美文学;|罗奕,湖南第一师范学院外国语学院学生。

网络出版日期: 2023-07-31

基金资助

*2022年度湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目“语用模糊理解与移情机制研究”(编号22YBA257)

On the Comprehension Mechanism of Pragmatic Fuzziness Based on an Idealized Cognitive Model (ICM)

Expand

Online published: 2023-07-31

摘要

学界基于认知语言学理论的语用模糊理解机制尚局限在关联理论、顺应理论与空间复合理论之中,新意不足,且已有研究多倾向于从说话人角度展开。本文从听话人视角探讨语用模糊理解机制,并提出理想化认知模型对该机制具有较强的阐释力。在同一语言社团里,每类话语交际都具有程序化的认知模型,能够产生原型效应,为人们认识世界提供一个简约的、理想化的认知框架。听话人察觉话语与语境冲突后,会聚焦于话语反常点,还原理想的常规话语认知模型,并在回溯推理过程中,在比对它与模糊话语差别的基础上补全受损的最佳关联,从而找出说话人意欲隐藏的真正意图,大大缩小了说话人意图的检索范围,降低解读说话人意欲隐藏的意图的难度。本研究旨在提高人们的语用能力,为语用模糊理解机制的形式化提供学理支撑。

本文引用格式

康响英, 欧丽萍, 罗奕 . 理想化认知模型下的语用模糊理解机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2023 , 23(3) : 131 -140 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.03.015

Abstract

The previous study of the comprehension mechanism of pragmatic fuzziness based on cognitive linguistics is limited to relevance theory, adaptation theory, and spatial compounding theory and tends to be carried out from the perspective of the speaker, which lacks novelty. This paper explores the mechanism from the perspective of the addressee and puts forward the theory of the idealized cognitive model (ICM), which has strong explanatory power for this mechanism. The reason is that each type of discourse communication in the same language community has a programmed ICM, which can produce a prototype effect and provide a simple and ideal cognitive framework for people to understand the world. After the addressee perceives the conflict between the utterance and the context, he focuses on the abnormal points of the utterance, restores the ideal conventional utterance ICM, and in the process of backtracking reasoning, compares it with the difference between the fuzzy utterance and completes the damaged optimal relevance, to find out the real intention of the speaker. This greatly reduces the retrieval scope of locating the speaker’s intention and reduces the difficulty of interpreting the speaker’s hidden intention. The research aims to improve people’s pragmatic competence and provide theoretical support for the formalization of pragmatic fuzzy discourse understanding.

参考文献

[1] Brown, P.& S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2] Coupland, N.& H. Giles. 1988. The Communicative Contexts of Accommodation[J]. Language and Communication 3(4):175-182.
[3] Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Evens, V.& M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
[5] Fairclough, N. 1999. Language and Power[M]. London & New York: Longman.
[6] Giles, H. P.M. Smith. 1979. Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence [A]. In H. Giles & R. St Clair (eds.). Language and Social Psychology[C]. Oxford: Blackwell.45-65.
[7] Hamers, J. F.& M. Blanc. 2000. Bilingualist and Bilingualism[M]. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.
[8] Lakoff, G. 1987. Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[9] Pearsall, J,. P.Hanks & C. Soanes. 2007. 新牛津英汉双解大词典[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[10] Searle. J. R. 1967/2001. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[11] Scotton, C. M. & W. Ury. 1977. Bilingual strategies: The social function of code-switching[J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language (13):7-19.
[12] Sperber, D.& D. Wilson. 1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[13] Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance:Communication and Cognition(2nd edn.)[M]. Oxford:Blackwell.
[14] 康响英. 2020. 语用模糊理解的影响因素研究[J]. 湖南第一师范学院学报20(5):123-128.
[15] 刘正光. 2001. 言语适应理论研究述评[J]. 语言文字应用(2):57-64.
[16] 诺斯罗普·弗莱. 2006. 批评的剖析(陈慧、袁宪军、吴伟仁译)[M]. 天津: 百花文艺出版社.
[17] 钱永红. 2015. 广告模糊语误导的社会心理机制:批评语用分析[J]. 当代外语研究(9):44- 48,77-78.
[18] 冉永平. 2006. 语用学:现象与分析[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[19] 邵士洋、 刘宇红. 2008. 论社会距离和语言礼貌级别的交互作用[J]. 乐山师范学院学报(1):76-78,85.
[20] 栗进英、 李经纬. 2010. 言语适应理论与身份研究述评[J]. 外语教学(6):38-41.
[21] 王念婷. 2012. 基于原型论与范畴化下的认知模型分析[J]. 文学界(理论版) (6):78-79.
[22] 王文斌. 2014. 论理想化认知模型的本质、结构类型及其内在关系[J]. 外语教学理论与实践(3):9-15,94.
[23] 王寅. 2005. 二山之石,必可攻玉——认知语言学中的ICM理论在语义分析中的应用[J]. 中国外语(2):32-36.
[24] 王寅. 2006. 解读语言形成的认知过程——七论语言的体验性:详解基于体验的认知过程[J]. 四川外语学院学报(6):53-59.
[25] 魏在江. 2006. 从外交语言看语用含糊[J]. 外语学刊(2):45-51.
[26] 徐盛桓. 1994. 论意向含意——新格赖斯会话含意理论系列研究之七[J]. 外语研究(1):4-11.
[27] 张汉熙、 王立礼. 2017. 高级英语1(第三版)[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社.
文章导航

/