网络出版日期: 2025-03-20
基金资助
*国家社科基金一般项目“jl0”、广东省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“jl1”和广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目“jl2”的阶段性成果
Developing an Effectiveness Scale for Ideological and Political Education in College English Courses Based on Perezhivanie
大学英语课程思政教学理念推行已逾四年,却一直缺乏有效的教学评估量表。现有量表多源自非英语学科的宏观教育领域,难以契合大学英语课程思政教学需求,无法提供有效指导,开发适用评估工具迫在眉睫。本研究依据《高等院校课程思政建设指导纲要》和《大学英语教学指南》两个重要文件,引入社会文化理论中的情感体验(perezhivanie)框架,构建英语课程思政教学有效性量表。在样本 1(N = 500)中通过探索性因子分析形成含 33 个题项的量表,在样本 2(N = 504)中运用验证性因子分析验证了四因子结构的良好拟合性,确认量表内部一致性及跨性别测量一致性。本研究为大学英语课程思政教学改革提供科学评估工具,为后续研究提供了有益参考。
秦丽莉 , 王永亮 , 吴韩伟 . 基于情感体验维度构建大学英语课程思政教学有效性评估量表[J]. 当代外语研究, 2025 , 25(2) : 171 -182 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.02.015
The teaching concept of ideological and political education in college English courses has been promoted for more than four years, yet there has been a lack of an effective teaching evaluation scale. Most of the existing scales are derived from the macroscopic educational fields of non - English disciplines, which are difficult to meet the teaching needs of ideological and political education in college English courses and fail to provide effective guidance. Therefore, the development of an applicable evaluation scale is urgently needed. Based on two important documents, namely “The Guiding Outline for the Construction of Ideological and Political Education in Institutions of Higher Learning” and “The College English Teaching Guide”, this study utilizes the emotional experience (perezhivanie) framework in sociocultural theory to construct a scale for the effectiveness of ideological and political education in English courses. In Sample 1 (N = 500), an exploratory factor analysis was used to form a scale with 33 items. In Sample 2 (N = 504), a confirmatory factor analysis was employed to verify the good fit of the four - factor structure, and confirm the internal consistency of the scale and the measurement consistency across genders. This study provides a scientific measure for the teaching reform of ideological and political education in college English courses and offers a valuable reference for subsequent research.
| [1] | Boateng, G. O., T. B. Neilands & E. A. Frongillo, et al. 2018. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer[J]. Frontiers in Public Health 6: 149. |
| [2] | Carpenter, S. 2018. Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers[J]. Communication Methods and Measures 12(1): 25-44. |
| [3] | Cheung, G. W. & R. B. Rensvold. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance[J]. Structural Equation Modeling 9(2): 233-255. |
| [4] | Fabrigar, L. R., D. T. Wegener & R. C. MacCallum, et al. 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research[J]. Psychological Methods 4(3): 272-299. |
| [5] | Golombek, P. & M. Doran. 2014. Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education 39: 102-111. |
| [6] | Harrington, D. 2009. Assessing confirmatory factor analysis: model fit and model revision[J]. Confirmatory Factor Analysis 52(3): 1-11. |
| [7] | Hu, L.-t. & P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J]. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1): 1-55. |
| [8] | Qin, L., L. Yao & Y. Jin. 2022. Unpacking the interaction between foreign language learners’ emotion, cognition, and activity in the flipped classroom in higher education: A perezhivanie perspective[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 33: 889-900. |
| [9] | Veresov, N., A. Filipi & C. Davidson. 2023. Cultural-Historical theory and analysis[A]. In A. Filipi, C. Davidson & N. Veresov(eds.). Conversation Analysis and a Cultural-Historical Approach Comparing Research Perspectives on Children’s Storytelling [C]. Switzerland: AG. Springer. 89-132. |
| [10] | Viladrich, C., A. Angulo-Brunet & E. Doval. 2017. A Journey around Alpha and Omega to estimate internal consistency reliability[J]. Anales de Psicología 33( 3): 755-782. |
| [11] | 富海鹰、 杨成、 李丹妮, 等. 2021. “三全育人”视角下工科课程思政实践探究[J]. 高等工程教育研究(5): 94-99,165. |
| [12] | 龚丽萍. 2022. 体育教师课程思政能力模型构建[J]. 成都体育学院学报(5): 111-116,136. |
| [13] | 秦丽莉、何艳华、 欧阳西贝. 2019. 新手教师情感对认知发展影响的叙事研究[J]. 现代外语(6): 818-829. |
| [14] | 秦丽莉、 赵迎旭、 高洋, 等. 2023. 社会文化理论指导的大学英语课程思政教学有效性研究路径[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(1): 78-86,161. |
| [15] | 王晓慧、 刘晓峰. 2023. 高校外语教师课程思政胜任力: 多维结构与测量[J]. 外语研究40(2): 55-61,73,112. |
| [16] | 王永亮、 吴韩伟、 Derakhshan Ali, 等. 2024. 生成式AI辅助中国大学英语学习者态度量表的开发与检验[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报(6): 30-45. |
| [17] | 文秋芳. 2021. 大学外语课程思政的内涵和实施框架[J]. 中国外语(2): 47-52. |
| [18] | 谢鑫、 张红霞. 2022. 大学何以使学生立志——高校教育支持对本科生人生目标感的影响研究[J]. 中国高教研究(1): 76-82. |
| [19] | 杨晓春、 张子石. 2022. 数字化转型背景下大学外语课程思政的内涵、问题与实践路径[J]. 中国电化教育(11): 75-81. |
| [20] | 叶飞、尹珺瑶、 田鹏. 2022. 研究生课程思政建设要素模型建构及实证分析——基于SECI理论的混合研究[J]. 研究生教育研究(4): 29-34. |
| [21] | 张莲、 左丹云. 2023. 叙事视角下高校外语教师过往情感体验对专业身份认同建构的调节研究[J]. 外语教学(1): 46-53. |
| [22] | 周丽敏、 祁占勇. 2023. 大学外语课程思政教学评价量表开发研究[J]. 外语界(3): 71-77. |
| [23] | 周丽敏、王亚敏、 邢振江. 2023. 旅游英语翻译课程思政的价值旨趣及其实践路径[J]. 上海翻译(2): 55-60. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |