语言学

基于体认哲学观的感知世界、理思世界和语言世界三分构想

展开
  • 上海立信会计金融学院,上海,201209
邵军航,博士,上海立信会计金融学院教授。主要研究方向为认知语言学、英汉翻译。电子邮箱:shaojh1231@163.com

网络出版日期: 2024-03-11

基金资助

* 2023年上海市重点课程“语言学导论”

Assumption of the Division between the Perceived World, Rationally-conceived World and Linguistically-encoded World from the Perspective of Embodied-cognitive Philosophy

Expand

Online published: 2024-03-11

摘要

认知语言学认为语言不是对外部世界的镜像反映,而是要经过人类大脑的认知加工。因此人类知识可以划分为三个既相互区别又互为关联的部分,即感知世界、理思世界和语言世界。感知世界由感觉器官所能够感知的事物构成,具有层次性、可塑性、近身性、生动性、违实性等特点。理思世界由概念、意象图式、概念域等构成,具有时空观念模糊性、高度抽象性、立体结构性、工具性、突生进化性特点。语言世界是理思世界的外显,由单词码化、编码模式选择、图形-背景组配、情景适配等构成,具有符号性、线性特点。

本文引用格式

邵军航 . 基于体认哲学观的感知世界、理思世界和语言世界三分构想[J]. 当代外语研究, 2024 , 24(1) : 81 -88 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.01.006

Abstract

Cognitive linguistics holds that language is not the direct reflection of the external world, but rather undergoes cognitive processing by the human brain. Therefore, human knowledge can be divided into three distinct yet interrelated parts, namely the Perceived World, the Rationally-thought World, and the Linguistically-encoded World. The Perceived-World is composed of things that sensory organs can perceive, with characteristics such as hierarchy, plasticity, closeness, vividness, and unreality. The Rationally-thought World is composed of concepts, image schema, conceptual domains, etc. This world has the characteristics of being fussy in spatial and temporal concepts, highly abstract, three-dimensional, instrumental, and emergently evolved. The Linguistically-encoded World is the manifestation of the Rationally-thought World, consisting of word encoding, selection of encoding mode, figure-ground alignment, situational adaptation, etc., with symbolic and linear characteristics.

参考文献

[1] Croft. W. & A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2] Fauconnier G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think[M]. New York: Basic Books.
[3] Fauconnier G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Goldberg A. E. 2007. 构式:论元结构的构式语法研究(吴海波译)[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[5] Lakoff G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
[6] Langacker R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol 1): Theoretical Prerequisites[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[7] Levinson S. C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Talmy. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems[M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[9] 黄希庭. 2007. 心理学导论[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[10] 彭聃龄. 2004. 普通心理学[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[11] 彭聃龄. 2014. 普通心理学[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[12] 邵军航. 2009. 空间语言的要素及其对诗词风格的作用[J]. 外语研究(6): 21-29.
[13] 邵军航、 赵德全、严淑, 等. 2020. 新编英语词汇学教程[M]. 上海: 立信会计出版社.
[14] 王寅. 2013. 体验哲学和认知语言学为语言哲学之延续——二十九论语言的体认性[J]. 中国外语(1):18-25.
[15] 王寅. 2014. 后现代哲学视野下的体认语言学[J]. 外国语文(6):61-68.
[16] 王寅. 2019. 体认语言学之语言哲学分析[J]. 外语研究(3):26-30.
[17] 王寅. 2021. 体认语言学的理论与实践[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报(3):3-15.
[18] 王寅. 2022. 认知语言学和体认语言学可望再度领先[J]. 当代外语研究(2):83-92.
文章导航

/