语言学研究

跨学科视域下拟人隐喻分形建构模式

  • 刘春杰 ,
  • 王晋军
展开
  • 广州大学,广州,510006
刘春杰,博士,广州大学外国语学院副教授。主要研究方向为社会语言学、俄罗斯研究。电子邮箱:lcj@gzhu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2025-11-07

基金资助

*2024年教育部中外语言交流合作中心国际中文教育研究重点课题“东盟国家的外语教育政策与国际中文教育生态研究”(编号24YH03B);2025年广东省研究生教育创新计划项目研究生课程建设项目“话语分析”(编号2025KCJS_083)

The Fractal Construction Models of Personification Metaphors: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

  • LIU Chunjie ,
  • WANG Jinjun
Expand

Online published: 2025-11-07

摘要

从语言认知的视角看,拟人是基于概念隐喻“事物是人”的一种修辞手段。为系统揭示拟人隐喻的建构规律,本研究引入分形理论和“特征喻”这一核心概念,确定拟人隐喻的认知机制在于从喻体“人”的诸多分形表象中提取某一特定特征投射至本体。结合框架语义学与个体行为理论,本研究将“人”这一概念解构为生理、行为、认知、情绪、个性和境遇六大分形表象,进而推导出六种拟人隐喻建构模式。在此基础上,以中俄文学作品中“风”的拟人隐喻为跨文化案例,验证该模式的应用价值。本研究旨在明晰拟人隐喻的跨域整合本质,深化分形理论在认知语言学中的应用,并为外语教学中的跨文化隐喻理解提供新视角。

本文引用格式

刘春杰 , 王晋军 . 跨学科视域下拟人隐喻分形建构模式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2025 , 25(5) : 186 -195 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.05.019

Abstract

From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, personification is a rhetorical device grounded in the conceptual metaphor that attributes human qualities to non-human entities. To systematically elucidate its construction, this study introduces fractal theory and the concept of “feature-based metaphor”. Its cognitive mechanism involves extracting specific features from the fractal manifestations of the vehicle “human” and mapping them onto the tenor. By integrating frame semantics and individual behavior theory, this study deconstructs the concept of “human” into six fractal dimensions - physiology, behavior, cognition, emotion, personality, and situation - yielding six models of personification metaphors. Cross-cultural personification metaphors of “wind” in Chinese and Russian literary works serve to validate the models’ applicability. This research clarifies the cross-domain integration of personification metaphors, advances the application of fractal theory in cognitive linguistics, and offers new insights for cross-cultural metaphor comprehension in foreign language teaching.

参考文献

[1] Coulson, S. & T. Oakley. 2005. Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics[J]. Journal of Pragmatics (37): 1510-1536.
[2] Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2008. The origin of language as a product of the evolution of double-scope blending[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(5): 520-521.
[3] Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[4] Karpukhina, T. P. & A. V. Lugovskoy. 2021. Anthropomorphic metaphorical features in figurative content of island concept[J]. Nauchnyi Dialog (11):106-122.
[5] Karatkevich, Z.A. & M.O. Lojko. 2022. Anthropomorphous metaphor in economic discourse: receptive learning by Russian-speaking students[J]. Cuadernos de Rusistica Espanola (18): 173-186.
[6] Kim, HaeYeon. 2019. A Feature-based analysis of similes and metaphors in metaphor theory[J]. Discourse and Cognition 26(1): 21-42.
[7] van der Merwe, P. H. 2021. Recycling ghosts: Reimagining C. Louis Leipoldt’s play “Die Laaste Aand” (1930)[D]. South Africa: University of Pretoria.
[8] 陈鹏展. 2018. 个体行为的机器识别与决策协同[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社.
[9] 李光华. 2024. 扩展概念隐喻理论视角下《我是你的瓷儿》拟人隐喻识解[J]. 山东理工大学学报(社会科学版) 40(6):76-86.
[10] 束定芳. 2000. 隐喻学研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[11] 王银平. 2021. 基于认知视角的拟人隐喻及其文化内涵研究[J]. 汉字文化(13):182-184,190.
[12] 文秋芳. 2017. 拟人隐喻“人类命运共同体”的概念、人际和语篇功能——评析习近平第70届联合国大会一般性辩论中的演讲[J]. 外语学刊(3):1-6.
[13] 肖思虹. 2025. 文旅宣传用语中的拟人隐喻[J]. 汉字文化(9):95-98.
[14] 徐盛桓. 2020a. 隐喻喻体的建构——分形论视域下隐喻研究之一[J]. 外语教学 41(1):6-11.
[15] 徐盛桓. 2020b. 隐喻本体和喻体的相似——分形论视域下隐喻研究之二[J]. 当代修辞学(2):11-23.
[16] 徐一楠. 2024. 拟人隐喻视角下的生态话语构建——以南京市红山森林动物园公示语为例[J]. 外语研究 41(6):50-54.
文章导航

/